skip to main content
10.1145/3097286.3097339acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmsocietyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Idols of Promotion: The Triumph of Self-Branding in the Social Media Age

Published:28 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

YouTube stars, Instagram influencers, and other social media personalities have achieved an elevated status in the popular imagination. This work-in-progress situates the valourization of digital fame in a socio-historical context, invoking critical theorist Leo Lowenthal's [20] "mass idols" framework. Examining the content of magazine biographies in the decades preceding World War II, Lowenthal identified a marked shift in cultural exemplars of success: from self-made entrepreneurs, politicians, and other "Idols of Production"---to the stars of cinema and sports, "Idols of Consumption." As an extension of Lowenthal's analysis, we examine contemporary magazine biographies (in People and Time) and self-authored social media bios (on Instagram and Twitter). Based on a preliminary analysis of the magazine content and social-media profiles---including the crucial shift to self-authorship---we outline a new generation of what we call "Idols of Promotion." These digitally networked public figures, we argue, straddle the realms of production and consumption as they labor to create and project a distinctive self-brand. We identify three key tropes that shape narrativizations of idols in the social media age: (1) a spirit of self-enterprise that crosses industry boundaries; (2) a promise of meritocracy; and (3) a call to express oneself authentically. After examining these tropes, we conclude with an examination of their ideological function: such mediated hero-worship, we contend, indexes larger anxieties about the individualization of work amidst a precarious economy.

References

  1. Bauman, Z. 2013. Liquid Times: Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Polity, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, U. 2001. Living your own life in a runaway world: Individualisation, globalisation and politics. In On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism, W. Hutton and A. Giddens, Eds. Vintage, London, UK, 164--174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bieber, J. 2017. Twitter. https://twitter.com/justinbieberhttps://twitter.com/justinbieberGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carnegie, D. 1936. How to Win Friends and Influence People. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiu, M. 2016. I'm the happiest I've ever been! People (Oct. 24, 2016), 63--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D'Addario, D. 2015. Tyler Oakley. Time (Nov. 9, 2015), 58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D'Addario, D. 2015. Hollywood's new domestic divas. Time (Jun. 15, 2015), 48--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. DeGeneris, E. 2017. Twitter. https://twitter.com/TheEllenShowGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Duffy, B. E. forthcoming. (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Duffy, B. E. and Hund, E. 2015. 'Having it all' on social media: Entrepreneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media + Society, 1, 2 (Sep. 2015), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dyball, R. 2016. Going for gold. People (Feb. 15, 2016), 76--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gomez, S. 2017. Twitter. https://twitter.com/selenagomezGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hearn, A. 2008. Meat, mask, burden: Probing the contours of the branded self. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8, 197--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hearn, A. 2010. Through the looking glass: The promotional university, 2.0. In Blowing up the Brand, M. Aronczyk and D. Powers, Eds. Peter Lang, New York, NY, 195--217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Illouz, E. 2003. Redeeming consumption: On Lowenthal's 'The Triumph of the Mass Idols'. In Canonic Texts in Media Research, E. Katz, J. D. Peters, T. Liebes, and A. Orloff, Eds. Polity, Cambridge, UK, 90--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Instagram. 2016. 600 million and counting (Dec. 15 2016). http://blog.instagram.com/post/154506585127/161215-600millionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jenner, K. 2017. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/kyliejenner/?hl=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kardashian West, K. 2017. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/kimkardashian/?hl=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lansky, S. 2016. The self-help sage of Snapchat. Time (May 16, 2016), 46--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lowenthal, L. 1944. Biographies in popular magazines. In Radio Research, 1942-43, P. F. Lazarsfeld and F. Stanton, Eds. Duell, Sloan, and Pearce, New York, NY, 507--548.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Luscombe, B. 2015. YouTube's view master. Time (Sep. 7-14, 2015), 70--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Marwick, A. 2013. Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Self-Branding in Web 2.0. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Marwick, A. and boyd, d. 2011. To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence, 17, 2 (May 2011), 139--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Morgan, G. and Nelligan, P. (2015). Labile labour: Gender, flexibility and creative work. The Sociological Review, 63, S1, 66--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Obama, B. 2017. Twitter.https://twitter.com/BarackObamaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. People magazine. 2016. 2016 Rate Card. http://static.people.com/people/static/mediakit/media/pdf/ratecard.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Perry, K. 2017. Twitter.https://twitter.com/katyperryGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Peters, T. 1997. The brand called you. Fast Company (Aug. 31, 1997). http://www.fastcompany.com/28905/brand-called-youGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Pooley, J. 2010. The consuming self: From flappers to Facebook. In Blowing up the Brand, M. Aronczyk and D. Powers, Eds. Peter Lang, New York, NY, 71--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Randle, Q. 2001. A historical overview of the effects of new mass media on magazine publishing during the 20th century. First Monday, 6, 9 (Sep. 2001).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Samuelson, K. 2016. The online conquistador. Time (Oct. 6, 2016). http://time.com/4518806/el-rubius-next-generation-leaders/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Social Blade. 2017. Top 100 Instagram profiles. https://socialblade.com/instagram/top/100/followersGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Strohm, E. 2016. Finding laughter after tragedy, People (Mar. 14, 2016), 71--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Time magazine. 2016. Advertising rates. http://www.timemediakit.com/2016-advertising-rates/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Triggs, C. 2016. Life, love & having it all. People (Jul. 18, 2016), 54--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Twitter Counter. 2017. Twitter Top 100 most followers in United States. http://twittercounter.com/pages/100/unitedstatesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Twitter, Inc. 2017. Company. https://about.twitter.com/companyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Idols of Promotion: The Triumph of Self-Branding in the Social Media Age

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      #SMSociety17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society
      July 2017
      414 pages
      ISBN:9781450348478
      DOI:10.1145/3097286

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 July 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      #SMSociety17 Paper Acceptance Rate58of142submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate78of189submissions,41%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader