skip to main content
10.1145/3123024.3124396acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Solving the wrong problem: when technology is making us blind

Published:11 September 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

While sensors allow researchers to measure more and more aspects of our life, applying this technology to real world environments is challenging. This paper reviews an already published study about the deployment of psychophysiological sensors in a stroke unit. The study exemplifies the difficulties to understand users' requirements first. By focusing on the technical challenges of measuring stress levels, researchers may neglect the real requirements of nurses and clinicians. During the study, it was found that the stroke unit staff were not interested in their stress levels but wanted to identify stressors that they can mitigate. This case study shows how, aside from technical challenges, researchers have to fully understand the complex nature of requirements in the context where the technology is applied.

References

  1. G. Cacioppo, J. T.; Tassinary, L. G. & Berntson (ed.). 2007. Handbook of Psychophysiology. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Martin Kusserow, Oliver Amft, and Gerhard Troster. 2013. Monitoring Stress Arousal in the Wild. IEEE Pervasive Computing 12, 2: 28--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lars Müller, Monica Divitini, Simone Mora, Verónica Rivera-Pelayo, and Wilhelm Stork. 2007. Context Becomes Content?: Sensor Data for Computer Supported Reflective Learning. 6, 1: 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lars Müller, Veronica Rivera-Pelayo, Christine Kunzmann, and Andreas Schmidt. 2011. From stress awareness to coping strategies of medical staff: Supporting reflection on physiological data. In 2nd International Workshop on Human Behavior Unterstanding, HBU 2011, 93--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lars Müller, Mark Sonnentag, and Stephan Heuer. 2013. Supporting reflection on dementia care using proximity sensors. In Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) 2013, 89--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Donald A. Norman and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2015. DesignX: Complex Sociotechnical Systems. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 1, 2: 83--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ming-Zher Poh, Nicholas C Swenson, and Rosalind W Picard. 2010. A wearable sensor for unobtrusive, long-term assessment of electrodermal activity. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 57, 5: 1243--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. The Health and Safety Executive. Statistics 2009/10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 2011. Movisens - ECG- and activity sensor. Retrieved from http://www.movisens.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 2011. Polar - listen to your body. Retrieved from http://www.polar.fiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Solving the wrong problem: when technology is making us blind

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
      September 2017
      1089 pages
      ISBN:9781450351904
      DOI:10.1145/3123024

      Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 September 2017

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader