skip to main content
10.1145/3123024.3125504acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

In-classroom self-tracking for teachers and students: preliminary findings from a pilot study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 September 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Self-tracking technologies are nowadays commonly used in areas like fitness or personal health. Their use in the work environment is however still under-explored. Employers do have an interest in utilizing technology to quantify different work-related factors, e.g., the use of office space, the interactions among employees, or the collective mood at work. We however advocate for a stronger focus on empowering individuals to self-track their own activities, emotions and performance at work, to reflect on the collected data and possibly use it to drive behavioral changes. In this paper, we focus in particular on empowering two specific categories of workers: teachers and students. We describe a pilot study that we ran at our institution to understand which data and data gathering tools can be used to monitor teachers' and students' emotions and engagement during lectures. We define an empirical metric, called the Emotional Shift, to assess the impact of a lecture on students emotional state. Using the data collected during our pilot study, we show how this metric can be used in practice. Finally, we discuss the limitations of our current approach and provide an outlook on our future work.

References

  1. Daniel Enthoven. 2013. Quantified Self? How About a Quantified Workplace? http://tinyurl.com/y7qvskb4. (May 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Arroyo et al. Emotion Sensors Go To School. In AIED. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bosch et al. Automatic detection of learning-centered affective states in the wild. In IUI 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cantrell et al. 2013a. Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching: Culminating Findings from the MET Project's Three-Year Study. MET Project Research Paper (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hinton et al. 2008. Brain Research, Learning and Emotions: Implications for Education Research, Policy and Practice. European Journal of education (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Klassen et al. 2013b. Measuring Teacher Engagement: Development of the Engaged Teachers Scale (ETS). Frontline Learning Research (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Maroco et al. 2016a. University Student's Engagement: Development of the University Student Engagement Inventory (USEI). Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Pollak et al. PAM: A Photographic Affect Meter for Frequent, In Situ Measurement of Affect. In CHI 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Palumbo et al. 2017. Interpersonal Autonomic Physiology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ruiz et al. 2016b. Supporting learning by considering emotions: tracking and visualization a case study. In LAK 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sano et al. Recognizing Academic Performance, Sleep Quality, Stress Level, and Mental Health Using Personality Traits, Wearable Sensors and Mobile Phones. In BSN 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Triglianos et al. Inferring student attention with ASQ. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang et al. StudentLife: Assessing Mental Health, Academic Performance and Behavioral Trends of College Students Using Smartphones. In UbiComp 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Whitehill et al. 2014. The Faces of Engagement: Automatic Recognition of Student Engagement from Facial Expressions. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang et al. 2015. Physiological Measurement on Students' Engagement in a Distributed Learning Environment. In PhyCS 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. In-classroom self-tracking for teachers and students: preliminary findings from a pilot study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
      September 2017
      1089 pages
      ISBN:9781450351904
      DOI:10.1145/3123024

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 September 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader