skip to main content
10.1145/3125433.3125462acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesopencollabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Does Miner Pooling Impact Bitcoin's Ability to Stay Decentralized?

Published:23 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Emerging Blockchain technologies have earned substantial attention in the area of Financial Technology in recent years. Its decentralized environment allows for the mining of Bitcoins by miners either independently or in groups. The community of miners have faith in the integrity of each other to sustain the network, through mining pools remaining at a reasonable level of mining power. Blockchain's decentralized system is one of its main selling points and is a source of great attraction for users. However, when these mining pools start to grow and increase their mining power to dangerous levels it can result in a shift towards a centralized environment. This push goes against foundational principles of Bitcoin, leading to ongoing debate among various stakeholders.

References

  1. Hashrate Distribution. Blockchain.info, 2017. https://blockchain.info/pools?timespan=24hours.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. CryptoCurrency Market Capitalizations. Coinmarketcap.com, 2016. https://coinmarketcap.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bamert, T., Decker, C., Elsen, L., Wattenhofer, R. and Welten, S. Have a Snack, Pay with Bitcoins. International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing, (2013), (pp. 1--5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, S., Boyen, X., Shi, E. and Uzun, E. Bitter to Better --- How to Make Bitcoin a Better Currency. International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, (2012), (pp. 399--414).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dion, D. I'll Gladly Trade You Two Bits On Tuesday For a Byte Today: Bitcoin, Regulating Fraud In The Economy of Hacker-Cash. University of Illinois Journal of Technology and Policy, (2013), (pp. 165--201).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Eyal, I. The Miner's Dilemma. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, (2015), (pp. 89--103). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Eyal, I. and Gun Sirer, E. Bitcoin is Broken. Hacking Distributed, (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fabian, B., Ermakova, T. and Sander, U. Anonymity in Bitcoin - The Users' Perspective. International Conference on Information Systems, (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Goel, S. Blockchain: The next big thing in technology?. The Economic Times, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson, B., Laszka, A., Grossklags, J., Vasek, M. and Moore, T. Game-Theoretic Analysis of DDoS Attacks Against Bitcoin Mining Pools. International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, (2014), (pp. 72--86).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Peters, G. and Panayi, E. Understanding Modern Banking Ledgers through Blockchain Technologies: Future of Transaction Processing and Smart Contracts on the Internet of Money. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Walsh, C., O'Reilly, P., Gleasure, R., Feller, J., Li, S. and Cristiforo, J. New kid on the block: A strategic archetypes approach to understanding the Blockchain. International Conference on Information Systems, (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. deMeijer, C. The UK and Blockchain technology: A balanced approach. Journal of Payments and Strategy, (2015), (pp. 220--229).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Litecoin Miners Urged to Leave Coinotron Pool Over 51% Threat. CoinDesk, 2014. http://www.coindesk.com/litecoin-miners-urged-leave-coinotron-51-threat/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Krypton Recovers from a New Type of 51% Network Attack - Crypto Hustle. Crypto Hustle, 2016. https://cryptohustle.com/krypton-recovers-from-a-new-type-of-51-network-attack.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dowd, K. and Hutchinson, M. Bitcoin Will Bite the Dust. Cato Journal, (2015), (pp. 357--382).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    OpenSym '17: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration
    August 2017
    218 pages
    ISBN:9781450351874
    DOI:10.1145/3125433

    Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 August 2017

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate108of195submissions,55%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader