skip to main content
10.1145/3079452.3079505acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdhConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Who is Spreading Rumours about Vaccines?: Influential User Impact Modelling in Social Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Vaccine hesitancy, traditionally linked to issues of trust, misinformation and prior beliefs, has been increasingly fuelled by influential groups on social media (SM) and the Internet. Analysis of news media and social networks (SN) accessible in real-time provides a new opportunity for detecting changes in public confidence in vaccines. However, different concerns are important in different regions, and reasons for hesitancy and the role of opinion leaders vary between sub-controversies in the broader vaccination debates. It is therefore important for public health professionals to gain an overview of the emerging debates in cyberspace, identify influential users and rumours, and assess their impact in order to know how to respond.

The VAC Medi+Board project aims to visualise the diffusion of rumours through SN and assess the impact of key individuals. We include, as a case study, discussions during winter 2015-16 pertaining to the alleged side-effects of the HPV vaccine.

References

  1. P. Kostkova. Public Health. Chapter in Y Mejova, I Weber, MW Macy (Eds): "Twitter: Digital Socioscope", Cambridge University Press, UCA, 2015, pp.111--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P Kostkova, D. Fowler, S Wiseman, J Weinberg. "Major infection events over 5 years -- how is media coverage influencing online information needs of healthcare professionals and the public"? Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), 2013, 15(7):e107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. P Kostkova, S Garbin, J Moser, W Pan. Integration and visualization public health dashboard: the medi+board pilot project. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web companion (WWW Companion '14). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 657--662. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M Szomszor, P Kostkova, C St Louis. Twitter Informatics: Tracking and Understanding Public Reaction during the 2009 Swine Flu Pandemics. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology 2011, WI-IAT, Vol. 1, pp.320--323. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. Kostkova, M Szomszor, C St Louis. #swineflu: The Use of Twitter as an Early Warning Tool and for Risk Communication in the 2009 Swine Flu Pandemic. ACM Transactions on Management Information systems (ACM TMIS), SI on Informatics for Smart Health and Wellbeing, Vol 5, No 2, Article 8, July 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ten great public health achievements -- United States. 1900--1999, MMWR Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report 48:241--243, 99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C Ash. Summun bonum. Science Translational Medicine 2:61ed8, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. VAA Jansen et al. Measles outbreaks in a population with declining vaccine uptake. Science 301:804, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M Salathe et al. The effect of opinion clustering on disease outbreaks. Journal R Soc Interface 5:1505--1508, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M Salathe, S Khandelwal. Assessing Vaccination Sentiments with online Social Media: Implications for Infectious Disease dynamics and Control. PLOS Computational Biology, October 2011, Vol 7, Issue 10, e1002199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S Aral et al. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. PNAS USA, 106:21544--21549.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. CR Shalizi, AC Thomas. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociology Methods Research 40:211--239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M Salathe, QV Duy, K Shashank, DR Hunter. The dynamics of health behaviour sentiments on a large online social network. EPJ Data Science 2013, 2:4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Larson et al. Tracking the global spread of vaccine sentiments: the global response to Japan's suspension of its HPV vaccine recommendation. Hum Vaccin Immunother, 10(9), pp. 2543--50 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Larson et al. Measuring vaccine confidence: analysis of data obtained by a media surveillance system used to analyze public concerns about vaccines. Lancet Infect Dis 13(7), pp. 606--13 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. P Kostkova, V Mano, HJ Larson, WS Schulz. VAC Medi+Board: Analysing Vaccine Rumours in News and Social Media. Proc of the 6th International Conference on Digital Health, pp. 163--164, Montreal, Canada, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Y Yang, J Lescovec. Modeling Information Diffusion in Implicit Networks. Stanford online library: http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/989/1/paper-influence.pdf (accessed October 20th 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Kostkova. Medi+board: The Public Health Dashboard. Oral Presentation and Abstract in the Proceedings of the Medicine 2.0 2014, Malaga October 9--10th, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. H Larson. The world must accept that the HPV vaccine is safe. Nature, Volume 528, Issue 5780, December 1 2015, http://www.nature.com/news/the-world-must-accept-that-the-hpv-vaccine-is-safe-1.18918Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Varadkar, L. National Sexual Health Strategy 2015 - 2020 And Action Plan 2015--2016. Ireland {online}. Available at: http://health.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/National-Sexual-Health-Strategy.pdf {Accessed 19 Apr. 2016}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pratt, S. The Short Half-Life of Your Social Recruiting Posts. Social Talent {online}. Available at: http://www.socialtalent.co/blog/the-short-half-life-of-your-social-media-posts {Accessed 19 Apr. 2016}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kostkova P, et al. Who Owns the Data? Open Data for Healthcare. Front. Public Health 4:7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Who is Spreading Rumours about Vaccines?: Influential User Impact Modelling in Social Networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      DH '17: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Digital Health
      July 2017
      256 pages
      ISBN:9781450352499
      DOI:10.1145/3079452

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 July 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader