skip to main content
10.1145/3116595.3116634acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Is My Dog "Playing" Tablet Games?: Exploring Human Perceptions of Dog-Tablet Interactions

Published:15 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Playful interaction of pets with tablets is a spreading phenomenon. Thousands of videos of people giving tablets to their pets to "play" can be found online, and training schools are offering classes teaching tablet skills for dogs. While the nature of pets "playing" with tablets is yet to be fully understood, some works highlight the potential dangers of such interactions. Humans -- both pet owners and pet professionals, play a pivotal role in shaping the way pets interact with technology, both in terms of promoting pet-oriented technologies, as well as posing requirements for them. This paper presents an exploratory study of human perceptions and attitudes towards playful interactions of dogs with tablets. Our results reveal mixed feelings towards this phenomenon, and awareness of the potential dangers of such interactions. Moreover, roughly half of the participants do not consider such interactions as "play", leading to further questions concerning the motivations of pet owners for exposing their pets to technology and the future of mobile apps for pet play.

References

  1. Sofya Baskin, Sharon Anavi-Goffer, and Anna Zamansky. 2015. Serious Games: Is Your User Playing or Hunting?. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing. Springer, 475--481. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sofya Baskin and Anna Zamansky. 2015. The player is chewing the tablet!: Towards a systematic analysis of user behavior in animal-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 463--468. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sofya Baskin, Anna Zamansky, and Vitaliya Kononova. 2016. Exploring human perceptions of dog-tablet playful interactions. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. ACM, 15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Marc Bekoff, Colin Allen, and Gordon M Burghardt. 2002. The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gordon M Burghardt. 2005. The genesis of animal play: Testing the limits. Mit Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Marcus Carter, Sarah Webber, and Sally Sherwen. 2015. Naturalism and ACI: augmenting zoo enclosures with digital technology. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. ACM, 61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Adrian David Cheok, Roger Thomas Kok Chuen Tan, Roshan Lalintha Peiris, Owen Noel Newton Fernando, James Teh Keng Soon, Imiyage Janaka Prasad Wijesena, and Janyn Yin Ping Sen. 2011. Metazoa Ludens: Mixed-reality interaction and play for small pets and humans. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 41, 5 (2011), 876--891. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jacob Cohen. 1977. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (revised ed.). (1977).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. CPG Driessen, K Alfrink, M Copier, and H Lagerweij. 2014. What could playing with pigs do to us? Game design as multispecies philosophy. Antennae: The Journal of Nature in Visual Culture 30 (2014), 81--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tamás Faragó, Attila Andics, Viktor Devecseri, Anna Kis, Márta Gácsi, and Ádám Miklósi. 2014. Humans rely on the same rules to assess emotional valence and intensity in conspecific and dog vocalizations. Biology letters 10, 1 (2014), 20130926.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Annika Geurtsen, Maarten H Lamers, and Marcel JM Schaaf. 2015. Interactive digital gameplay can lower stress hormone levels in home alone dogs case for animal welfare informatics. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing. Springer, 238--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas and Janet C Read. 2016. Using behavioural information to help owners gather requirements from their dogs' responses to media technology. In Proceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference: Fusion! BCS Learning & Development Ltd., 42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Philip N Lehner. 1998. Handbook of ethological methods. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Clara Mancini. 2011. Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto. interactions 18, 4 (2011), 69--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Demi Mankoff, Anind Dey, Jennifer Mankoff, and Ken Mankoff. 2005. Supporting interspecies social awareness: using peripheral displays for distributed pack awareness. In Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 253--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Adám Miklósi. 2014. Dog behaviour, evolution, and cognition. OUP Oxford. Is My Dog "Playing" Tablet Games? CHI PLAY '17, October 15--18, 2017, Amsterdam, NetherlandsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Conor Murphy. 2013. Chew on This: Analyzing 200 Dogs & Cats Playing with iPads. (2013). http://www.bigfishgames.com/blog/chew-on-this-analyzing-200-dogs-cats-playing-with-ipads/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Padgadget. 2014. iPad Classes for Dogs. (2014). http://www.padgadget.com/2014/03/21/idog-clinics-use-ipad-to-teach-dogs-to-read/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Patricia Pons, Javier Jaen, and Alejandro Catala. 2015. Envisioning future playful interactive environments for animals. In More Playful User Interfaces. Springer, 121--150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Patricia Pons, Javier Jaen, and Alejandro Catala. 2015. Envisioning future playful interactive environments for animals. In More Playful User Interfaces. Springer, 121--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Team Register. 2013. iPad classes for DOGS offered in New York. (2013). http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/08/28/ipad_classes_for_dogs_offered_in_new_york/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sarah Webber, Marcus Carter, Sally Sherwen, Wally Smith, Zaher Joukhadar, and Frank Vetere. 2017. Kinecting with Orangutans: Zoo Visitors' Empathetic Responses to Animals? Use of Interactive Technology. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6075--6088. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sarah Webber, Marcus Carter, Wally Smith, and Frank Vetere. 2017. Interactive technology and human--animal encounters at the zoo. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 98 (2017), 150--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Michelle Westerlaken and Stefano Gualeni. 2014. Felino: The philosophical practice of making an interspecies videogame. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Michelle Westerlaken and Stefano Gualeni. 2016. Becoming with: Towards the inclusion of animals as participants in design processes. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. ACM, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Chadwick A Wingrave, Jeremy Rose, Todd Langston, and Joseph J LaViola Jr. 2010. Early explorations of CAT: canine amusement and training. In CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2661--2670.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hanna Wirman. 2014. Games for/with strangers-Captive orangutan (pongo pygmaeus) touch screen play. Antennae (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanna Wirman, Willie Smits, Gino Yu, and Wilson Yuen. 2011. Defeated by an orangutan? Approaching cross-species gameplay. In DiGRA 2011 Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanna Wirman and Anna Zamansky. 2016. Toward characterization of playful ACI. interactions 23, 4 (2016), 47--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanna E Wirman and Ida KH Jørgensen. 2015. Designing for intuitive use for non-human users. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. ACM, 58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Is My Dog "Playing" Tablet Games?: Exploring Human Perceptions of Dog-Tablet Interactions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI PLAY '17: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
      October 2017
      590 pages
      ISBN:9781450348980
      DOI:10.1145/3116595

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 October 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI PLAY '17 Paper Acceptance Rate46of178submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate421of1,386submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader