skip to main content
10.1145/3095140.3095147acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescgiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Unsupervised 3D object retrieval with parameter-free hierarchical clustering

Published:27 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In 3D object retrieval, additional knowledge like user input, classification information or database dependent configured parameters are rarely available in real scenarios. For example, meta data about 3D objects is seldom if the objects are not within a well-known evaluation database.

We propose an algorithm which improves the performance of unsupervised 3D object retrieval without using any additional knowledge. For the computation of the distances in our system any descriptor can be chosen; we use the Panorama-descriptor. Our algorithm uses a precomputed parameter-free agglomerative hierarchical clustering and combines the information of the hierarchy of clusters with the individual distances to improve a single object query. Additionally, we propose an adaption algorithm for the cases that new objects are added frequently to the database. We evaluate our approach with 6 databases including a total of 13271 objects in 481 classes. We show that our algorithm improves the average precision in an unsupervised scenario without any parameter configuration.

References

  1. Alexander M Bronstein, Michael M Bronstein, Leonidas J Guibas, and Maks Ovsjanikov. 2011. Shape google: Geometric words and expressions for invariant shape retrieval. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 30, 1 (2011), 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ding-Yun Chen, Xiao-Pei Tian, Yu-Te Shen, and Ming Ouhyoung. 2003. On visual similarity based 3D model retrieval. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 22. Wiley Online Library, 223--232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Helin Dutagaci, BÃČÂijlent Sankur, and YÃČÂijcel Yemez. 2010. Subspace methods for retrieval of general 3D models. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 114, 8 (Aug. 2010), 865--886. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Rui Fang, Afzal Godil, Xiaolan Li, and Asim Wagan. 2008. A new shape benchmark for 3D object retrieval. In Advances in Visual Computing. Springer, 381--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Daniela Giorgi, Silvia Biasotti, and Laura Paraboschi. 2007. Shape retrieval contest 2007: Watertight models track. SHREC competition 8 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Suyu Hou, Kuiyang Lou, and Karthik Ramani. 2005. SVM-based semantic clustering and retrieval of a 3D model database. Computer-Aided Design and Applications 2, 1--4 (2005), 155--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Cheuk Yiu Ip, William C Regli, Leonard Sieger, and Ali Shokoufandeh. 2003. Automated learning of model classifications. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications. ACM, 322--327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Subramaniam Jayanti, Yagnanarayanan Kalyanaraman, Natraj Iyer, and Karthik Ramani. 2006. Developing an engineering shape benchmark for CAD models. Computer-Aided Design 38, 9 (Sept. 2006), 939--953.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Bo Li and Henry Johan. 2013. 3D model retrieval using hybrid features and class information. Multimedia Tools and Applications 62, 3 (Feb. 2013), 821--846. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bo Li, Yijuan Lu, Chunyuan Li, Afzal Godil, Tobias Schreck, Masaki Aono, Qiang Chen, Nihad Karim Chowdhury, Bin Fang, Takahiko Furuya, Henry Johan, Ryuichi Kosaka, Hitoshi Koyanagi, Ryutarou Ohbuchi, and Atsushi Tatsuma. 2014. SHREC' 14 Track: Large Scale Comprehensive 3D Shape Retrieval.. In Eurographics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval 2014 (3DOR 2014). 131--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Zhouhui Lian, Paul L. Rosin, and Xianfang Sun. 2010. Rectilinearity of 3D Meshes. International Journal of Computer Vision 89, 2--3 (Sept. 2010), 130--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Simone Marini, Michela Spagnuolo, and Bianca Falcidieno. 2007. Structural shape prototypes for the automatic classification of 3D objects. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 4 (2007), 28--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Panagiotis Papadakis, Ioannis Pratikakis, Theoharis Theoharis, and Stavros Perantonis. 2010. PANORAMA: A 3D shape descriptor based on panoramic views for unsupervised 3D object retrieval. International Journal of Computer Vision 89, 2--3 (2010), 177--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Panagiotis Papadakis, Ioannis Pratikakis, Theodore Trafalis, Theoharis Theoharis, and Stavros Perantonis. 2008. Relevance Feedback in Content-based 3D Object Retrieval A Comparative Study. Computer-Aided Design and Applications 5, 5 (2008), 753--763.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Philip Shilane, Patrick Min, Michael Kazhdan, and Thomas Funkhouser. 2004. The Princeton shape benchmark. In Shape modeling applications, 2004. Proceedings. IEEE, 167--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Atsushi Tatsuma and Masaki Aono. 2009. Multi-Fourier spectra descriptor and augmentation with spectral clustering for 3D shape retrieval. The Visual Computer 25, 8 (Aug. 2009), 785--804. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Yaozhen Wang, Zhiwen Liu, Fengqian Pang, and Heng Li. 2015. Boosting 3D model retrieval with class vocabularies and distance vector revision. In TENCON 2015--2015 IEEE Region 10 Conference. IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Dong Xu and Hua Li. 2007. 3D shape retrieval integrated with classification information. In Image and Graphics, 2007. ICIG 2007. Fourth International Conference on. IEEE, 774--779. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Unsupervised 3D object retrieval with parameter-free hierarchical clustering

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CGI '17: Proceedings of the Computer Graphics International Conference
      June 2017
      260 pages
      ISBN:9781450352284
      DOI:10.1145/3095140

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate35of159submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader