skip to main content
10.1145/3085228.3085275acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enterprise Architectures for Supporting the Adoption of Big Data

Published: 07 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Governments from all over the world are struggling to take advantage of big data developments. Enterprise Architecture (EA) can be used as an instrument to integrate big data (BD) in the existing business processes and ICT-landscape. In this policy paper, we explore the role of EA in the adoption of BD. For this, we adopted a qualitative case study approach and investigated a large administrative organization that was in the process of adopting BD. We found in our case study that the first attempts were focused on integrating big data in the current landscape, but this encountered too many challenges that halt progress. To overcome the challenges, a separate BD department and accompanying infrastructure was created. The strategy was first to reap the benefits of BD and to understand what should be done, and thereafter integrating the working systems in the existing landscape. The findings suggest that current infrastructures might not be suitable for integrating BD and substantial changes are needed first. In the case the role of BD needed to be first clarified before EA could play a role in adopting BD. EA should deal with the uncertainties and complexities by ensuring a configurable landscape, by providing an incremental approach for adapting the infrastructure step-by-step, before the benefits of big data can be gained. Developing an incremental migration plan was found to be a key aspect for the adoption of BD.

References

[1]
Lankhorst, M. Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Berlin, 2013.
[2]
Boh, W. F. and Yellin, D. Using Enterprise Architecture Standards in Managing Information Technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 3 (2006), 163--207.
[3]
Janssen, M. Sociopolitical Aspects of Interoperability and Enterprise Architecture in E-Government. Social Science Computer Review, 30, 1 (2012), 24--36.
[4]
Gartner Gartner IT Glossary - Enterprise Architecture. Gartner, Inc., City, 2016.
[5]
Janssen, M. and Kuk, G. Big and Open Linked Data (BOLD) in Research, Policy and Practice. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26, 1-2 (2016), 3--13.
[6]
Bharosa, N., Janssen, M., van Wijk, R., De Winne, N., Van der Voort, H., Hulstijn, J. and Tan, Y.-h. Tapping into existing information flows: The transformation to compliance by design in business-to-government information exchange. Government Information Quarterly, 30, Supplement 1 (2013), S9--S18.
[7]
Elgendy, N. and Elragal, A. Big Data Analytics: A Literature Review Paper. Springer International Publishing, City, 2014.
[8]
McAfee, A. and Brynjolfsson, E. Big data: the management revolution. Harvard business review, 90 (2012), 60--66, 68, 128.
[9]
Gandomi, A. and Haider, M. Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35, 2 (4// 2015), 137--144.
[10]
Bernus, P., Goranson, T., Gøtze, J., Jensen-Waud, A., Kandjani, H., Molina, A., Noran, O., Rabelo, R. J., Romero, D., Saha, P. and Turner, P. Enterprise engineering and management at the crossroads. Computers in Industry, 79 (2016), 87--102.
[11]
Kim, G.-H., Trimi, S. and Chung, J.-H. Big Data Applications in the Government Sector: A Comparative Analysis among Leading Countries. Communications of the ACM, 57, 3 (2014), 78--85.
[12]
TOGAF The Open Group Architecture Framework (Version 9.1). The Open Group, City, 2011.
[13]
Janssen, M. Framing Enterprise Architecture: A meta-framework for analyzing architectural efforts in organizations. Authorhouse, City, 2009.
[14]
Spewak, S. H. Enterprise architecture planning. Developing a blueprint for data, applications and Technology. John Wiley, New York, 1992.
[15]
Bernus, P., Noran, O. and Molina, A. Enterprise architecture: Twenty years of the GERAM framework. Annual Reviews in Control, 39 (2015), 83--93.
[16]
Romero, D. and Vernadat, F. Enterprise information systems state of the art: Past, present and future trends. Computers in Industry, 79 (2016), 3--13.
[17]
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K. and Mead, M. The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 3 (1987), 369--386.
[18]
Yin, R. K. Case Study Research: Design and methods. Sage publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1989.
[19]
Leonardi, P. M. and Barley, S. R. Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 18, 3 (// 2008), 159--176.
[20]
Jones, M. R. and Karsten, H. Giddens's structuratiton thoery and information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 32, 1 (2008), 127--157.
[21]
Giddens, A. New Rules of Sociological Method. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993.
[22]
Kuk, G. and Janssen, M. Assembling infrastructures and business models for service design and innovation. Information Systems Journal, 23 (2013), 445--469.
[23]
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal (1997), 509--533.
[24]
Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 10--11 (2000), 1105--1121.
[25]
Nogueira, J. M., Romero, D., Espadas, J. and Molina, A. Leveraging the Zachman framework implementation using action -- research methodology -- a case study: aligning the enterprise architecture and the business goals. Enterprise Information Systems, 7, 1 (2013), 100--132.
[26]
Foorthuis, R., Van Steenbergen, M., Brinkkemper, S. and Bruls, W. A. G. A theory building study of enterprise architecture practices and benefits. Information Systems Frontiers, 18, 3 (2016), 541--564.
[27]
Alwadain, A., Fielt, E., Korthaus, A. and Rosemann, M. Empirical insights into the development of a service-oriented enterprise architecture. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 105 (2016), 39--52.
[28]
Niemi, E. I. and Pekkola, S. Enterprise Architecture Benefit Realization: Review of the Models and a Case Study of a Public Organization. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 47, 3 (2016), 55--80.
[29]
Erol, O., Sauser, B. J. and Mansouri, M. A framework for investigation into extended enterprise resilience. Enterprise Information Systems, 4, 2 (2010), 111--136.
[30]
Martin, A., Dmitriev, D. and Akeroyd, J. A resurgence of internest in Information Architecture. International Journal of Information Management, 30 (2010), 6--12.
[31]
Zandi, F. and Tavana, M. A fuzzy group multi-criteria enterprise architecture framework selection model. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 1 (2012), 1165--1173.
[32]
Pardo, T. A., Nam, T. and Burke, G. B. E-Government Interoperability: Interaction of Policy, Management, and Technology Dimensions. Social Science Computer Review, 30, 1 (2012), 7--23.
[33]
Lê, L.-S. and Wegmann, A. Hierarchy-oriented modeling of enterprise architecture using reference-model of open distributed processing. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 35, 3 (2013), 277--293.
[34]
Doucet, G., Gøtze, J., Saha, P. and Bernard, S. Coherency Management: Using Enterprise Architecture for Alignment, Agility, and Assurance. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 4, 2 (2008), 9--20.
[35]
Bradley, R. V., Pratt, R. M. E. and Byrd, T. A. The Role of Enterprise Architecture in the Quest for IT Value. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10, 2 (2011), 73--80.
[36]
Simon, D., Fischbach, K. and Schoder, D. Enterprise architecture management and its role in corporate strategic management. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12, 1 (2014), 5--42.
[37]
Vargas, A., Cuenca, L., Boza, A., Sacala, I. and Moisescu, M. Towards the development of the framework for inter sensing enterprise architecture. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27, 1 (2016), 55--72.
[38]
Lindström, Å., Johnson, P., Johansson, E., Ekstedt, M. and Simonsson, M. A survey on CIO concerns-do enterprise architecture frameworks support them? Information Systems Frontiers, 8, 2 (2006), 81--90.
[39]
Närman, P., Holm, H., Höök, D., Honeth, N. and Johnson, P. Using enterprise architecture and technology adoption models to predict application usage. Journal of Systems and Software, 85, 8 (2012), 1953--1967.
[40]
Tamm, T., Seddon, P. B., Shanks, G., Reynolds, P. and Frampton, K. How an Australian Retailer Enabled Business Transformation Through Enterprise Architecture. MIS Quarterly Executive, 14, 4 (2015), 181--193.
[41]
Safari, H., Faraji, Z. and Majidian, S. Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27, 2 (2016), 475--486.
[42]
Vargas, A., Boza, A., Patel, S., Patel, D., Cuenca, L. and Ortiz, A. Inter-enterprise architecture as a tool to empower decision-making in hierarchical collaborative production planning. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 105 (2016), 5--22.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An Architectural Model for Integrating Big Data in Educational Information SystemsManagement, Tourism and Smart Technologies10.1007/978-3-031-44131-8_28(282-288)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • (2021)Enterprise architecture management as a solution for addressing general data protection regulation requirements in a big data context: a systematic mapping studyInformation Systems and e-Business Management10.1007/s10257-020-00500-5Online publication date: 18-Jan-2021
  • (2019)Framework to Develop a Business Synergy through Enterprise ArchitectureProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Systems10.1145/3322645.3322668(125-129)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
dg.o '17: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
June 2017
639 pages
ISBN:9781450353175
DOI:10.1145/3085228
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • IOS Press: IOS Press
  • Digital Government Society of North America

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 June 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. BOLD
  2. ICT-architecture
  3. big data
  4. e-government
  5. enterprise architecture
  6. infrastructure
  7. open data

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

dg.o '17

Acceptance Rates

dg.o '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 66 of 114 submissions, 58%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An Architectural Model for Integrating Big Data in Educational Information SystemsManagement, Tourism and Smart Technologies10.1007/978-3-031-44131-8_28(282-288)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • (2021)Enterprise architecture management as a solution for addressing general data protection regulation requirements in a big data context: a systematic mapping studyInformation Systems and e-Business Management10.1007/s10257-020-00500-5Online publication date: 18-Jan-2021
  • (2019)Framework to Develop a Business Synergy through Enterprise ArchitectureProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Systems10.1145/3322645.3322668(125-129)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2019
  • (2019)Extending organizational capabilities with Open Data to support sustainable and dynamic business ecosystemsSoftware and Systems Modeling10.1007/s10270-019-00756-7Online publication date: 18-Sep-2019

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media