skip to main content
10.1145/3077981.3078045acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmocoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Incorporating Kinesthetic Creativity and Gestural Play into Immersive Modeling

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The 3D modeling methods and approach presented in this paper attempt to bring the richness and spontaneity of human kinesthetic interaction in the physical world to the process of shaping digital form, by exploring playfully creative interaction techniques that augment gestural movement. The principal contribution of our research is a novel dynamics-driven approach for immersive freeform modeling, which extends our physical reach and supports new forms of expression. In this paper we examine three augmentations of freehand 3D interaction that are inspired by the dynamics of physical phenomena. These are experienced via immersive augmented reality to intensify the virtual physicality and heighten the sense of creative empowerment.

References

  1. Julian Adenauer, Johann Habakuk Israel, and Rainer Stark. 2013. Virtual Reality Technologies for Creative Design. In CIRP Design 2012, Amaresh Chakrabarti (Ed.). Springer London, 125--135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aaron Bangor, Philip Kortum, and James Miller. 2009. Determining What Individual SUS Scores Mean: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale. J. Usability Studies 4, 3 (May 2009), 114--123. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2835587.2835589 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. John Brooke. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. In Usability evaluation in industry. CRC Press. https://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9780748404605 ISBN: 9780748404605.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jeff Butterworth, Andrew Davidson, Stephen Hench, and Marc. T. Olano. 1992. 3DM: A Three Dimensional Modeler Using a Head-mounted Display. In Proceedings of the 1992 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (I3D '92). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 135--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. James H. Clark. 1976. Hierarchical Geometric Models for Visible Surface Algorithms. Commun. ACM 19, 10 (Oct. 1976), 547--554. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Michael F. Deering. 1995. HoloSketch: A Virtual Reality Sketching/Animation Tool. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 2, 3 (Sept. 1995), 220--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Michael F. Deering. 1996. The HoloSketch VR Sketching System. Commun. ACM 39, 5 (May 1996), 54--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Paul Haeberli. 1989. Dynadraw. (1989). Retrieved January 10, 2016 from http://www.graficaobscura.com/dyna/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Johann Habakuk Israel, Laurence Mauderli, and Laurent Greslin. 2013. Mastering Digital Materiality in Immersive Modelling. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling (SBIM '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Johann Habakuk Israel, Eva Wiese, Magdalena Mateescu, Christian Zöllner, and Rainer Stark. 2009. Investigating three-dimensional sketching for early conceptual design - Results from expert discussions and user studies. Computers & Graphics 33, 4 (2009), 462--473. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Daniel F. Keefe. 2007. Interactive 3D Drawing for Free-form Modeling in Scientific Visualization and Art: Tools, Methodologies, and Theoretical Foundations. Ph.D. Dissertation. Providence, RI, USA. Advisor(s) Laidlaw, David H. AAI3271999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Daniel F. Keefe, Daniel Acevedo Feliz, Tomer Moscovich, David H. Laidlaw, and Joseph J. LaViola, Jr. 2001. CavePainting: A Fully Immersive 3D Artistic Medium and Interactive Experience. In Proceedings of the 2001 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (I3D '01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 85--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Scott Kuehnert. 2015. Express Yourself! Augmenting Reality with Graffiti. (2015). Retrieved June 23, 2015 from http://blog.leapmotion.com/express-augmenting-reality-graffiti-3dGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Joseph J. LaViola and Daniel F. Keefe. 2011. 3D Spatial Interaction: Applications for Art, Design, and Science. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Courses (SIGGRAPH '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 75 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Leap Motion. 2015. 3D Motion and Gesture Control for PC & Mac. (2015). Retrieved June 2, 2015 from https://www.leapmotion.com/product/vrGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Golan Levin. 2000. Painterly interfaces for audiovisual performance. Master's thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Advisor(s) Maeda, John. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61848Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wille Mäkelä. 2005. Working 3d meshes and particles with finger tips, towards an immersive artists. In Interface, Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality Workshop. Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Wille Mäkelä and Tommi Ilmonen. Drawing, painting and sculpting in the air: Development studies about an immersive free-hand interface for artists.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Wille Mäkelä, Markku Reunanen, and Tapio Takala. 2004. Possibilities and Limitations of Immersive Free-hand Expression: A Case Study with Professional Artists. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MULTIMEDIA '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 504--507. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mark Mine, Arun Yoganandan, and Dane Coffey. 2015. Principles, interactions and devices for real-world immersive modeling. Computers & Graphics 48 (2015), 84--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Oculus VR. 2015. Oculus Best Practices Guide. (2015). Retrieved June 15, 2015 from http://developer.oculusvr.com/best-practicesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Reunanen, K. Palovuori, T. Ilmonen, and W. Mäkelä. 2005. NäPrä: Affordable Fingertip Tracking with Ultrasound. In Proceedings of the 11th Eurographics Conference on Virtual Environments (EGVE'05). Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, 51--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Steven Schkolne, Michael Pruett, and Peter Schröder. 2001. Surface Drawing: Creating Organic 3D Shapes with the Hand and Tangible Tools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 261--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Christopher Schmandt. 1983. Spatial Input/Display Correspondence in a Stereoscopic Computer Graphic Work Station. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 17, 3 (July 1983), 253--261. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Scott Snibbe, Sean Anderson, and Bill Verplank. Springs and constraints for 3d drawing. In Proceedings of the Third Phantom Users Group Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. T. M. Takala, M. Mäkäräinen, and P. Hämäläinen. 2013. Immersive 3D modeling with Blender and off-the-shelf hardware. In 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). 191--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tilt Brush. 2015. Tilt Brush. (2015). Retrieved June 22, 2015 from http://www.tiltbrush.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jeremy Turner. 2002. Myron Krueger Live. (2002). http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=328Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. VR Clay. 2015. Sculpting in Virtual Reality with Oculus Rift and Razer Hydra. (2015). Retrieved June 22, 2015 from http://vrclay.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. E. Wiese, J. H. Israel, A. Meyer, and S. Bongartz. 2010. Investigating the Learnability of Immersive Free-hand Sketching. In Proceedings of the Seventh Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling Symposium (SBIM '10). Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, 135--142. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1923363.1923387 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Incorporating Kinesthetic Creativity and Gestural Play into Immersive Modeling

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            MOCO '17: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing
            June 2017
            206 pages
            ISBN:9781450352093
            DOI:10.1145/3077981

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 28 June 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate50of110submissions,45%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader