skip to main content
10.1145/3097286.3097321acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmsocietyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Social Media Use by Government in Canada: Examining Interactions of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada on Twitter and Facebook

Published:28 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In 2011, the Government of Canada acknowledged the need to use social media to interact with the public for the first time. The Open Dialogue stream of initiatives within the Canada's Action Plan on Open Government called for a two-way dialogue between the Government of Canada and the public. Currently, the majority of government agencies use social media. However, they are still exploring methods for using these new tools as a part of existing communication channels. As recent studies suggest, government does not consider social media as a way to engage the public in public service delivery or policy-making, rather views it as a new means to provide information, much of which is already available on the government agencies' websites.

This paper examines how one of the federal government agencies, Immigration, Citizenship and Refugees Canada (IRCC), uses social media. As the analysis shows, IRCC interacts with the public by answering questions, providing information about its programs and services, and sharing information posted on other accounts. The findings indicate that (i) IRCC engages much more actively on Twitter than on Facebook; (ii) IRCC views Twitter as a way to answer questions that immigrants, students, workers, visitors to Canada as well as Canadian citizens and permanent residents might have about its programs and services and (iii) in general, IRCC does not seek opinions nor engage on policy development issues neither on Twitter nor on Facebook.

References

  1. Mergel, I. and Greeves B. Social Media in the Public Sector Field Guide: Designing and Implementing Strategies and Policies. Jossey-Bass/Wiley: San Francisco, CA, 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonson, E, Torres, L., Royo, S. and Flores, F. 2012. Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly 29,2 (Apr. 2012), 123--132Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Lathrop, D. and Ruma L. Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, 2010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Francoli, M. Independent Reporting Mechanism Canada: Progress Report 2012--13. Retrieved Jan 26, 2017 from http://www.opengovpartnership.org/sites/default/files/Canada_final_2012_Eng.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. McNutt, K. 2014. Public engagement in the Web 2.0 era: Social collaborative technologies in a public sector context. Canadian Public Administration. 57,1 (Mar. 2014), 49--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Craft, J. 2013 The Promise and Paradox of Open Government in the Harper Era in. Doerny G. B. and Stacey C. eds. How Ottawa Spends 2012-2013: The Harper Majority, Budget Cuts and the New Opposition, McGuill-Queen's University Press Montreal, QC, 2013, 209--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mergel, I. 2012. The social media innovation challenge in the public sector. Information Polity. 17, 3,4 (Jul. 2012) 281--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Roy, J. From Machinery to Mobility: Government and Democracy in a Participative Age. Springer Science and Business Media: New York, NY, 2013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunleavy, P., Margetts H., Bastow S. and Tinkler J. 2006. New Public Management is Dead: Long Live Digital Era Governance J-PART. 16,3 (Jul. 2006), 467--494.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Weerakkody, V. and Reddick C.G. Public Sector Transformation through E-government in Weerakkody, V. and Reddick C.G.Public, eds. Sector Transformation through E-Government: Experiences from Europe and North America Routledge: NY, 2013, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunleavy, P. and Margetts H. 2010. The Second Wave of Digital Era Governance. Prepared for the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2-5, 2010. Retrieved Jan 26, 2017 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1643850Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mickoleit, A. 2014. Social Media Use by Governments: A Policy Primer to Discuss Trends, Identify Policy Opportunities and Guide Decision Makers. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 26, OECD Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Linders, D. 2012. From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly. 29,4 (Oct 2012), 446--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan R. and Gil-Garcia J.R. 2013. Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly. 30,4 (Oct. 2013), 319--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Linders, D., Copeland Wilson, S. and Carlo Bertot, J. Open Government as a Vehicle for Government Transformation in Weerakkody, V. and Reddick C.G., eds. Public Sector Transformation through E-Government: Experiences from Europe and North America. Routledge: NY, 2013, 9--24Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mergel, I. Social Media in the Public Sector. A guide to participation, collaboration and transparency in the networked world. John Wiley & Sons: San Francisco, CA, 2013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Landsbergen, D. Government as Part of the Revolution: Using Social Media to Achieve Public Goals in Worrall L. ed Leading Issues in e-Government Research, Volume One, Academic Publishing International Ltd: Reading, UK, 2011, 147--172Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mergel, I. 2013. Designing a Social Media Strategy to Fulfill Your Agency's Mission. Public Manager. 42, 1 (Mar. 2013) 26--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Homburg, V. Understanding E-Government: Information systems in public administration. Routledge, NY, 2008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Henman, P. Governing Electronically: E-Government and the Reconfiguration of Public Administration, Policy and Power. Palgrave Macmillan: UK. 2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Meijer A., Burger N. and Ebbers W. Citizens2Citizens: Mapping Participatory Practices on the Internet" in Worrall L. ed Leading Issues in e-Government Research, Volume One, Academic Publishing International Ltd: Reading, UK, 2011, 173--203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Meijer, A. and Thaens, Marcel. 2013. "Social media strategies: Understanding the differences between North American police departments". Government Information Quarterly, 30,4 (Oct. 2013), 343--350Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Clarke, A. 2012. Open dialogue' and the Government of Canada's use of social media: bureaucratic barriers to democratic engagement in the digital age. Paper presented at the 2012 Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta June 14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Panagiotopoulos, P., Bigdeli, A. Z. and Sams, S. 2014. Citizen-government collaboration on social media: The case of Twitter in the 2011 riots in England. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 3 (Jul. 2014), 264--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Lu, B., Zhang, S., & Fan, W. 2016. Social representations of social media use in government: An analysis of Chinese government microblogging from citizens' perspective. Social Science Computer Review, 34,4 (Aug. 2016) 416--436. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Chase, Steven. 2012. Canada needs to get competitive to attract skilled immigrants: Harper, The Globe and Mail. Retrieved on Jan 26, 2017 http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/canada-needs-to-get-competitive-to-attract-skilled-immigrants-harper/article5179369Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Akbari, A. and MacDonald, M. 2014. Immigration policy in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Sates: An overview of recent trends. International Migration Review 48,3 (Sept. 2014), 801--822.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada. 2017. Departmental Overview Retrieved on Jan 26, 2017 http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/departmental-overview.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada. 2017. Terms and Conditions. Retrieved on Jan 26, 2017 http://www.cic.gc.ca/English/notices.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Gruzd, A. 2016. Netlytic: Software for Automated Text and Social Network Analysis. Available at http://Netlytic.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Rieder, B. 2013. Studying Facebook via data extraction: the Netvizz application. In: WebSci'13 proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, 346--355. New York: ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Social Media Use by Government in Canada: Examining Interactions of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada on Twitter and Facebook

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      #SMSociety17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society
      July 2017
      414 pages
      ISBN:9781450348478
      DOI:10.1145/3097286

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 July 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      #SMSociety17 Paper Acceptance Rate58of142submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate78of189submissions,41%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader