skip to main content
10.1145/3099564.3099577acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesscaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Modeling and data-driven parameter estimation for woven fabrics

Published:28 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Accurate estimation of mechanical parameters for simulation of woven fabrics is essential in many fields. To facilitate this we first present a new orthotropic hyperelastic constitutive model for woven fabrics. Next, we design an experimental protocol for characterizing real fabrics based on commercially available tests. Finally, we create a method for accurately fitting the material parameters to the experimental data. The last step is accomplished by solving inverse problems based on a Catmull-Clark subdivision finite element discretization of the Kirchhoff-Love equations for thin shells. Using this approach we are able to reproduce the fully nonlinear behavior corresponding to the captured data with a small number of parameters while maintaining all fundamental invariants from continuum mechanics. The resulting constitutive model can be used with any discretization (e.g., simple triangle meshes) and not just subdivision finite elements. We illustrate the entire process with results for five types of fabric and compare photo reference of the real fabrics to the simulated equivalents.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Y. Başar, M. Itskov, and A. Eckstein. 2000. Composite laminates: nonlinear interlaminar stress analysis by multi-layer shell elements. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 185, 2--4 (2000), 367--397. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Kiran S. Bhat, Christopher D. Twigg, Jessica K. Hodgins, Pradeep K. Khosla, Zoran Popović, and Steven M. Seitz. 2003. Estimating Cloth Simulation Parameters from Video. In Proc 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symp Comp Anim (SCA '03). Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 37--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Robert Bridson, Sebastian Marino, and Ronald Fedkiw. 2003. Simulation of clothing with folds and wrinkles. In SCA '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation. Eurographics Association, 28--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fehmi Cirak and Michael Ortiz. 2001. Fully C1-conforming subdivision elements for finite deformation thin-shell analysis. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 51, 7 (2001), 813--833. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Fehmi Cirak, Michael Ortiz, and Peter Schröder. 2000. Subdivision surfaces: A new paradigm for thin-shell finite-element analysis. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 47, 12 (2000), 2039--2072. <2039::AID-NME872>3.0.CO;2-1 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gabriel Cirio, Jorge Lopez-Moreno, David Miraut, and Miguel A. Otaduy. 2014. Yarn-level Simulation of Woven Cloth. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 6, Article 207 (Nov. 2014), 11 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. David Clyde, Joseph Teran, and Rasmus Tamstorf. 2017. Simulation of nonlinear Kirchhoff-Love thin shells using subdivision finite elements. (2017). Supplemental technical document.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. N. E. Cooper. 1963. A Bias Extension Test. Textile Research Journal 33, 4 (1963), 315--317. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Samia Dridi, Abdelwaheb Dogui, and Philipp Boisse. 2011. Finite element analysis of bias extension test using an orthotropic hyperelastic continuum model for woven fabric. The Journal of The Textile Institute 102, 9 (2011), 781--789. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Tushar K. Ghosh and Naiyue Zhou. 2003. Characterization of fabric bending behavior: A review of measurement principles. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research 28, 4 (2003), 471--476. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/22691Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Michael B. Giles and Niles A. Pierce. 2000. An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 65, 3 (2000), 393--415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Eitan Grinspun, Anil N. Hirani, Mathieu Desbrun, and Peter Schröder. 2003. Discrete shells. In SCA '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation. Eurographics Association, 62--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Hursa, T. Rolich, and S. Ercegović Ražić. 2009. Determining Pseudo Poisson's Ratio of Woven Fabric with a Digital Image Correlation Method. Textile Research Journal 79, 17 (2009), 1588--1598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mikhail Itskov. 2001. A generalized orthotropic hyperelastic material model with application to incompressible shells. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 50, 8 (2001), 1777--1799. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jonathan M. Kaldor, Doug L. James, and Steve Marschner. 2008. Simulating Knitted Cloth at the Yarn Level. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 3, Article 65 (Aug. 2008), 9 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sueo Kawabata. 1980. The Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation (2nd edition ed.). The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, Osaka, Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Josef Kiendl, Ming-Chen Hsu, Michael C.H. Wu, and Alessandro Reali. 2015. Isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shell formulations for general hyperelastic materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 291 (2015), 280--303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. J. King, P. Jearanaisilawong, and S. Socrate. 2005. A continuum constitutive model for the mechanical behavior of woven fabrics. International Journal of Solids and Structures 42, 13 (2005), 3867--3896. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Yijing Li and Jernej Barbič. 2014. Stable Orthotropic Materials. In ACM SIGGRAPH / Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA '14), Vladlen Koltun and Eftychios Sifakis (Eds.). The Eurographics Association, 41--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. R. G. Livesey and J. D. Owen. 1964. Cloth Stiffness and Hysteresis in Bending. Journal of the Textile Institute Transactions 55, 10 (1964), T516--T530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Christiane Luible and Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann. 2008. The Simulation of Cloth Using Accurate Physical Parameters. In Proceedings of the Tenth IASTED International Conference on Computer Graphics and Imaging (CGIM '08). ACTA Press, Anaheim, CA, USA, 123--128. http://www.miralab.ch/bibliography/431.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann, Christiane Luible, Pascal Volino, and Etienne Lyard. 2007. From Measured Fabric to the Simulation of Cloth. In Computer-Aided Design and Computer Graphics, 2007 10th IEEE International Conference on. 7--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. E. Miguel, D. Bradley, B. Thomaszewski, B. Bickel, W. Matusik, M. A. Otaduy, and S. Marschner. 2012. Data-Driven Estimation of Cloth Simulation Models. Computer Graphics Forum 31, 2pt2 (May 2012), 519--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Eder Miguel, David Miraut, and Miguel A. Otaduy. 2016. Modeling and Estimation of Energy-Based Hyperelastic Objects. Computer Graphics Forum 35, 2 (2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Eder Miguel, Rasmus Tamstorf, Derek Bradley, Sara C. Schvartzman, Bernhard Thomaszewski, Bernd Bickel, Wojciech Matusik, Steve Marschner, and Miguel A. Otaduy. 2013. Modeling and Estimation of Internal Friction in Cloth. ACM T Trans. Graph. 32, 6, Article 212 (Nov. 2013), 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Pier Giorgio Minazio. 1995. FAST - Fabric Assurance by Simple Testing. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 7, 2/3 (1995), 43--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. R. W. Ogden. 1972. Large Deformation Isotropic Elasticity - On the Correlation of Theory and Experiment for Incompressible Rubberlike Solids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 326, 1567 (1972), 565--584. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. F. T. Peirce. 1930. The "Handle" of Cloth as a Measurable Quantity. Journal of the Textile Institute Transactions 21, 9 (1930), T377--T416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Jess Power. 2013. Fabric objective measurements for commercial 3D virtual garment simulation. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 25, 6 (2013), 423--439. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Hansun Ryou, Kwansoo Chung, and Woong-Ryeol Yu. 2007. Constitutive modeling of woven composites considering asymmetric/anisotropic, rate dependent, and nonlinear behavior. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 38, 12 (2007), 2500--2510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Olaf Schenk and Klaus Gärtner. 2006. On fast factorization pivoting methods for sparse symmetric indefinite systems. ETNA. Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis [electronic only] 23 (2006), 158--179. http://eudml.org/doc/127439Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Huiyu Sun, Ning Pan, and Ron Postle. 2005. On the Poisson's ratios of a woven fabric. Composite Structures 68, 4 (2005), 505--510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Bernhard Thomaszewski, Markus Wacker, and Wolfgang Straßer. 2006. A Consistent Bending Model for Cloth Simulation with Corotational Subdivision Finite Elements. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA '06). Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 107--116. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1218064.1218079Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Pascal Volino and Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann. 2007. Stop-and-go cloth draping. The Visual Computer 23, 9 (2007), 669--677. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Pascal Volino, Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann, and Francois Faure. 2009. A simple approach to nonlinear tensile stiffness for accurate cloth simulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, Article 105 (September 2009), 16 pages. Issue 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Huamin Wang, James F. O'Brien, and Ravi Ramamoorthi. 2011. Data-Driven Elastic Models for Cloth: Modeling and Measurement. ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH 2011) 30, 4, Article 71 (Aug. 2011), 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. X. Wang, X. Liu, and C.Hurren Deakin. 2008. Physical and mechanical testing of textiles. In Fabric Testing, Jinlian Hu (Ed.). Woodhead Publishing, Chapter 4, 90--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Anna Wawrzinek, Klaus Hildebrandt, and Konrad Polthier. 2011. Koiter's Thin Shells on Catmull-Clark Limit Surfaces. In Vision, Modeling, and Visualization (2011), Peter Eisert, Joachim Hornegger, and Konrad Polthier (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Robert W. Williams. 2010. Measuring and modeling the anisotropic, nonlinear and hysteretic behavior of woven fabrics. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Iowa. http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/907Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Hongyi Xu, Funshing Sin, Yufeng Zhu, and Jernej Barbič. 2015. Nonlinear Material Design Using Principal Stretches. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 4, Article 75 (July 2015), 11 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Q.-S. Zheng. 1993. On transversely isotropic, orthotropic and relative isotropic functions of symmetric tensors, skew-symmetric tensors and vectors. Part I: Two dimensional orthotropic and relative isotropic functions and three dimensional relative isotropic functions. International Journal of Engineering Science 31, 10 (1993), 1399--1409. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Modeling and data-driven parameter estimation for woven fabrics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SCA '17: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH / Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation
      July 2017
      212 pages
      ISBN:9781450350914
      DOI:10.1145/3099564

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 July 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate183of487submissions,38%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader