skip to main content
10.1145/3098243.3098271acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswisecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

PHY-layer security is no alternative to cryptography

Published:18 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent works, numerous physical-layer security systems have been proposed as alternatives to classic cryptography. Such systems aim to use the intrinsic properties of radio signals and the wireless medium to provide confidentiality and authentication to wireless devices. However, fundamental vulnerabilities are often discovered in these systems shortly after their inception. We therefore challenge the assumptions made by existing physical-layer security systems, and postulate that weaker assumptions are needed in order to adapt for practical scenarios. We also argue that if no computational advantage over an adversary can be ensured, secure communication cannot be realistically achieved.

References

  1. O. R. Afolabi, K. Kim, and A. Ahmad. On secure spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks using emitters electromagnetic signature. In Proceedings of 18th Internatonal Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, pages 1--5. IEEE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Anand, S.-J. Lee, and E. W. Knightly. Strobe: Actively securing wireless communications using zero-forcing beamforming. In INFOCOM, pages 720--728. IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. B. Danev, T. S. Heydt-Benjamin, and S. Capkun. Physical-layer Identification of RFID Devices. In Usenix Security Symposium, pages 199--214, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. Danev, H. Luecken, S. Capkun, and K. El Defrawy. Attacks on physical-layer identification. In Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Wireless network security, pages 89--98. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Danev, D. Zanetti, and S. Capkun. On physical-layer identification of wireless devices. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(1):6, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Dong, Z. Han, A. P. Petropulu, and H. V. Poor. Cooperative jamming for wireless physical layer security. In IEEE/SP 15th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing, pages 417--420. IEEE, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Gollakota, H. Hassanieh, B. Ransford, D. Katabi, and K. Fu. They can hear your heartbeats: non-invasive security for implantable medical devices. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 41(4):2--13, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Hall, M. Barbeau, and E. Kranakis. Enhancing intrusion detection in wireless networks using radio frequency fingerprinting. In Communications, Internet, and Information Technology, pages 201--206, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. B. W. Ramsey, T. D. Stubbs, B. E. Mullins, M. A. Temple, and M. A. Buckner. Wireless infrastructure protection using low-cost radio frequency fingerprinting receivers. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 8:27--39, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. W. Ramsey, M. A. Temple, and B. E. Mullins. PHY foundation for multi-factor ZigBee node authentication. In Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pages 795--800. IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. K. B. Rasmussen and S. Capkun. Implications of radio fingerprinting on the security of sensor networks. In Third International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communications Networks, pages 331--340. IEEE, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. U. Rehman, K. Sowerby, and C. Coghill. RF fingerprint extraction from the energy envelope of an instantaneous transient signal. In Australian Communications Theory Workshop (AusCTW), pages 90--95. IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. D. R. Reising, M. A. Temple, and M. J. Mendenhall. Improving intra-cellular security using air monitoring with RF fingerprints. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pages 1--6. IEEE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Schulz, A. Loch, and M. Hollick. Practical Known-Plaintext Attacks against Physical Layer Security in Wireless MIMO Systems. In NDSS, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. N. O. Tippenhauer, L. Malisa, A. Ranganathan, and S. Capkun. On limitations of friendly jamming for confidentiality. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pages 160--173. IEEE, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. O. Ureten and N. Serinken. Wireless security through RF fingerprinting. Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 32(1):27--33, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Q. Wang, K. Xu, and K. Ren. Cooperative secret key generation from phase estimation in narrowband fading channels. IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications, 30(9):1666--1674, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. D. Wyner. The wire-tap channel. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 54(8):1355--1387, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Yener and S. Ulukus. Wireless physical-layer security: lessons learned from information theory. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(10):1814--1825, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. K. Zeng. Physical layer key generation in wireless networks: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(6):33--39, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Y. Zheng, M. Schulz, W. Lou, Y. T. Hou, and M. Hollick. Profiling the strength of physical-layer security: A study in orthogonal blinding. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Security & Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks, pages 21--30. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. PHY-layer security is no alternative to cryptography

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WiSec '17: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks
        July 2017
        297 pages
        ISBN:9781450350846
        DOI:10.1145/3098243

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 July 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate98of338submissions,29%

        Upcoming Conference

        WiSec '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader