skip to main content
10.1145/3116595.3116612acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

A Framework Supporting Selecting Space to Make Place in Spatial Mixed Reality Play

Published:15 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Studies of mixed reality systems, especially games and play, have proliferated in the human-computer interaction literature, yet little research has directly addressed how designers select physical spaces to make places. A space is a physical area, while a place is a space infused with meaning. Mixed reality games that make use of physical space make and/or alter places. Selection of a space as a setting for a mixed reality play raises questions around immersion, safety, and user experience design. The present research analyzes the mixed reality literature through grounded theory to derive guidelines for selecting space and making place in mixed reality play. We consider 71 papers and 17 games after filtering over 240 papers for how they address space. We contribute a framing for mixed reality spaces on two axes: one that reflects space continuity and one that reflects space specificity requirements. From the framework, we provide design implications for space selection.

References

  1. John A. Agnew and David N. Livingstone. 2011. The SAGE Handbook of Geographical Knowledge. SAGE Publications Ltd., London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ronald T. Azuma. 1999. The Challenge of Making Augmented Reality Work Outdoors. In Mixed Reality: Merging Real and Virtual. Springer-Verlag, 379--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Rafael Ballagas, Andre Kuntze, and Steffen P. Walz. 2008. Gaming Tourism: Lessons from Evaluating REXplorer, a Pervasive Game for Tourists. In Proceedings of Pervasive Computing (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Jadwiga Indulska, Donald J. Patterson, Tom Rodden, and Max Ott (Eds.), Vol. 5013. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 244--261. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--540--79576--6_15Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Steve Benford and Gabriella Giannachi. 2011. Performing Mixed Reality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Walter Benjamin. 1969. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In Illuminations, Hannah Arendt (Ed.). Schocken Books, New York, New York, USA. Translated by Harry Zohn from the 1935 essay.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. David Birchfield, Harvey Thornburg, M. Colleen Megowan-Romanowicz, Sarah Hatton, Brandon Mechtley, Igor Dolgov, and Winslow Burleson. 2008. Embodiment, multimodality, and composition: Convergent themes across HCI and education for mixed-reality learning environments. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2008 (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Brett Bligh and Charles Crook. 2017. Learning Spaces. In Technology Enhanced Learning, Erik Duval, Mike Sharples, and Rosamund Sutherland (Eds.). Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 69--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Elizabeth M. Bonsignore, Derek L. Hansen, Phoebe O. Toups Dugas, Lennart E. Nacke, Anastasia Salter, and Wayne Lutters. 2012. Mixed Reality Games. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7--8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2141512.2141517 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gaetano Borriello, Matthew Chalmers, Anthony LaMarca, and Paddy Nixon. 2005. Delivering Real-world Ubiquitous Location Systems. Commun. ACM 48, 3 (March 2005), 36--41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1047671.1047701 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Roger Caillois. 1961. Man, Play and Games. University of IL Press, Urbana, IL, USA. Translated by Meyer Barash from the 1958 Les jeux et les hommes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Paul M. Camic. 2010. From trashed to treasured: A grounded theory analysis of the found object. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 4, 2 (2010), 81--92. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018429 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Marcus Carter, John Downs, Bjorn Nansen, Mitchell Harrop, and Martin Gibbs. 2014. Paradigms of Games Research in HCI: A Review of 10 Years of Research at CHI. In Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27--36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2658537.2658708 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Matthew Chalmers and Areti Galani. 2004. Seamful Interweaving: Heterogeneity in the Theory and Design of Interactive Systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 243--252. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013149 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Juliet M. Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13, 1 (1990), 3--21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Chris Crawford. 1984. The Art of Computer Game Design. Osborne/McGraw-Hill, Berkeley, California, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining "Gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (MindTrek '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9--15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Paul Dourish. 2001. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction (1st ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Paul Dourish. 2006. Re-space-ing Place: "Place" and "Space" Ten Years on. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 299--308. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1180875.1180921 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Michael Epstein and Silvia Vergani. 2006. History Unwired: Mobile Narrative in Historic Cities. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 302--305. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1133265.1133327 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hauke Ernst and Martin Faust. 2002. DERIVE: A Distributed Platform for Mixed Reality Interaction. In CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 570--571. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/506443.506488 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jason Farman. 2013. Mobile interface theory: Embodied space and locative media. Routledge, New York, New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Steven Feiner, Blair MacIntyre, Tobias Hollerer, and Anthony Webster. 1997. A Touring Machine: Prototyping 3D mobile augmented reality systems for exploring the urban environment. In ISWC '97: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE Computer Society, 74--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Dedre Gentner and Albert L. Stevens. 1983. Mental Models. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. James J. Gibson. 2014. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (classic ed.). Psychology Press, New York, New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Barney G. Glaser. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. The Sociology Press, Mill Valley, California, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Barney G. Glaser. 1998. Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. The Sociology Press, Mill Valley, California, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Barney G. Glaser and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, IL, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kilem Li Gwet. 2014. Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters (4th ed.). Advanced Analytics, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Steve Harrison and Paul Dourish. 1996. Re-place-ing Space: The Roles of Place and Space in Collaborative Systems. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '96). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 67--76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/240080.240193 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jeffrey Hightower and Gaetano Borriello. 2001. Location Systems for Ubiquitous Computing. Computer 34, 8 (2001), 57--66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.940014 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Rashina Hoda, James Noble, and Stuart Marshall. 2011. Grounded Theory for Geeks. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 24:1--24:17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2578903.2579162 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Nathan Hook. 2015. Grounded Theory. In Game Research Methods, Petri Lankoski and Staffan Bjork (Eds.). ETC Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 309--320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Johan Huizinga. 1955. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture (translated from the 1944 German ed.). Beacon Press, Boston, MA, USA. Translator unknown.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. David H. Jonassen and Philip Henning. 1996. Mental models: Knowledge in the head and knowledge in the world. In ICLS '96: Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Learning Sciences. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 433--438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Paula Levine. 2003. Shadows from another place: Transposed space. Media in Transition 4 (2003), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Lucy R. Lippard. 1971. Marcel Duchamp. In Dadas on Art: Tzara, Arp, Duchamp, and Others, Lucy R. Lippard (Ed.). Dover Publications, Inc., 139--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Wei Liu, Adrian David Cheok, Charissa Lim Mei-Ling, and Yin-Leng Theng. 2007. Mixed Reality Classroom: Learning from Entertainment. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts (DIMEA '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 65--72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1306813.1306833 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Mark A. Livingston, Joseph L. Gabbard, J. Edward Swan II, Ciara M. Sibley, and Jane H. Barrow. 2013. Basic perception in head-worn augmented reality displays. In Human Factors in Augmented Reality Environments, Weidong Huang, Leila Alem, and Mark A. Livingston (Eds.). Springer, New York, New York, USA, 35--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Sus Lundgren, Joel E. fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Olof Torgersson. 2015. Designing Mobile Experiences for Collocated Interaction. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 496--507. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675171 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Blair MacIntyre, Jay David Bolter, and Maribeth Gandy. 2004. Presence and the aura of meaningful places. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 2 (2004), 197--206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Paul Milgram and Fumio Kishino. 1994. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Information Systems E77-D, 12 (1994), 1321--1329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Markus Montola. 2005. Exploring the edge of the magic circle: Defining pervasive games. In Proceedings of Digital Arts and Culture.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. M. Nakevska, Jun Hu, G. Langereis, and M. Rauterberg. 2012. Alice's adventures in an immersive mixed reality environment. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 303--304. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2012.6402585 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Susanna Nilsson, Mattias Arvola, Anders Szczepanski, and Magnus Bng. 2012. Exploring Place and Direction: Mobile Augmented Reality in the Astrid Lindgren Landscape. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (OzCHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 411--419. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2414536.2414601 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Don Norman. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition (2013 ed.). Basic Books, New York, New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Remo Pillat, Arjun Nagendran, and Robb Lindgren. 2012. A Mixed Reality System for Teaching STEM Content Using Embodied Learning and Whole-body Metaphors. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry (VRCAI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 295--302. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2407516.2407584 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Helge Renkewitz, Verena Kinder, Mario Brandt, and Thomas Alexander. 2008. Optimal font size for head-mounted-displays in outdoor applications. In 2008 12th International Conference Information Visualisation. IEEE, 503--508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Katie Salen and Eric Zimmerman. 2004a. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, Chapter Defining Games, 70--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Katie Salen and Eric Zimmerman. 2004b. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, Chapter The Magic Circle, 92--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Martijn J. Schuemie, Peter van der Straaten, Merel Krijn, and Charles A. P. G. van der Mast. 2001. Research on Presence in VR: A Survey. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 4, 2 (April 2001), 183--201. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Hitesh Nidhi Sharma, Phoebe O. Toups Dugas, Igor Dolgov, Andruid Kerne, and Ajit Jain. 2016. Evaluating Display Modalities Using a Mixed Reality Game. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 65--77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968090 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Bruce Thomas, Ben Close, John Donoghue, John Squires, Phillip De Bondi, Michael Morris, and Wayne Piekarski. 2000. ARQuake: An outdoor/indoor augmented reality first person application. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC'00). 139--146. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2000.888480 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Bruce H. Thomas and Wayne Piekarski. 2003. Outdoor Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Information and Communication Technologies (ISICT '03). Trinity College Dublin, 226--231. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=963600.963645Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Marjaana Traskbaack and Michael Haller. 2004. Mixed Reality Training Application for an Oil Refinery: User Requirements. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry (VRCAI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 324--327. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1044588.1044658 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Yi-Fu Tuan. 1975. Place: An Experiential Perspective. Geographical Review 65, 2 (1975), 151--165. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/213970 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Yi-Fu Tuan. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Dimitrios Tzovaras, Konstantinos Moustakas, Georgios Nikolakis, and Michael G. Strintzis. 2009. Interactive Mixed Reality White Cane Simulation for the Training of the Blind and the Visually Impaired. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 13, 1 (Jan. 2009), 51--58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-007-0171--2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Friedrich von Borries, Steffen P. Walz, and Matthias Bottger. 2007. Space Time Play: Computer Games, Architecture and Urbanism: The Next Level. Birkhauser Architecture, Basel, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Changqing Zhou, Pamela Ludford, Dan Frankowski, and Loren Terveen. 2005. An Experiment in Discovering Personally Meaningful Places from Location Data. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2029--2032. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1057084 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Jean-Marie Zogg. 2007. Essentials of Satellite Navigation - Compendium. Technical Report GPS-X-02007-C. u-blox AG.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Framework Supporting Selecting Space to Make Place in Spatial Mixed Reality Play

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI PLAY '17: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
      October 2017
      590 pages
      ISBN:9781450348980
      DOI:10.1145/3116595

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 October 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI PLAY '17 Paper Acceptance Rate46of178submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate421of1,386submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader