skip to main content
10.1145/3098279.3098538acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

EarTouch: turning the ear into an input surface

Published:04 September 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose EarTouch, a new sensing technology for ear-based input for controlling applications by slightly pulling the ear and detecting the deformation by an enhanced earphone device. It is envisioned that EarTouch will enable control of applications such as music players, navigation systems, and calendars as an "eyes-free" interface. As for the operation of EarTouch, the shape deformation of the ear is measured by optical sensors. Deformation of the skin caused by touching the ear with the fingers is recognized by attaching optical sensors to the earphone and measuring the distance from the earphone to the skin inside the ear. EarTouch supports recognition of multiple gestures by applying a support vector machine (SVM). EarTouch was validated through a set of user studies.

References

  1. earable. http://www.earable.jp/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Yuichiro Kojima, Yuki Hashimoto, Shogo Fukushima, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2009. Pull-navi: a novel tactile navigation interface by pulling the ears. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Emerging Technologies (SIGGRAPH '09). ACM, Article 19, 1 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chris Harrison, Desney Tan, and Dan Morris. 2010. Skinput: appropriating the body as an input surface. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, 453--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Naoya Koizumi, Hidekazu Tanaka, Yuji Uema, and Masahiko Inami. 2011. Chewing jockey: augmented food texture by using sound based on the cross-modal effect. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '11), ACM, Article 21, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gierad Laput, Xiang 'Anthony' Chen, and Chris Harrison. 2016. SweepSense: Ad Hoc Configuration Sensing Using Reflected Swept-Frequency Ultrasonics. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '16). ACM, 332--335. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Roman Lissermann, Jochen Huber, Aristotelis Hadjakos, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2014. EarPut: augmenting ear-worn devices for ear-based interaction. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design (OzCHI '14). ACM, 300--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hiroyuki Manabe and Masaaki Fukumoto. 2006. Full-time wearable headphone-type gaze detector. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '06). ACM, 1073--1078. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Katsutoshi Masai, Yuta Sugiura, Masa Ogata, Kai Kunze, Masahiko Inami, and Maki Sugimoto. 2016. Facial Expression Recognition in Daily Life by Embedded Photo Reflective Sensors on Smart Eyewear. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '16). ACM, 317--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kohei Matsumura, Daisuke Sakamoto, Masahiko Inami, and Takeo Igarashi. 2012. Universal earphones: earphones with automatic side and shared use detection. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '12). ACM, 305--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Christian Metzger, Matt Anderson, and Thad Starner. 2004. FreeDigiter: a contact-free device for gesture control, In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC '04). IEEE, 18--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hiromi Nakamura and Homei Miyashita. 2010. Control of augmented reality information volume by glabellar fader. In Proceedings of the 1st Augmented Human International Conference (AH '10). ACM, Article 20, 3 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kei Nakatsuma, Hiroyuki Shinoda, Yasutoshi Makino, Katsunari Sato, and Takashi Maeno. 2011. Touch interface on back of the hand. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Emerging Technologies (SIGGRAPH '11). ACM, Article 19, 1 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Masa Ogata, Yuta Sugiura, Yasutoshi Makino, Masahiko Inami, and Michita Imai. 2013. SenSkin: adapting skin as a soft interface. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '13). ACM, 539--544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. PSVM: Support Vector Machines for Processing. http://makematics.com/code/psvm/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Marcos Serrano, Barrett M. Ens, and Pourang P. Irani. 2014. Exploring the use of hand-to-face input for interacting with head-worn displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, 3181--3190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Julia Schwarz, Chris Harrison, Scott Hudson, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2010. Cord input: an intuitive, high-accuracy, multi-degree-of-freedom input method for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, 1657--1660. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Martin Weigel, Vikram Mehta, and Jürgen Steimle. 2014. More than touch: understanding how people use skin as an input surface for mobile computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, 179--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Martin Weigel, Tong Lu, Gilles Bailly, Antti Oulasvirta, Carmel Majidi, and Jürgen Steimle. 2015. iSkin: Flexible, Stretchable and Visually Customizable On-Body Touch Sensors for Mobile Computing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, 2991--3000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Andrew D. Wilson, and Yang Li. 2007. Gestures without libraries, toolkits or training: a $1 recognizer for user interface prototypes. In Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '07). ACM, 159--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. EarTouch: turning the ear into an input surface

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '17: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
      September 2017
      874 pages
      ISBN:9781450350754
      DOI:10.1145/3098279

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 September 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MobileHCI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate45of224submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader