skip to main content
10.1145/3080631.3080639acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschinese-chiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Experimental Evaluation of Tactile Patterns over Frictional Surface on Mobile Phones

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Tactile displays1 have been widely used in information transfer through various tactile patterns on mobile devices. The fundamental consideration in designing tactile interactions is intuitive tactile feedback patterns that convey information. This study investigates the user perception of various tactile stimuli patterns over frictional surface on mobile phones in terms of strong feedback. We designed 36 different tactile patterns with a combination of different signal lengths (w1 = 0.2-3.2 mm) and intervals (w2 = 0.2-3.2 mm) of frictional feedbacks. These parameters covered most cases in the tactile pattern design for a mobile phone. Using these stimuli, we presented 666 pairs of comparisons to 50 participants who would distinguish whether the stimuli in each pair were similar or different. The results indicated the dense patterns in which smaller values of w1 and w2 conveyed stronger tactile feedback and quick distinguish time to users. Meanwhile, the denser tactile patterns had significant differences, which suggests that users can easily distinguish different strong tactile patterns even when these patterns appeared simultaneously. The results of this study can be used as a reference to design tactons, obtain non-visual information, or encode tactile language.

References

  1. Salminen, K., Surakka, V., Lylykangas, J., Raisamo, J., Saarinen, R., Raisamo, R., Rantala, J., and Evreinov, G. 2008. Emotional and behavioral responses to haptic stimulation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1555--1562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mullenbach, J., Shultz, C., Colgate, J.E., and Piper, A.M. 2014. Exploring affective communication through variable-friction surface haptics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3963--3972. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alqudah, Z., Doush, I., Alkhateeb, F., Maghayreh, E., and Alkhaleel, O. 2014. Utilizing Mobile Devices' Tactile Feedback for Presenting Braille Characters: An Optimized Approach for Fast Reading and Long Battery Life. Interacting with Computers, 26, 1, 63--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Sarakoglou, I., Garcia-Hernandez, N., Tsagarakis, N., and Caldwell, D. 2012. A High Performance Tactile Feedback Display and Its Integration in Teleoperation. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 5, 3, 252--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Prasad, M., Russell, M., and Hammond, T.A. 2014. Designing Vibrotactile Codes to Communicate Verb Phrases. Acm Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications & Applications, 11, 1s, 1--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Azadi, M. and Jones, L.A. 2014. Evaluating Vibrotactile Dimensions for the Design of Tactons. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 7, 1, 14--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hafez, M. 2007. Tactile interfaces: technologies, applications and challenges. The Visual Computer, 23, 4, 267--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Winfield, L., Glassmire, J., Colgate, J.E., and Peshkin, M. 2007. T-pad: Tactile pattern display through variable friction reduction. In EuroHaptics Conference, 2007 and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics 2007. Second Joint, 421--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mullenbach, J., Shultz, C., Piper, A.M., Peshkin, M., and Colgate, J.E. 2013. Surface haptic interactions with a TPad tablet. In Proceedings of the adjunct publication of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 7--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Maclean, K. and Enriquez, M. 2003. Perceptual Design of Haptic Icons. In Proceedings of Eurohaptics, 351--363.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Al-Qudahj, Z., Doush, I.A., Alkhateeb, F., Maghayreh, E., and Al-Khaleel, O. 2011. Reading Braille on mobile phones: A fast method with low battery power consumption. In User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), 2011 International Conference on, 118--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Brewster, S. and Brown, L.M. 2004. Tactons: structured tactile messages for non-visual information display. In Proceedings of the fifth conference on Australasian user interface-Volume 28, 15--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Li, K.A., Baudisch, P., Griswold, W.G., and Hollan, J.D. 2008. Tapping and rubbing: exploring new dimensions of tactile feedback with voice coil motors. In Proceedings of the 21st annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 181--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bau, O., Poupyrev, I., Israr, A., and Harrison, C. 2010. TeslaTouch: electrovibration for touch surfaces. In Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 283--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ferris, T.K. and Sarter, N. 2010. When Content Matters: The Role of Processing Code in Tactile Display Design. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 3, 3, 199--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rantala, J., Raisamo, R., Lylykangas, J., Surakka, V., Raisamo, J., Salminen, K., Pakkanen, T., and Hippula, A. 2009. Methods for Presenting Braille Characters on a Mobile Device with a Touchscreen and Tactile Feedback. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 2, 1, 28--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Spirkovska, L. 2005. Summary of Tactile User Interfaces Techniques and Systems. NASA Ames Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoggan, E. and Brewster, S. 2007. New parameters for tacton design. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2417--2422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Saket, B., Prasojo, C., Huang, Y., and Zhao, S. 2013. Designing an effective vibration-based notification interface for mobile phones. In Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 149--1504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hollins, M. and Bensmaïa, S.J. 2007. The coding of roughness. Canadian journal of experimental psychology, 61, 3, 184--195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Žiberna, A., Kejzar, N., and Golob, P. 2004. A Comparison of Different Approaches to Hierarchical Clustering of Ordinal Data. Metodološki zvezki, 1, 1, 57--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Experimental Evaluation of Tactile Patterns over Frictional Surface on Mobile Phones
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      Chinese CHI '17: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium of Chinese CHI
      June 2017
      67 pages
      ISBN:9781450353083
      DOI:10.1145/3080631

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Chinese CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate9of19submissions,47%Overall Acceptance Rate17of40submissions,43%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader