skip to main content
10.1145/3125649.3125651acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiteConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Identifying Grey Sheep Users By The Distribution of User Similarities In Collaborative Filtering

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recommender Systems have been successfully applied to alleviate the information overload problem and assist the process of decision making. Collaborative filtering, as one of the most popular recommendation algorithms, has been fully explored and developed in the past two decades. However, one of the challenges in collaborative filtering, the problem of "Grey Sheep" user, is still under investigation. "Grey Sheep" users is a group of the users who have special tastes and they may neither agree nor disagree with the majority of the users. The identification of them becomes a challenge in collaborative filtering, since they may introduce difficulties to produce accurate collaborative recommendations. In this paper, we propose a novel approach which can identify the Grey Sheep users by reusing the outlier detection techniques based on the distribution of user-user similarities. Our experimental results based on the MovieLens 10M rating data demonstrate the ease and effectiveness of our proposed approach.

References

  1. Gediminas Adomavicius, Bamshad Mobasher, Francesco Ricci, and Alexander Tuzhilin 2011. Context-Aware Recommender Systems. AI Magazine, Vol. 32, 3 (2011), 67--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Markus M. Breunig, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Raymond T. Ng, and Jörg Sander 2000. LOF: identifying density-based local outliers. In ACM sigmod record, Vol. 29. ACM, 93--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Robin Burke. 2002. Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments. User modeling and user-adapted interaction Vol. 12, 4 (2002), 331--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Varun Chandola, Arindam Banerjee, and Vipin Kumar. 2009. Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM computing surveys (CSUR) Vol. 41, 3 (2009), 15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Mark Claypool, Anuja Gokhale, Tim Miranda, Pavel Murnikov, Dmitry Netes, and Matthew Sartin. 1999. Combining content-based and collaborative filters in an online newspaper Proceedings of ACM SIGIR workshop on recommender systems, Vol. Vol. 60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mustansar Ghazanfar and Adam Prugel-Bennett 2011. Fulfilling the Needs of Gray-Sheep Users in Recommender Systems, A Clustering Solution Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Information Systems and Computational Intelligence. 18--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mustansar Ali Ghazanfar and Adam Prügel-Bennett 2014. Leveraging clustering approaches to solve the gray-sheep users problem in recommender systems. Expert Systems with Applications Vol. 41, 7 (2014), 3261--3275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Benjamin Gras, Armelle Brun, and Anne Boyer 2016. Identifying Grey Sheep Users in Collaborative Filtering: a Distribution-Based Technique Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, 17--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Victoria Hodge and Jim Austin 2004. A survey of outlier detection methodologies. Artificial intelligence review Vol. 22, 2 (2004), 85--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. John McCrae, Anton Piatek, and Adam Langley. 2004. Collaborative filtering. http://www.imperialviolet.org (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Paul Resnick, Neophytos Iacovou, Mitesh Suchak, Peter Bergstrom, and John Riedl 1994. GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 175--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Manuela Ruiz-Montiel and José Aldana-Montes 2009. Semantically enhanced recommender systems. In On the move to meaningful internet systems: OTM 2009 workshops. Springer, 604--609. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Xiaoyuan Su and Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar 2009. A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Advances in artificial intelligence Vol. 2009 (2009), 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Zheng, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke 2014. CSLIM: Contextual SLIM Recommendation Algorithms Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 301--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Yong Zheng, Bamshad Mobasher, and Robin Burke. 2015. Similarity-Based Context-aware Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 431--447. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Identifying Grey Sheep Users By The Distribution of User Similarities In Collaborative Filtering

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      RIIT '17: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Research in Information Technology
      October 2017
      48 pages
      ISBN:9781450351201
      DOI:10.1145/3125649

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      RIIT '17 Paper Acceptance Rate6of11submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate51of116submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader