skip to main content
10.1145/3109859.3109901acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Recommendation of High Quality Representative Reviews in e-commerce

Published:27 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many users of e-commerce portals commonly use customer reviews for making purchase decisions. But a product may have tens or hundreds of diverse reviews leading to information overload on the customer. The main objective of our work is to develop a recommendation system to recommend a subset of reviews that have high content score and good coverage over different aspects of the product along with their associated sentiments. We address the challenge which arises due to the fact that similar aspects are mentioned in different reviews using different natural language expressions. We use vector representations to identify mentions of similar aspects and map them with aspects mentioned in product features specifications. Review helpfulness score may act as a proxy for the quality of reviews, but new reviews do not have any helpfulness score. We address the cold start problem by using a dynamic convolutional neural network to estimate the quality score from review content. The system is evaluated on datasets from Amazon and Flipkart and is found to be more effective than the competing methods.

References

  1. Li Chen, Guanliang Chen, and Feng Wang. 2015. Recommender systems based on user reviews: the state of the art. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 25, 2 (2015), 99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Kavita Ganesan, ChengXiang Zhai, and Jiawei Han. 2010. Opinosis: a graph-based approach to abstractive summarization of highly redundant opinions. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 340--348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kavita Ganesan, ChengXiang Zhai, and Evelyne Viegas. 2012. Micropinion generation: an unsupervised approach to generating ultra-concise summaries of opinions. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 869--878. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Shima Gerani, Yashar Mehdad, Giuseppe Carenini, Raymond T. Ng, and Bita Nejat. 2014. Abstractive Summarization of Product Reviews Using Discourse Structure. In EMNLP. 1602--1613.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Anindya Ghose and Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis. 2007. Designing novel review ranking systems: predicting the usefulness and impact of reviews. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Electronic commerce. ACM, 303--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Minqing Hu and Bing Liu. 2004. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 168--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Nal Kalchbrenner, Edward Grefenstette, and Phil Blunsom. 2014. A convolutional neural network for modelling sentences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.2188 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Soo-Min Kim, Patrick Pantel, Tim Chklovski, and Marco Pennacchiotti. 2006. Automatically assessing review helpfulness. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 423--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Theodoros Lappas, Mark Crovella, and Evimaria Terzi. 2012. Selecting a characteristic set of reviews. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 832--840. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Theodoros Lappas and Dimitrios Gunopulos. 2010. Efficient confident search in large review corpora. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 195--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Julian McAuley and Jure Leskovec. 2013. Hidden factors and hidden topics: understanding rating dimensions with review text. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 165--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Julian McAuley, Rahul Pandey, and Jure Leskovec. 2015. Inferring networks of substitutable and complementary products. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 785--794. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Julian McAuley, Christopher Targett, Qinfeng Shi, and Anton Van Den Hengel. 2015. Image-based recommendations on styles and substitutes. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Xinfan Meng and Houfeng Wang. 2009. Mining user reviews: from specification to summarization. In Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers. Association for Computational Linguistics, 177--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Thanh-Son Nguyen, Hady W. Lauw, and Panayiotis Tsaparas. 2015. Review synthesis for micro-review summarization. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 169--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Guang Qiu, Bing Liu, Jiajun Bu, and Chun Chen. 2011. Opinion word expansion and target extraction through double propagation. Computational linguistics 37, 1 (2011), 9--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kazutaka Shimada, Ryosuke Tadano, and Tsutomu Endo. 2011. Multi-aspects review summarization with objective information. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 27 (2011), 140--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Panayiotis Tsaparas, Alexandros Ntoulas, and Evimaria Terzi. 2011. Selecting a comprehensive set of reviews. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 168--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Oren Tsur and Ari Rappoport. 2009. RevRank: A Fully Unsupervised Algorithm for Selecting the Most Helpful Book Reviews. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nana Xu, Hongyan Liu, Jiawei Chen, Jun He, and Xiaoyong Du. 2014. Selecting a representative set of diverse quality reviews automatically. In Proceedings of the 2014 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 488--496.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Zhu Zhang and Balaji Varadarajan. 2006. Utility scoring of product reviews. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 51--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Li Zhuang, Feng Jing, and Xiao-Yan Zhu. 2006. Movie review mining and summarization. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 43--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Recommendation of High Quality Representative Reviews in e-commerce

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          RecSys '17: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
          August 2017
          466 pages
          ISBN:9781450346528
          DOI:10.1145/3109859

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 August 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          RecSys '17 Paper Acceptance Rate26of125submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

          Upcoming Conference

          RecSys '24
          18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
          October 14 - 18, 2024
          Bari , Italy

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader