skip to main content
10.1145/3121113.3121228acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

To bracket or not bracket: experiments in gamification in the wilds of technical communication

Published:11 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

"Gamification" research has evolved and grown dramatically in recent years, gaining popularity across disciplines. While such efforts have generated headway in many respects, and in various directions, from conceptual understandings to user studies, the field could benefit from more work focused upon use in research methodologies at the nexus of practice and theory. This paper, in turn, reflects upon such an experiment aimed at the design and application of gamification techniques within a typical technical-communication context. In this case, subject matter experts within the National Park Service were being asked to improve accessibility of their site brochures by audio describing them. During this training, they were given an overview of audio description, as a process, as well as introduced to a prototype web tool and then asked to use that tool to create the description for their site brochure. Unlike previous training exercises with other parks in this project, though, this group also was organized by sites into a tournament bracket, in which pairs of parks competed against each other in exercises designed to create comparable audio description. The winner of each round, as determined by an independent panel of judges, advanced to the next round, spurred by the promise of fun Hawaiian-themed prizes at the end. This gamification strategy appeared to generate more data, and more research-focused data, than the previous training exercises we have offered, per user. It also apparently engaged many, in various evident ways. But it also seemed to disenfranchise some as well, who dropped out of this voluntary training, creating a mix of results, which will be outlined in this paper.

References

  1. Bogost, I. (2016). Play Anything: The Pleasure of Limits, the Uses of Boredom, and the Secret of Games. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Deterding, S. (2014). Eudaimonic design, or: Six invitations to rethink gamification. In M. Fuchs, S. Fizek, P. Ruffino, & N. Schrape (Eds.), Rethinking Gamification (pp. 305--331). Luneburg, Germany: Meson Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Deterding, S., Björk, S. L., Nacke, L. E., Dixon, D., & Lawley, E. (2013). Designing gamification: creating gameful and playful experiences. Paper presented at the CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. deWinter, J., & Vie, S. (2016). Games in Technical Communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(3), 151--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. London: Penguin Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Nacke, L. E., & Deterding, S. (2017). The maturing of gamification research. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 450--454. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Rauch, M. (2013). Best practices for using enterprise gamification to engage employees and customers. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Las Vegas, NV. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Walz, S. P., & Deterding, S. (2015). The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGDOC '17: Proceedings of the 35th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication
    August 2017
    286 pages
    ISBN:9781450351607
    DOI:10.1145/3121113

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 11 August 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGDOC '17 Paper Acceptance Rate61of77submissions,79%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader