ABSTRACT
Nowadays cars are equipped with technologies that are getting more and more sophisticated. Due to this increase of such technologies, driver distractions have incredibly grown and they are more and more studied. In cognitive science, numerous studies show how, when a user interacts with two concurrent tasks, the cognitive load of one of them may influence negatively the interaction with the others.
In this paper we consider infotainment system in the context of both human computer interaction and cognitive science, to study how an increase in the cognitive load of the infotainment systems may lead to a lack of attention to the driving task and may lead to fatal consequences. We propose a cognitive model in rewriting logic which will be used to model a case study of a user simultaneously using an infotainment system and driving.
- Pierre Barrouillet, Sophie Bernardin, and Valérie Camos. 2004. Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133, 1 (2004), 83.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Antonio Cerone. 2016. A cognitive framework based on rewriting logic for the analysis of interactive systems. In International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods. Springer, 287--303. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jan W de Fockert, Geraint Rees, Christopher D Frith, and Nilli Lavie. 2001. The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science 291, 5509 (2001), 1803--1806.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tim Horberry, Janet Anderson, Michael A Regan, Thomas J Triggs, and John Brown. 2006. Driver distraction: The effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention 38, 1 (2006), 185--191. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nilli Lavie, Aleksandra Hirst, Jan W De Fockert, and Essi Viding. 2004. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133, 3 (2004), 339.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harold Pashler. 1994. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological bulletin 116, 2 (1994), 220.Google Scholar
- David L Strayer and William A Johnston. 2001. Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychological science 12, 6 (2001), 462--466. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christopher D Wickens. 1991. Processing resources and attention. Multiple-task performance 1991 (1991), 3--34.Google Scholar
- Kristie Young, Michael Regan, and M Hammer. 2007. Driver distraction: A review of the literature. Distracted driving (2007), 379--405.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Model-based analysis of driver distraction by infotainment systems in automotive domain
Recommendations
InShift: A Shifting Infotainment System to Enhance Co-Driver Experience and Collaboration
AutomotiveUI '21 Adjunct: 13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsCar manufacturers introduced a variety of non-driving-related features to enhance the trip experience for drivers and passengers. However, using an in-vehicle infotainment system (IVIS) can be mentally demanding and cause driver distraction. In addition,...
A survey on vision-based driver distraction analysis
AbstractMotor vehicle crashes are great threats to our life, which may result in numerous fatalities, as well as tremendous economic and societal costs. Driver inattention, either distraction or fatigue, is the major cause among human factors ...
Driver Distraction Assessment Using Driver Modeling
SMC '13: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and CyberneticsCharacterizing individual human drivers is of increasing interest for applications like adaptive driver assistance or monitoring. Describing the human driver by means of control-theoretic driver models constitutes a promising approach. In this paper, we ...
Comments