skip to main content
10.1145/3105726.3106185acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Understanding the "Teacher Experience" in Primary and Secondary CS Professional Development

Published:14 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The increasing awareness for the need of effective Computer Science Education (CSE) Professional Development (PD) at the K-12 grade levels has been demonstrated by the increase in grant funding for CSE PD programs, public awareness campaigns by industry, and scale-up initiatives in schools. While the increase in funding has led to increasing availability of PD programs, funding alone does not guarantee a successful experience for teachers. This study investigates the affective experiences of a cohort of ten in-service teachers (nine middle school and one high school) as they participate in an intensive, multi-faceted summer CSE PD program at a Midwestern metropolitan university in North America. Teachers' experiences were documented in their written daily journals, which were analyzed qualitatively using thematic and sentiment analysis techniques. We find five cognitive themes that recurred throughout the program along with sentiment values associated with daily activities. Through the examination of these results, recommendations regarding how to best engage teachers by understanding their concerns and affective responses are included to help design more effective CSE PD implementations.

References

  1. Beverley Bell and John Gilbert. 1994. Teacher development as professional, personal, and social development. Teaching and teacher education 10, 5 (1994), 483--497. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Vrushali K. Bongirwar. 2015. A Survey on Sentence Level Sentiment Analysis. International Journal of Computer Science Trends and Technology (IJCST) 3 (2015), 110--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Xianglei Chen. 2013. STEM Attrition: College Students' Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001. National Center for Education Statistics (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Christopher Day and Judyth Sachs. 2005. International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Christopher Day, Judyth Sachs, C. Day, and J. Sachs. 2004. Professionalism, performativity and empowerment: discourses in the politics, policies and purposes of continuing professional development. International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (2004), 3--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Rekha Dhingra and Bijender K. Punia. 2016. Relational Analysis of Emotional Intelligence and Change Management: A Suggestive Model for Enriching Change Management Skills. Vision 20, 4 (2016), 312--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. John M. Dirkx. 2001. The power of feelings: Emotion, imagination, and the construction of meaning in adult learning. New directions for adult and continuing education 2001, 89 (2001), 63--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. John M. Dirkx. 2008. The meaning and role of emotions in adult learning. New directions for adult and continuing education 2008, 120 (2008), 7--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Carina Girvan, Claire Conneely, and Brendan Tangney. 2016. Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 58 (2016), 129--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Daniel Goleman. 2006. Emotional intelligence. Bantam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Joanna Goode, Jane Margolis, and Gail Chapman. 2014. Curriculum is not enough: The educational theory and research foundation of the exploring computer science professional development model. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, 493-- Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Thomas R. Guskey. 2002. Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and teaching 8, 3 (2002), 381--391. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Andy Hargreaves. 2005. The emotions of teaching and educational change. Springer, 278--295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver. 2004. Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational psychology review 16, 3 (2004), 235--Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Peter Kahn and Karen O'Rourke. 2005. Understanding enquiry-based learning. Handbook of enquiry and problem-based learning Irish case studies and international perspectives. Dublin: Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, NUI Galway & All Ireland Society for Higher Education (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Muhsin Menekse. 2015. Computer science teacher professional development in the United States: a review of studies published between 2004 and 2014. Computer Science Education 25, 4 (10/02 2015), 325--350. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 08993408.2015.1111645 doi: 10.1080/08993408.2015.1111645. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Johannes Metzler and Ludger Woessmann. 2012. The impact of teacher subject knowledge on student achievement: Evidence from within-teacher withinstudent variation. Journal of Development Economics 99, 2 (2012), 486--496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Briana B. Morrison, Lijun Ni, and Mark Guzdial. 2012. Adapting the disciplinary commons model for high school teachers: improving recruitment, creating community. In Proceedings of the ninth annual international conference on International computing education research. ACM, 47--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jennifer Nias. 1996. Thinking about feeling: The emotions in teaching. Cambridge journal of education 26, 3 (1996), 293--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Tanys Roscorla. 2015. 3 Policay Barriers Facing Computer Science Education. (2015). http://www.centerdigitaled.com/k-12/ 3-Policy-Barriers-Facing-Computer-Science-Education.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Peter Salovey and John D. Mayer. 1990. Emotional intelligence. Imagination, cognition and personality 9, 3 (1990), 185--211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Sue Sentance and Andrew Csizmadia. 2017. Computing in the curriculum: Challenges and strategies from a teacher's perspective. Education and Information Technologies (2017), 1--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Harvey Siy, Brian Dorn, Carol Engelmann, Neal Grandgenett, Tracie Reding, Jong-Hoon Youn, and Qiuming Zhu. 2017. SPARCS: A Personalized Problembased Learning Approach for Developing Successful Computer Science Learning Experiences in Middle School. In EIT'17: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1994. Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research 17 (1994), 273--285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. The Telegraph. 2016. University Degree Subjects with the Highest Dropout Rates. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Michele M. Tugade and Barbara L. Fredrickson. 2004. Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of personality and social psychology 86, 2 (2004), 320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Harold Wenglinsky. 2001. Teacher classroom practices and student performance: How schools can make a difference. ETS Research Report Series 2001, 2 (2001). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. N. Yamani, M. Shahabi, and F. Haghani. 2014. The relationship between emotional intelligence and job stress in the faculty of medicine in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism 2, 1 (Jan 2014), 20--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Baiyin Yang. 2003. Toward a Holistic Theory of Knowledge and Adult Learning. Human Resource Development Review 2, 2 (2003), 106--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Understanding the "Teacher Experience" in Primary and Secondary CS Professional Development

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ICER '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
        August 2017
        316 pages
        ISBN:9781450349680
        DOI:10.1145/3105726

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 August 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ICER '17 Paper Acceptance Rate29of180submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        ICER 2024
        ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
        August 13 - 15, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader