skip to main content
10.1145/3083671.3083676acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-tConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The role of Participatory Social Mapping in the struggle of the territory and the right to the city: A case study in Buenos Aires

Published:26 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a case study of Social Mapping and Participatory Cartography over a shaded territory in Buenos Aires City, Argentina. The project "Caminos de la Villa" was possible thanks to the collaboration of multiple NGOs that worked together to provide visibility on development issues in poor neighborhoods, commonly called "Villas" and "Asentamientos". We take a critical perspective on how developing such tools are embedded of expectation, negotiations and interactions between actors. Doing ethnographic research and documentation analysis, we found that the value for residents is not in the tool itself but in the appropriation process and empowering, led by acquiring new knowledge at working collectively.

References

  1. John Agnew. 1993. REPRESENTING SPACE. Space, scale and culture in social science. In Place/culture/representation, James Ducan and David Ley (Eds.). Routledge, London, Chapter 14, 251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. James Ash, Rob Kitchin, and Agnieszka Leszczynski. 2015. Digital turn, digital geography? SSRN (2015), 1--26. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Susana Barrera Lobatón. 2009. Refexiones sobre Sistemas de Información Ge-ográfica Participativos (SIGP) y cartografía social. Cuadernos de geografía 18 (2009), 9--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Pierre Bourdieu. 1999. La miseria del mundo. Vol. 1. Ediciones Ákal, Madrid, España. 569 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Pierre Bourdieu, Alain Accardo, Gabrielle Balazs, Beaud Stéphane, François Bonvin, and Emmanuel Bourdieu. 1999. The Weight of the World. Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. 507--513 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Joe Bryan. 2011. Walking the line: Participatory mapping, indigenous rights, and neoliberalism. Geoforum 42, 1 (2011), 40--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Sébastien Caquard. 2013. Cartography II: Collective cartographies in the social media era. Progress in Human Geography 38, 1 (2013), 141--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Andrea Catenazzi, Aída Quintar, María Cristina Cravino, Natalia De Represen-taçao, and Alicia Novick. 2009. El retorno político a la cuestión urbana. Teritori-alidad y acción pública en el Área Metropolitana de Buenos Aires. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, Los Polvorines. 164 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeremy W Crampton and John Krygier. 2005. An introduction to critical cartography. ACME: an International E-journal for Critical Geographies 4, 1 (2005), 11--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Martin Dodge, Rob Kitchin, C. R. Perkins, Martin Dodge, Rob Kitchin, and C. R. Perkins. 2009. Rethinking Maps. Vol. 31. Routledge, Oxon. 246 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Taylor Dotson. 2013. Design for Community: Toward a Communitarian Ergonomics. Philosophy & Technology 26, 2 (2013), 139--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Marcelo Escolar. 2003. Exploration, Cartography and the Modernization of State Power. In State/Space. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, USA, 27--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Michael F. Goodchild and University Of California Michael F. Goodchild. 2007. Assertion and Authority: the Science User- Generated Geographic Content. In Proceedings of the Colloquium for Andrew U. Frank's 60th Birthday. 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mordechai Haklay. 2013. Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation. Environment and Planning A 45, 1 (2013), 55--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. David Harvey. 2014. Rebel cities. from the right to the city to the right to the urban revolution. Vol. 40. Verso, London; New York. 289--292 pages. arXiv:arXiv:1011.1669v3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Carlos Marcelo Jaramillo and Héctor Mora-Páez. 2004. APROXIMACIÓN A LA CONSTRUCCIÓN DE CARTOGRAFÍA SOCIAL A TRAVÉS DE LAGEOMÁTICA. Ventana informática enero-juni, 11 (2004), 129--146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Annette M. Kim. 2015. Critical cartography 2.0: From "participatory mapping" to authored visualizations of power and people. Landscape and Urban Planning 142 (2015), 215--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Rob Kitchin, Justin Gleeson, and Martin Dodge. 2013. Unfolding mapping practices: a new epistemology for cartography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38, 3 (2013), 480--496.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Henri Lefebvre. 1968. Le droit ala ville. Anthopos, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Olga Paraskevopoulou, Dimitris Charitos, and Charalampos Rizopoulos. 2008. Prácticas artísticas basadas en la localización que desafían la noción tradicional de cartografía. Artnodes, Revista de arte, ciencia y tecnología 8, Locative media y práctica artística: exploraciones sobre el terreno (2008). http://www.uoc.edu/artnodes/8/dt/esp/paraskevopoulouGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Stéphane Roche. 2014. Geographic Information Science I: Why does a smart city need to be spatially enabled? Progress in Human Geography 38, 5 (2014), 0309132513517365--.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Renée E Sieber and Mordechai Haklay. 2015. The epistemology(s) of volunteered geographic information: a critique. Geo: Geography and Environment 2, 2 (dec 2015), 122--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Edward W Soja. 1985. The Spatiality of Social Life: Towards a Transformative Retheorisation. In Social Relations and Spatial Structures, Derek Gregory and John Urry (Eds.). Macmillan Education UK, London, 90--127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Irene Vélez Torres, Sandra Rátiva Gaona, and Daniel Varela Corredor. 2012. Cartografía social como metodología participativa y colaborativa de investigación en el territorio afrodescendiente de la cuenca Methodology in the Upper Basin of the Cauca River. Cuadernos de geografía 21, 2 (2012), 59--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. A Turner. 2006. Introduction to Neogeography. In OReilly Short Cuts. O'Reilly Media, 54. https://books.google.es/books?id=oHgDv4feV-8CGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Laura Vaughan, David L Chatford Clark, Ozlem Sahbaz, and Mordechai Haklay. 2005. Space and exclusion: Does urban morphology play a part in social deprivation? Area 37 (2005), 402--412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Wingu. 2015. Lanzamos Caminos de la Villa, la primera plataforma online para dar visibilidad a los reclamos de las villas de Buenos Aires. (2015). http://tinyurl.com/wingu2014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The role of Participatory Social Mapping in the struggle of the territory and the right to the city: A case study in Buenos Aires

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        C&T '17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies
        June 2017
        345 pages
        ISBN:9781450348546
        DOI:10.1145/3083671

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 June 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        C&T '17 Paper Acceptance Rate34of66submissions,52%Overall Acceptance Rate80of183submissions,44%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader