skip to main content
10.1145/3085228.3085316acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Examining Twitter Mentions Between Police Agencies and Public Users through the Lens of Stakeholder Theory

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Police agencies increasingly leverage social media for community policing. This paper examines how municipal police agencies and public users interact on social media by examining their mentioning behaviors on Twitter. We manually annotated 7,142 tweets sent by 14 municipal police agencies within 6 months in 2015, and classified 15,785 tweets where public users mentioned the agencies. Through the lens of Stakeholder Theory, we also classified 10,956 Twitter users, who either mentioned the agencies or were mentioned by the agencies, into different stakeholder groups. Using both qualitative and quantitative methods, we identified patterns of how they mentioned each other. For example, agencies mentioned more popular and local stakeholders, while less popular and non-local stakeholders sent more negative tweets. We discuss implications of the results for police agencies, which include how to better identify and engage stakeholders and foster community policing on Twitter.

References

  1. 2014. Survey on Law Enforcement's Use of Social Media. (2014). http://www.iacpsocialmedia.org/Resources/Publications/2014SurveyResults.aspx {Online; accessed 22-September-2015}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jerry Abramson. 2015. 10 Cities Making Real Progress Since the Launch of the 21st Century Policing Task Force. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fuat Altunbas. 2014. Social Media in Policing: a Study of Dallas-fort Worth Area City Police Departments. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Karin Axelsson, Ulf Melin, and Ida Lindgren. 2013. Public e-services for agency efficiency and citizen benefit-Findings from a stakeholder centered analysis. Government Information Quarterly 30, 1 (2013), 10--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Enrique Bonsón Ponte, Elena Carvajal-Trujillo, and Tomás Escobar-Rodríguez. 2015. Corporate Facebook and stakeholder engagement. Kybernetes 44, 5 (2015), 771--787.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lori Brainard and Mariglynn Edlins. 2015. Top 10 US Municipal Police Departments and Their Social Media Usage. The American Review of Public Administration 45, 6 (2015), 728--745.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Axel Bruns, Jean E. Burgess, Kate Crawford, and Frances Shaw. 2012. #qldfloods and @QPSMedia: Crisis Communication on Twitter in the 2011 South East Queensland Floods. (January 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. David A. Campbell, Kristina T. Lambright, and Christopher J. Wells. 2014. Looking for Friends, Fans, and Followers? Social Media Use in Public and Nonprofit Human Services. Public Administration Review 74, 5 (2014), 655--663.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Community Policing Consortium, Publicity Manager, and United States of America. 1994. Understanding Community Policing: A Framework for Action. (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jeremy Crump. 2011. What are the police doing on Twitter? Social media, the police and the public. Policy & Internet 3, 4 (2011), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sebastian Denef, Petra S Bayerl, and Nico A Kaptein. 2013. Social media and the police: tweeting practices of British police forces during the August 2011 riots. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3471--3480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Leif Skiftenes Flak and Jeremy Rose. 2005. Stakeholder governance: Adapting stakeholder theory to e-government. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 16, 1 (2005), 31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. R Edward Freeman. 2010. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Stephan G. Grimmelikhuijsen and Albert J. Meijer. 2015. Does Twitter Increase Perceived Police Legitimacy? Public Administration Review 75, 4 (2015), 598--607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Youyang Hou and Cliff Lampe. 2015. Social Media Effectiveness for Public Engagement: Example of Small Nonprofits. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3107--3116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Yun Huang, Sen Huo, Yaxing Yao, Niu Chao, Yang Wang, Jennifer Grygiel, and Steve Sawyer. 2016. Municipal Police Departments on Facebook: What Are They Posting and Are People Engaging?. In Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research. ACM, 366--374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Marius Rohde Johannessen, Øystein Sæbø, Leif Skiftenes Flak, and Zahir Irani. 2016. Social Media as Public Sphere: A Stakeholder Perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 10, 2 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Till Keyling and Jakob Jünger. 2013. Facepager (Version, fe 3.3). An application for generic data retrieval through APIs. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kyle Lacy. 2011. Twitter Marketing for Dummies. John Wiley Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Alexander Leichtle. 2012. The Games-Howell Test in R. (2012). http://www.gcf.dkf.unibe.ch/BCB/files/BCB_10Jan12_Alexander.pdf Retrieved October 1st 2012 from.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kristen Lovejoy and Gregory D Saxton. 2012. Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17, 3 (2012), 337--353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Albert Meijer and Marcel Thaens. 2013. Social media strategies: Understanding the differences between North American police departments. Government Information Quarterly 30, 4 (2013), 343--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Ines Mergel. 2012. The social media innovation challenge in the public sector. Information Polity 17, 3, 4 (2012), 281--292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Ines Mergel. 2013. A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly 30, 4 (2013), 327--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ronald K. Mitchell, Bradley R. Agle, and Donna J. Wood. 1997. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review 22, 4 (1997), 853--886.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Christopher D. O'Connor. 0. The police on Twitter: image management, community building, and implications for policing in Canada. Policing and Society 0, 0 (0), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Yan Qu, P. F. Wu, and Xiaoqing Wang. 2009. Online Community Response to Major Disaster: A Study of Tianya Forum in the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake. In System Sciences, 2009. HICSS '09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on. 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Dennis P Rosenbaum, Lisa M Graziano, Cody D Stephens, and Amie M Schuck. 2011. Understanding community policing and legitimacy-seeking behavior in virtual reality: A national study of municipal police websites. Police Quarterly 14, 1 (2011), 25--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Niharika Sachdeva and Ponnurangam Kumaraguru. 2015. Characterising Behavior and Emotions on Social Media for Safety: Exploring Online Communication between Police and Citizens. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.08205 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Øystein Sæbø, Leif Skiftenes Flak, and Maung K Sein. 2011. Understanding the dynamics in e-Participation initiatives: Looking through the genre and stakeholder lenses. Government Information Quarterly 28, 3 (2011), 416--425.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Matthew C Scheider, Robert Chapman, and Amy Schapiro. 2009. Towards the unification of policing innovations under community policing. Policing: An international journal of police strategies & management 32, 4 (2009), 694--718.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Hans J Scholl. 2004. Involving salient stakeholders Beyond the technocratic view on change. Action Research 2, 3 (2004), 277--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Kristina Sedereviciute and Chiara Valentini. 2011. Towards a More Holistic Stakeholder Analysis Approach. Mapping Known and Undiscovered Stakeholders from Social Media. International Journal of Strategic Communication 5, 4 (2011), 221--239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Wesley G Skogan and Susan M Hartnett. 1997. Community policing, Chicago style. Oxford University Press New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Brian G Smith. 2010. Socially distributing public relations: Twitter, Haiti, and interactivity in social media. Public Relations Review 36, 4 (2010), 329--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Liyang Tang, Zhiwei Ni, Hui Xiong, and Hengshu Zhu. 2015. Locating targets through mention in Twitter. World Wide Web 18, 4 (2015), 1019--1049. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Kurt Thomas, Chris Grier, Dawn Song, and Vern Paxson. 2011. Suspended Accounts in Retrospect: An Analysis of Twitter Spam. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 243--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Anthony J Viera, Joanne M Garrett, et al. 2005. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37, 5 (2005), 360--363.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Matthew L. Williams, Adam Edwards, William Housley, Peter Burnap, Omer Rana, Nick Avis, Jeffrey Morgan, and Luke Sloan. 2013. Policing cyber-neighbourhoods: tension monitoring and social media networks. Policing and Society 23, 4 (2013), 461--481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Weiai Xu. 2015. Predicting Social Capital in Nonprofits' Stakeholder Engagement on Social Media. Ph.D. Dissertation. STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Sarita Yardi and Danah Boyd. 2010. Tweeting from the Town Square: Measuring Geographic Local Networks. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    dg.o '17: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
    June 2017
    639 pages
    ISBN:9781450353175
    DOI:10.1145/3085228

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 June 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    dg.o '17 Paper Acceptance Rate66of114submissions,58%Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader