skip to main content
10.1145/3106426.3106524acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Optimization of financial network stability by genetic algorithm

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Directed network with flow dynamics is an important topic in realistic complex systems such as banking systems. We study the stability of these financial networks using a homogeneous and a more general inhomogeneous model. The nodes of the networks are banks and they are under four different kinds of disturbance that may lead to bankruptcy, which is defined by the condition that the capital value of the bank is below a critical value, such as zero. The stability of this network is measured by the minimum value of capital of the nodes after a fixed time of money flow in the network. The smaller the minimum value, the higher the probability of the first bankruptcy. By means of genetic algorithm with networks as the chromosome, the edges between nodes as genes, we can perform evolutionary computation using rewiring of edges as the genetic operators to search for a network topology with high stability. Our analytical results on flow dynamics are based on the linear relation between net change and PageRank centrality under small damping factor. Our numerical analysis shows that genetic algorithm can be very efficient in finding network with given connectivity that is stable against four categories of disturbance, namely under internal (and external) perturbation that is cumulative or noncumulative. Our results show that a banking network with each bank with similar relative wealth (thus small Gini coefficient in wealth distribution) is more stable than one with highly unequal wealth distribution. We also find our optimization method works for delaying the second bankruptcy after the first. These results may be useful in practical applications for the prevention of the first failure, as well as cascade failures in real complex systems.

References

  1. Réka Albert, Hawoong Jeong, and Albert-László Barabási. 2000. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. nature 406, 6794 (2000), 378--382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Brin and L. Page. 1998. The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine. In Seventh International World-Wide Web Conference (WWW 1998). http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/361/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Weiran Cai, Li Chen, Fakhteh Ghanbarnejad, and Peter Grassberger. 2015. Avalanche outbreaks emerging in cooperative contagions. Nature physics 11, 11 (2015), 936--940.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kenneth L Calvert, Matthew B Doar, and Ellen W Zegura. 1997. Modeling internet topology. IEEE Communications magazine 35, 6 (1997), 160--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Reuven Cohen, Keren Erez, Daniel Ben-Avraham, and Shlomo Havlin. 2000. Resilience of the internet to random breakdowns. Physical review letters 85, 21 (2000), 4626.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. L da F Costa, Francisco A Rodrigues, Gonzalo Travieso, and Paulino Ribeiro Villas Boas. 2007. Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements. Advances in physics 56, 1 (2007), 167--242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Riley Crane and Didier Sornette. 2008. Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 41 (2008), 15649--15653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Mario Eboli. 2013. Financial Applications of Flow Network Theory. In Advanced Dynamic Modeling of Economic and Social Systems. Springer, 21--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mario Eboli. 2013. A flow network analysis of direct balance-sheet contagion in financial networks. Technical Report. Kiel working paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mario Eboli. 2015. Simulations of Financial Contagion in Interbank Networks: Some Methodological Issues. In Propagation Phenomena in Real World Networks. Springer, 311--327.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Larry Eisenberg and Thomas H Noe. 2001. Systemic risk in financial systems. Management Science 47, 2 (2001), 236--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Zachary Feinstein. 2015. It's a Trap: Emperor Palpatine's Poison Pill. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.09054 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Paul François. 2014. Evolving phenotypic networks in silico. In Seminars in cell & developmental biology, Vol. 35. Elsevier, 90--97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ya-Chun Gao, Yong Zeng, and Shi-Min Cai. 2015. Influence network in the Chinese stock market. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2015, 3 (2015), P03017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Corrado Gini. 1912. Variabilità e mutabilità. Reprinted in Memorie di metodologica statistica (Ed. Pizetti E, Salvemini, T). Rome: Libreria Eredi Virgilio Veschi (1912). {16} C Gini. 1997. Concentration and dependency ratios. Rivista di politica economica 87 (1997), 769--792.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. James P Gleeson, TR Hurd, Sergey Melnik, and Adam Hackett. 2012. Systemic risk in banking networks without Monte Carlo simulation. In Advances in Network Analysis and its Applications. Springer, 27--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wenshuo Guo and Kwok Yip Szeto. 2017. Minimization of Systemic Risk for Directed Network Using Genetic Algorithm. In European Conference on the Applications of Evolutionary Computation. Springer, 3--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Andrew G Haldane and Robert M May. 2011. Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature 469, 7330 (2011), 351--355.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Okyu Kwon and J-S Yang. 2008. Information flow between stock indices. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 82, 6 (2008), 68003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Patrick Wan-Hin Luk, Ga Ching Lui, and Kwok Yip Szeto. 2016. Optimization of systemic stability of directed network using genetic algorithm. In Computer and Information Science (ICIS), 2016 IEEE/ACIS 15th International Conference on. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosario N Mantegna. 1999. Hierarchical structure in financial markets. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 11,1 (1999), 193--197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Melanie Mitchell. 1998. An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Marcel Rieser and Kai Nagel. 2008. Network breakdown "at the edge of chaos" in multi-agent traffic simulations. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 63, 3 (2008), 321--327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Mikail Rubinov and Olaf Sporns. 2010. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 52, 3 (2010), 1059--1069.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. John Scott. 2012. Social network analysis. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Amartya Sen. 1997. On Economic Inequality. Oxford University Press. http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxp:obooks:9780198292975Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Didier Sornette, Fabrice Deschâtres, Thomas Gilbert, and Yann Ageon. 2004. Endogenous versus exogenous shocks in complex networks: An empirical test using book sale rankings. Physical Review Letters 93, 22 (2004), 228701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Kwok Yip Szeto and Jian Zhang. 2005. Adaptive genetic algorithm and quasi-parallel genetic algorithm: Application to knapsack problem. In International Conference on Large-Scale Scientific Computing. Springer, 189--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Degang Wu and Kwok Yip Szeto. 2014. Applications of genetic algorithm on optimal sequence for Parrondo games. In 6th ECTA 2014-Proceedings of the International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Theory and Applications, Part of the 6th International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence, IJCCI 2014, Rome, Italy. 30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Optimization of financial network stability by genetic algorithm

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                WI '17: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence
                August 2017
                1284 pages
                ISBN:9781450349512
                DOI:10.1145/3106426

                Copyright © 2017 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 23 August 2017

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                WI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate118of178submissions,66%Overall Acceptance Rate118of178submissions,66%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader