skip to main content
10.1145/3121113.3121239acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Leveraging UX research method shifts to uncover guiding user metaphors

Published:11 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The research paper describes mixed-methods Experience Design research instruments that investigate the relationship between cross-cultural identity and location. Qualitative research instruments were designed to initially locate connections between conceptions of the self and symbolic pathways, and then to push out from conceptual paths to find boundaries and key connections between them. This paper details qualitative research into how an African university deploys place-based identity through its website, and how university students navigate through the university portal to desired information. This research uncovered whether the structure of a website reinforced audience notions of place through their use of metaphor, image, and navigation cues. The paper outlines the creation of the research instrument, discusses how early data collection guided later data collection, and finally details how these methods solicit users to define the significance of the data during research method shifts.

References

  1. Dutta, U., and Das, S. 2015. The digital divide at the margins: Co-designing information solutions to address the needs of indigenous populations of rural India. Communication Design Quarterly. 4, 1 (2015), 36--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Getto, G. 2015. What technical communicators and UX designers can learn from participatory action research. Whitepaper Retrieved from http://guiseppegetto.com/2015/11/04/what-technical-communicators-and-ux-designers-can-learn-from-participatory-action-research/>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hayes, G. R. 2011. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions of Computer-Human Interaction. 18, 3, Article 15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lakoff, G, and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lewin, K. 1951. Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartocci, G. Mara, A., & Potts, L. G. 2013. The ethics of agile ethnography. Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference ond Design of communication. ACM, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. McTaggart, R. 1996. Issues for participatory action researchers. In New Directions in Action Research. Falmer Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Norman, D. 2002. The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Portigal, S. 2013. Interviewing users: How to uncover compelling insights. Brooklyn: Rosenfeld.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Rose, E.J. & Walton, R. 2015. Factors to actors: Implications of posthumanism for social justice work. Proceedings of the 33rd ACM international conference on The design of communication. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Salvo, M. 2001. Ethics of engagement: User-centered design and rhetorical methodology. Technical Communication Quarterly. 10, 3, (2001), 273--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Scott, B., Longo, B., & Willis, K. 2007. Critical power tools: Technical communication and cultural studies. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. St. Amant, K. 2017. Of scripts and prototypes: A two-part approach to user experience design for international contexts. Technical Communication. 64, 2, (2017), 113--125Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tomkins, S. S. 1987. Script theory. In J. Arno, A. I. Rabin, & R.A. Zucker (Eds.), The emergence of personality (pp. 147--216). New York: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tomkins, S. S. 1978. Script theory: Differential magnification of affects. Nebraska symposium on motivation, 26, 201--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Leveraging UX research method shifts to uncover guiding user metaphors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGDOC '17: Proceedings of the 35th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication
      August 2017
      286 pages
      ISBN:9781450351607
      DOI:10.1145/3121113

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 August 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGDOC '17 Paper Acceptance Rate61of77submissions,79%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader