skip to main content
10.1145/3078810.3078826acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesperdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring spatial meaning with a tangible map

Published:07 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe the Tangible Map, an interactive, table-mounted tactile / digital display aimed at facilitating exploration of an environment and the data generated therein. For visitors in an urban setting, translating abstract map symbols into comprehensible information can be a challenging task due to the level of abstraction and the disconnect between flat displays and spatial information. We address this question by combining a tangible user interface (created with 3D-printed buildings) and dynamic spatial information. To explore these concepts, we designed and fabricated the Tangible Map to serve as an interactive centerpiece within the MIT campus. Through application of user-centered design principles, we demonstrate strategies for managing user attention across beyond-field-of-view displays.

References

  1. Florian Alt, Stefan Schneegaß, Albrecht Schmidt, Jörg Müller, and Nemanja Memarovic. 2012. How to evaluate public displays. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA,, Article 17, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Borries, F., Walz, S. and Böttger, M. Space Time Play: Synergies Between Computer Games, Architecture and Urbanism: The Next Level. Birkhäuser 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wolfgang Büschel, Ulrike Kister, Mathias Frisch, and Raimund Dachselt. 2014. T4 - transparent and translucent tangibles on tabletops. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sandy Claes and Andrew Vande Moere. 2015. The Role of Tangible Interaction in Exploring Information on Public Visualization Displays. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 201--207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jorgos Coenen, Niels Wouters, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2016. Synchronized wayfinding on multiple consecutively situated public displays. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 182--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cristiani, E., & Rocchi, L. (2014). A level set based method for fixing overhangs in 3D printing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1714.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D. Drochtert, C. Geiger, M. Hogen, A. Huldtgren, O. Köse, R. Wiche, and L. Loss. 2015. Public Brewing: a Media Façade with a Mixed Reality Interface. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 69--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jérémie Dumas, Jean Hergel, and Sylvain Lefebvre. 2014. Bridging the gap: automated steady scaffoldings for 3D printing. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 4, Article 98 (July 2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ivan Elhart, Marc Langheinrich, Nemanja Memarovic, and Elisa Rubegni. 2016. A good balance of costs and benefits: convincing a university administration to support the installation of an interactive multi-application display system on campus. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 197--203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Patrick Tobias Fischer, Anke von der Heide, Eva Hornecker, Sabine Zierold, Andreas Kästner, Felix Dondera, Matti Wiegmann, Fernando Millán, Jonas Lideikis, Aidas Čergelis, Reinaldo Verde, Christoph Drews, Till Fastnacht, Kai Gerrit Lünsdorf, Djamel Merad, Aryan Khosravani, and Hesam Jannesar. 2015. Castle-Sized Interfaces: An Interactive Façade Mapping. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Luke Hespanhol, Martin Tomitsch, Kazjon Grace, Anthony Collins, and Judy Kay. 2012. Investigating intuitiveness and effectiveness of gestures for free spatial interaction with large displays. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA,, Article 6, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Marius Hoggenmueller and Alexander Wiethoff. 2015. Blinking Lights and Other Revelations: Experiences Designing Hybrid Media Façades. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 77--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hiroshi Ishii. 2008. Tangible bits: beyond pixels. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (TEI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, xv--xxv. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Menno-Jan Kraak, Ferjan Ormeling. 2011. Cartography: visualization of spatial data. Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ali Mazalek, Claudia Winegarden, Tristan Al-Haddad, Susan J. Robinson, and Chih-Sung Wu. 2009. Architales: physical/digital co-design of an interactive story table. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 241--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Yasuto Nakanishi. 2012. Virtual prototyping using miniature model and visualization for interactive public displays. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 458--467. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Norman, D. A. Living with Complexity. MIT Press, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mettina Veenstra, Niels Wouters, Marije Kanis, Stephan Brandenburg, Kevin te Raa, Bart Wigger, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2015. Should Public Displays be Interactive? Evaluating the Impact of Interactivity on Audience Engagement. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Julie R. Williamson, Daniel Sundén, and Keith Hamilton. 2016. The lay of the land: techniques for displaying discrete and continuous content on a spherical display. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 38--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Brandon Taylor, Anind Dey, Dan Siewiorek, and Asim Smailagic. 2016. Customizable 3D Printed Tactile Maps as Interactive Overlays. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 71--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring spatial meaning with a tangible map

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PerDis '17: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays
      June 2017
      186 pages
      ISBN:9781450350457
      DOI:10.1145/3078810
      • General Chair:
      • Marc Langheinrich,
      • Program Chair:
      • Sarah Clinch

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      PerDis '17 Paper Acceptance Rate21of38submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate213of384submissions,55%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader