skip to main content
10.1145/3122986.3122994acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Guiding Driver Visual Attention with LEDs

Published:24 September 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Previous research has shown that drivers benefit from directional warnings in early warning situations. To be effective, early warnings must support the driver to easily identify potential hazards. We investigated LEDs at the bottom of the windshield to guide the driver's visual attention to target stimuli to support an artificial visual discrimination task. We varied the patterns of LED illumination. The patterns included either the illumination of single LEDs or sequentially illuminated LEDs generating the illusion of movement towards the target LED. Additionally, we compared flashing against constant illumination of the target LEDs. The results showed that participants reacted 200-450 ms faster and produced up to 4 times fewer errors to sequential patterns. Flashing the target LED segment led to slower reactions with more errors than constant illumination. We showed that drivers' attention can be directed efficiently and effectively with simple hardware and well-designed illumination patterns.

References

  1. Arduino. 2012. "An Open-Source Electronics Prototyping Platform" http://www.arduino.ccGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Thomas Booth, Srinivas Sridharan, Ann McNamara, Cindy Grimm, Reynold Bailey. 2013. Guiding attention in controlled real-world environments. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, 75--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Timothy L. Brown, John D. Lee, Daniel V. McGehee. 2001. Human performance models and rear-end collision avoidance algorithms. Human Factors 43,3: 462--482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Thomas A. Dingus, Feng Guo, Suzie Lee, Jonathan F. Antin, Miguel Perez, Mindy Buchanan-King, Jonathan Hankey. 2016. Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving. PNAS 113, 10: 2636--2641.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mica R. Endsley. 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human factors, 37, 1: 32--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sheila G. Klauer, Thomas A. Dingus, Vicki L. Neale, Jeremy D. Sudweeks, & D. J. Ramsey. 2006. The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: An analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. DOT HS 810 594.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Henrik Lind. 2007. An efficient visual forward collision warning display for vehicles. Tech. Report No. 2007-01-1105. SAE International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lutz M. Lorenz, Thomas Lindberg, Klaus Bengler. 2014. Neuartige Warnstrategien zur Ausrichtung der Aufmerksamkeit bei Kollisionsgefahr. In 9. Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme: FAS 2014. Darmstadt: Uni-DAS e.V.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Andreas Löcken et al. 2017. Towards Adaptive Ambient In-Vehicle Displays and Interactions: Insights and Design Guidelines from the 2015 AutomotiveUI Dedicated Workshop. In Automotive User Interfaces, 325--348.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Elke Muhrer, Mark Vollrath. 2010. Expectations while car following - the consequences for driving behavior in a simulated driving task. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42: 2158--2164Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hermann J. Müller, Patrick M. Rabbitt. 1989. Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 15, 2: 315--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Frederik Naujoks, Alexandra Neukum. 2014. Specificity and timing of advisory warnings based on cooperative perception. In Mensch & Computer 2014-Workshopband, 229--238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Miguel A. Perez, Raymond J. Kiefer, Alice Haskins, Jonathan M. Hankey. 2009. Evaluation of Forward Collision Warning System Visual Alert Candidates and SAE J2400. SAE Report 09B-0394.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Laura Pomarjanschi, Michael Dorr, Peter J. Bex, Erhardt Barth. 2013. Simple gaze-contingent cues guide eye movements in a realistic driving simulator. In Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XVIII, 865110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Michael I. Posner. 1980. Orienting of attention. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 32,1: 3--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lena Rittger, Thomas Stemmler. 2017. LED-Displays für Fahrerassistenzsysteme. Retrieved April 24th, 2017 from http://publikationen.dglr.de/?tx_dglrpublications_pi1% 5bdocument_id%5d=010004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Christoph Rommerskirchen, Magnus Helmbrecht, Klaus Bengler. 2013. Increasing complexity of driving situations and its impact on an ADAS for anticipatory assistance for the reduction of fuel consumption. In Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2013 IEEE, 573--578.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gerald Schmidt, Hans-Peter Krüger. 2010. Violating the driver's threat anticipation and the effect of different modalities for Forward Collision Warnings (FCW). In Proceedings of HFES Europe Chapter Conference 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerald Schmidt. 2012. The influence of anticipation and warnings on collision avoidance behavior of attentive drivers. Ph.D. dissertation. Julius-Maximilans-Universität Würzburg. Retrieved April 24th, 2017 from https://opus.bibliothek.uni-wuerzburg.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/6282Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. N. Schweitzer, Y. Apter, G. Ben-David, D. G. Liebermann, A. Parush. 1995. A field study on braking responses during driving, II. Minimum driver braking times. Ergonomics, 38: 1903--1910Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Charles Spence, John McDonald, Jon Driver. 2004. Exogenous spatial cuing studies of human crossmodal attention and multisensory integration. In Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention, 277--320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Elizabeth Styles. 2006. The psychology of attention. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jan Theeuwes, Marjan P. Hagenzieker. 1993. Visual search of traffic scenes: On the effect of location expectations. Vision in Vehicles, 4: 149--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Steven P. Tipper, Jon Driver, and Bruce Weaver. 1991. Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43, 2: 289--298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Trent Victor, Marco Dozza, Jonas Bärgman, Christian-Nils Boda, Johan Engström, Carol Flannagan, John D. Lee, Gustav Markkula. 2015. Analysis of naturalistic driving study data: SAFER glances, driver inattention, and crash risk. No. SHRP 2 Report S2-S08A-RW-1. Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Rami Zarife, Gerald Schmidt, Andrea Kiesel. Integration früher Kollisionswarnungen im urbanen Kontext. 2014. Welche Warnhinweise kann der Fahrer effektiv nutzen? In 30. VDI/VW Gemeinschaftstagung Fahrerassistenz und Integrierte Sicherheit, 65--74, Wolfsburg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Guiding Driver Visual Attention with LEDs

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            AutomotiveUI '17: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
            September 2017
            317 pages
            ISBN:9781450351508
            DOI:10.1145/3122986

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 24 September 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            AutomotiveUI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate29of85submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

            Upcoming Conference

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader