skip to main content
10.1145/3097983.3098051acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Not All Passes Are Created Equal: Objectively Measuring the Risk and Reward of Passes in Soccer from Tracking Data

Published:13 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In soccer, the most frequent event that occurs is a pass. For a trained eye, there are a myriad of adjectives which could describe this event (e.g., "majestic pass", "conservative" to "poor-ball"). However, as these events are needed to be coded live and in real-time (most often by human annotators), the current method of grading passes is restricted to the binary labels 0 (unsuccessful) or 1 (successful). Obviously, this is sub-optimal because the quality of a pass needs to be measured on a continuous spectrum (i.e., 0 to 100%) and not a binary value. Additionally, a pass can be measured across multiple dimensions, namely: i) risk -- the likelihood of executing a pass in a given situation, and ii) reward -- the likelihood of a pass creating a chance. In this paper, we show how we estimate both the risk and reward of a pass across two seasons of tracking data captured from a recent professional soccer league with state-of-the-art performance, then showcase various use cases of our deployed passing system.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

power_tracking_data.mp4

mp4

433.9 MB

References

  1. A. Bialkowski, P. Lucey, P. Carr, Y. Yue, S. Sridharan, and year=2014 I. Matthews, booktitle=ICDM. Large-scale analysis of soccer matches using spatiotemporal tracking data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Brooks, M. Kerr, and J. Gutag. 2016. Developing a Data-Driven Player Ranking in Soccer Using Predictive Model Weights. In KDD . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Daniel Cervone, Alex D'Amour, Luke Bornn, and Kirk Goldsberry. 2016. A Multiresolution Stochastic Process Model for Predicting Basketball Possession Outcomes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 111, 514 (2016), 585--599. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. L. Gyarmati and X. Anguera. 2015. Automatic Extraction of the Passing Strategies of Soccer Teams. In KDD Workshop on Large-Scale Sports Analytics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. L. Gyarmati and R. Stanojevic. 2016. QPass: a Merit-based Evaluation of Soccer Passes. In KDD Workshop on Large-Scale Sports Analytics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Horton, J. Gudmundsson, S. Chawla, and J. Estephan. 2014. Classification of passes in football matches using spatiotemporal data. In KDD Workshop on Large-Scale Sports Analytics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D. Link, S. Lang, and P. Seidenschwarz. 2016. Real Time Quantification of Dangerousity in Football Using Spatiotemporal Tracking Data. PLoS ONE (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Lucey, A. Bialkowski, P. Carr, E. Foote, and I. Matthews. 2012. Characterizing Multi-Agent Team Behavior from Partial Team Tracings: Evidence from the English Premier League.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. P. Lucey, D. Oliver, P. Carr, J. Roth, and I. Matthews. 2013. Assessing team strategy using spatiotemporal data. In KDD. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. I McHale and L Szczepanski. 2015. Beyond completion rate: evaluating passing ability of footballers. Royal Statistical Society, Series A. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Monfort P. Carr P. Lucey, A. Bialkowski and I. Matthews. 2015. Quality vs Quantity: Improved shot prediction in soccer using strategic features from spatiotemporal data. In MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Marti Perarnau. 2014. Pep Confidential: Inside Pep Guardiola's First Season at Bayern Munich. Birlinn.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Skyes and N. Paine. 2016. How One Man's Bad Math Helped Ruin Decades Of English Soccer. (2016). https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/ how-one-mans-bad-math-helped-ruin-decades-of-english-soccer/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. T. Taki and J. Hasegawa. 2000. Visualization of dominant region in team games and its application to teamwork analysis. In Computer Graphics International. 227--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Qing Wang, Hengshu Zhu, Wei Hu, Zhiyong Shen, and Yuan Yao. 2015. Discerning Tactical Patterns for Professional Soccer Teams: An Enhanced Topic Model with Applications. In KDDGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Not All Passes Are Created Equal: Objectively Measuring the Risk and Reward of Passes in Soccer from Tracking Data

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            KDD '17: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
            August 2017
            2240 pages
            ISBN:9781450348874
            DOI:10.1145/3097983

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 13 August 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            KDD '17 Paper Acceptance Rate64of748submissions,9%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

            Upcoming Conference

            KDD '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader