skip to main content
10.1145/3119881.3119883acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Visual complexity of chinese ink paintings

Published: 16 September 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Complexity is a key factor influencing aesthetic judgment of artworks. Using a well-known artist Wu Guanzhong's paintings as examples, we provide quantified methods to gauge three visual attributes which influence the complexity of paintings, i.e. color richness, stroke thickness and white space. By conducting regression analysis, our research validates the influences of given visual attributes on perceived complexity, and distinguishes the complexity measurements for abstract paintings and representational paintings. Specifically, all three factors influence the complexity of abstract paintings; In contrast, mere white space influences that of representational paintings.

References

[1]
Daniel E. Berlyne. 1970. Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics 8, 5 (Jan 1970), 279-286.
[2]
George D. Birkhoff. 1933. Aesthetic measure. Harvard university press.
[3]
Yung K. Chan and Chih Y. Chen. 2004. Image retrieval system based on color-complexity and color-spatial features. Journal of Systems and Softwar e 71, 1 (April 2004), 65-70.
[4]
Razvan G. Condorovici, Corneliu Florea and Constantin Vertan. 2013. Painting Scene Recognition Using Homogenous Shapes. Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems 8192, 262-273.
[5]
Don C. Donderi. 2006. Visual complexity: a review. Psychological Bulletin 132, 1 (Feb. 2006), 73-97.
[6]
Zhen B. Fan, Zhang, and Xian. J. S. Zheng. 2017. Evaluation and analysis of white space in Wu Guanzhong's Chinese paintings. Leonardo (online Feb. 2017), MIT Press.
[7]
Raphael A. Finkel and J. L. Bentley. 1974. Quad trees a data structure for retrieval on composite keys. Acta informatica 4, 1 (Mar. 1984), 1-9.
[8]
Ann M. Fiore. 2010. Understanding aesthetics for the merchandising and design professional. Bloomsbury Acad & Prof.
[9]
Alexandra Forsythe. Visual complexity: is that all there is? In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (HCII), Vol. 5639, 158-166.
[10]
Frith, C. D., and Nias, D. K. 1974. What determines aesthetic preferences? Journal of General Psychology 91, 2, 163-173.
[11]
Ernst H. Gombrich. 1980. The Sense of Order. London: Phaidon.
[12]
Xiaoying Guo, Takio Kurita, Chie M. Asano, and Akira Asano. 2013. Visual complexity assessment of painting images. In Proceedings of the 20th. IEEE International Conference on Image Processin g (ICIP'13), 388-392.
[13]
Simon Harper, Caroline Jay, Eleni Michailidou and Huangmao Quan. 2013. Analysing the visual complexity of web pages using document structure. Behaviour and Information Technology 32, 5 (May 2013), 491-502.
[14]
Jean Serra. 1982. Image analysis and mathematical morphology. Academic Press, Orlando, USA.
[15]
Hideaki Kawabata and Semir Zeki. 2004. Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of Neurophysiology 91, 4 (May 2004), 1699-1705. .
[16]
Ruth Kimchi. 2015. The perception of hierarchical structure. Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organization, (Aug. 2015).
[17]
Helmut Leder, Benno Belke, Andries Oeberst. and Dorothee Augustin. 2004. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology 95, 4 (Nov. 2014), 489--508.
[18]
Petra G. Lengger, Florian Ph.S. Fischmeister, Helmut Leder and Herbert Bauer. 2007. Functional neuroanatomy of the perception of modern art: A DC-EEG study on the influence of stylistic information on aesthetic experience. Brain Research 1158, 1 (Aug. 2007), 93-102.
[19]
Hongzhe Liu, Ye Liang and Guangmei Xu 2012. Research on quantifying color of HSV in extraction of middle-level semantic objects of traditional Chinese painting images. In Proceedings of the 2rd. International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology, 15-19.
[20]
Petros Marago. 2005. Morphological filtering for image enhancement and feature detection. Handbook of Image and Video Processing, 135-156.
[21]
David Navon. 1977. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 9, 3 (July 1977), 353-383.
[22]
Stephen E. Palmer. 1977. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology 9, 4 (Oct. 1977), 441-474.
[23]
Jukka Perkiö and Aapo Hyvärinen. 2009. Modelling image complexity by independent component analysis, with application to content-based image retrieval. Artificial Neural Networks, Limassol, Cyprus, 704-714.
[24]
Rik Pieters, Michel Wedel and Rajeev Batra. 2013. The stopping power of advertising: measures and effects of visual complexity. Journal of Marketing 74, 5 (Sept. 2010), 48-60.
[25]
Sophia Psarra and Tadeusz Grajewski. 2001. Describing shape and shape complexity using local properties. In Proceedings of the 3<sup>rd</sup>. International Space Syntax Symposium, Vol. 28, 1-16.
[26]
Helen C. Purchase, Euan Freeman and John Hamer. 2012. Predicting Visual Complexity. In Proceedings of the 3<sup>rd</sup> International Conference on Appearance, 62-65.
[27]
Rolf Reber, Norbert Schwarz and Piotr Winkielman. 2004. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review 8, Article 4 (Feb. 2004), 364-384.
[28]
Slobodan Marković. 2011. Perceptual, semantic and affective dimensions of experience of abstract and representational paintings. Psihologija 44, 3, 191-210.
[29]
John R. Smith and Shih F. Chang. 1995. Single color extraction and image query. In Proceedings on the International Conference on Image Processing 3, 3528.
[30]
Joan G. Snodgrass and Mary Vanderwart. 1980. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory 6, 2, 174-215.
[31]
Ching H. Su, Hunag S. Chiu and Tsai M. Hsiehb. 2011. An efficient image retrieval based on HSV color space. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering, 5746-5749.
[32]
Shamik Sural, Gang Qian and Sakti Pramanik. 2002. Segmentation and histogram generation using the HSV color space for image retrieval. International Conference on Image Processing, Vol. 2. 589~592.
[33]
Wladyslaw Tatarkiewicz. 1970-1974. History of Aesthetics.
[34]
Christian Wallraven, Roland Fleming, Douglas Cunningham, Jaume Rigau, Miquel Feixas and Mateu Sbert. 2009. Categorizing art: Comparing humans and computers. Computers & Graphics 33, 4 (Aug. 2009), 484-495.
[35]
Gunter Wyszecki and W. S. Stiles. 1967. Color science: concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulas. American Journal of Psychology 18, 10: 353.
[36]
Songhua Xu, Yingqing Xu, Sing B. Kang, David H. Salesin, Yunhe Pan and Heung Y. Shum. 2006. Animating Chinese paintings through stroke-based decomposition. Transactions on Graphic s 25, 2 (April 2006), 239-267.
[37]
Jia J. Zhang, Jinhui Yu, Kang Zhan, Xianjun S. Zheng, and Junsong Zhang. 2017. Computational aesthetic evaluation of logos, ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 14, 3 (June 2017).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Comparative Study of Early and Late Painting Styles in Zhang Daqian’s Lotus WorksIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.340441512(73676-73690)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Computational Approaches for Traditional Chinese Painting: From the “Six Principles of Painting” PerspectiveJournal of Computer Science and Technology10.1007/s11390-024-3408-x39:2(269-285)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
  • (2022)IC9600: A Benchmark Dataset for Automatic Image Complexity AssessmentIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3232328(1-17)Online publication date: 2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Visual complexity of chinese ink paintings

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAP '17: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception
    September 2017
    101 pages
    ISBN:9781450351485
    DOI:10.1145/3119881
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 September 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. chinese paintings
    2. complexity
    3. regression model
    4. visual perception

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • National NSFC project
    • National High-tech R&D Program

    Conference

    SAP '17
    Sponsor:
    SAP '17: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2017
    September 16 - 17, 2017
    Cottbus, Germany

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 43 of 94 submissions, 46%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Comparative Study of Early and Late Painting Styles in Zhang Daqian’s Lotus WorksIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.340441512(73676-73690)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)Computational Approaches for Traditional Chinese Painting: From the “Six Principles of Painting” PerspectiveJournal of Computer Science and Technology10.1007/s11390-024-3408-x39:2(269-285)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
    • (2022)IC9600: A Benchmark Dataset for Automatic Image Complexity AssessmentIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3232328(1-17)Online publication date: 2022
    • (2022)The Doctrine of the Mean: Chinese Calligraphy with Moderate Visual Complexity Elicits High Aesthetic PreferenceInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2022.214486440:6(1355-1368)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Research on the visual image-based complexity perception method of autonomous navigation scenes for unmanned surface vehiclesScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-022-14355-y12:1Online publication date: 20-Jun-2022
    • (2022)A comparative study of oil paintings and Chinese ink paintings on compositionThe Visual Computer10.1007/s00371-022-02408-2Online publication date: 19-Feb-2022
    • (2021)Towards AI Aesthetics: Human-AI Collaboration in Creating Chinese Landscape PaintingCulture and Computing. Interactive Cultural Heritage and Arts10.1007/978-3-030-77411-0_15(213-224)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2021
    • (2021)Classification of Chinese and Western Painting Images Based on Brushstrokes FeatureEntertainment Computing – ICEC 202010.1007/978-3-030-65736-9_30(325-337)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2021
    • (2020)Visual order of Chinese ink paintingsVisual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art10.1186/s42492-020-00059-53:1Online publication date: 12-Oct-2020
    • (2020)Research on the Perception of Calligraphy Time Sequence Based on Markov ChainProceedings of the 2nd World Symposium on Software Engineering10.1145/3425329.3425342(66-71)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media