skip to main content
10.1145/3084381.3084385acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Trust and Risk in E-Commerce: A Re-examination and Theoretical Integration

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Feedback system plays an important role in E-commerce as decision support for buyers. In this paper we examine the role of feedback system in building trust towards unknown E-vendors when buyers are making purchase for the first time. We adopted Signaling theory from marketing literature to breakdown the cognitive process of buyers when they face a mixture of true and fake advertisements and guarantees from the E-vendor, and how they perceive the signals to be honest and true. We posit that Social Presence signals from reviewers in the feedback system possess the bonding ability that makes the cost/difficulty in sending fake signals prohibitively high in given feedback system. This perceived credibility in feedback system then positively influence the perceived credibility of trust-building signals, as the cost for sending fake signal without being exposed by the feedback system is extremely high. Finally, the perceived level of trust in the E-vendor positively influence the perceived credibility of risk-reducing signals, because the potential loss of sending out fake signals will jeopardise established consumer trust, which is highly sought after and valuable. By identifying the reinforcing effect between these constructs rather than parallel constructs, we hypothesize that interpersonal signals serve as a "primer" that can trigger this chain reaction, and feedback system has a much broader implication in the formation of online trust than previously recognized. For practitioners of e-commerce, this study provides an alternative source of trust-building tools apart from costly traditional signaling behaviors.

References

  1. Gefen, D. e-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28, 6 (2000), 725--737.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V. and Kacmar, C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information systems research, 13, 3 (2002), 334--359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ba, S. and Pavlou, P. A. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS quarterly (2002), 243--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chevalier, J. A. and Mayzlin, D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of marketing research, 43, 3 (2006), 345--354.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mudambi, S. M. and Schuff, D. What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. MIS quarterly, 34, 1 (2010), 185--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Panniello, U., Gorgoglione, M. and Tuzhilin, A. Research Note-In CARSs We Trust: How Context-Aware Recommendations Affect Customers' Trust and Other Business Performance Measures of Recommender Systems. Information Systems Research, 27, 1 (2016), 182--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mishra, D. P., Heide, J. B. and Cort, S. G. Information asymmetry and levels of agency relationships. Journal of marketing Research (1998), 277--295.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jensen, M. L., Averbeck, J. M., Zhang, Z. and Wright, K. B. Credibility of anonymous online product reviews: A language expectancy perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 1 (2013), 293--324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dong, B., Liu, Q., Fu, Y. and Zhang, L. A research of Taobao cheater detection. Springer, City, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jindal, N. and Liu, B. Review spam detection. ACM, City, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Luca, M. and Zervas, G. Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Science (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D. and Reutzel, C. R. Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37, 1 (2011), 39--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kirmani, A. and Rao, A. R. No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of marketing, 64, 2 (2000), 66--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ippolito, P. M. Bonding and nonbonding signals of product quality. Journal of Business (1990), 41--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gupta, A., Su, B.-C. and Walter, Z. An empirical study of consumer switching from traditional to electronic channels: A purchase-decision process perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8, 3 (2004), 131--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jiang, Z. and Benbasat, I. Virtual product experience: Effects of visual and functional control of products on perceived diagnosticity and flow in electronic shopping. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 3 (2004), 111--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Bigley, G. A. and Pearce, J. L. Straining for shared meaning in organization science: Problems of trust and distrust. Academy of management review, 23, 3 (1998), 405--421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Fan, M., Tan, Y. and Whinston, A. B. Evaluation and design of online cooperative feedback mechanisms for reputation management. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17, 2 (2005), 244--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Gunawardena, C. N. Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International journal of educational telecommunications, 1, 2/3 (1995), 147--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dellarocas, C. The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management science, 49, 10 (2003), 1407--1424. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Cheung, C. M. and Thadani, D. R. The effectiveness of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis. Proceedings of the 23rd Bled eConference eTrust: implications for the individual, enterprises and society (2010), 329--345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gefen, D. and Pavlou, P. A. The boundaries of trust and risk: The quadratic moderating role of institutional structures. Information Systems Research, 23, 3-part-2 (2012), 940--959. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Trust and Risk in E-Commerce: A Re-examination and Theoretical Integration

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGMIS-CPR '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research
        June 2017
        220 pages
        ISBN:9781450350372
        DOI:10.1145/3084381

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 June 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader