skip to main content
10.1145/3097983.3098121acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"The Leicester City Fairytale?": Utilizing New Soccer Analytics Tools to Compare Performance in the 15/16 & 16/17 EPL Seasons

Published:13 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The last two years have been somewhat of a rollercoaster for English Premier League (EPL) team Leicester City. In the 2015/16 season, against all odds and logic, they won the league to much fan-fare. Fast-forward nine months later, and they are battling relegation. What could describe this fluctuating form? As soccer is a very complex and strategic game, common statistics (e.g., passes, shots, possession) do not really tell the full story on how a team succeeds and fails. However, using machine learning tools and a plethora of data, it is now possible to obtain some insights into how a team performs. To showcase the utility of these new tools (i.e., expected goal value, expected save value, strategy-plots and passing quality measures), we first analyze the EPL 2015/16 season which a specific emphasis on the champions Leicester City, and then compare it to the current one. Finally, we show how these features can be used to predict future performance.

References

  1. Matias Grez. 2016. Champions Leicester City: 7 reasons why Foxes won Premier League title. http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/03/football/leicester-city-champions-reasons-premier-league. (04 May 2016). shownote[Online; accessed 01-February-2017].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Michael Horton, Joachim Gudmundsson, Sanjay Chawla, and Joël Estephan 2014. Classification of passes in football matches using spatiotemporal data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.5093 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Thom Lawrence. 2015. Expected saves. https://deepxg.com/2015/10/20/expected-saves. (20 October 2015). [Online; accessed 01-February-2017].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Lucey, A. Bialkowski, M. Monfort, P. Carr, and I. Matthews 2015. Quality vs Quantity: Improved Shot Prediction in Soccer using Strategic Features from Spatiotemporal Data. In Proc. 9th Annual MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conferenc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Burr Settles. 2010. Active learning literature survey. University of Wisconsin, Madison Vol. 52, 55--66 (2010), 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Peter Smith. 2016. Leicester City win Premier League: How they did it differently. http://www.skysports.com/football/news/30385/10267972/leicester-win-premier-league-how-they-did-it-differently. (03 May 2016). [Online; accessed 01-February-2017].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Łukasz Szczepański and Ian McHale 2016. Beyond completion rate: evaluating the passing ability of footballers. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 179, 2 (2016), 513--533. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Mark Taylor. 2014. How to calculate expected goal models. https://www.pinnacle.com/en/betting-articles/soccer/how-to-calculate-goal-models. (22 August 2014). [Online; accessed 01-February-2017].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Colin Trainor. 2014. Goalkeepers: How repeatable are shot saving performances? http://statsbomb.com/2014/10/goalkeepers-how-repeatable-are-shot-saving-performances. (21 October 2014). [Online; accessed 01-February-2017].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yuji Yamamoto and Keiko Yokoyama 2011. Common and unique network dynamics in football games. PloS one, Vol. 6, 12 (2011), e29638. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. "The Leicester City Fairytale?": Utilizing New Soccer Analytics Tools to Compare Performance in the 15/16 & 16/17 EPL Seasons

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        KDD '17: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
        August 2017
        2240 pages
        ISBN:9781450348874
        DOI:10.1145/3097983

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 August 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        KDD '17 Paper Acceptance Rate64of748submissions,9%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader