skip to main content
10.1145/3126594.3126648acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Crowd Research: Open and Scalable University Laboratories

Published:20 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research experiences today are limited to a privileged few at select universities. Providing open access to research experiences would enable global upward mobility and increased diversity in the scientific workforce. How can we coordinate a crowd of diverse volunteers on open-ended research? How could a PI have enough visibility into each person's contributions to recommend them for further study? We present Crowd Research, a crowdsourcing technique that coordinates open-ended research through an iterative cycle of open contribution, synchronous collaboration, and peer assessment. To aid upward mobility and recognize contributions in publications, we introduce a decentralized credit system: participants allocate credits to each other, which a graph centrality algorithm translates into a collectively-created author order. Over 1,500 people from 62 countries have participated, 74% from institutions with low access to research. Over two years and three projects, this crowd has produced articles at top-tier Computer Science venues, and participants have gone on to leading graduate programs.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. 2017. The Times Higher Education World University Rankings. (2017). https://www.timeshighereducation. com/world-university-rankingsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ricardo A Baeza-Yates, Carlos Castillo, Vicente López, Martin Shubik, John Hopcroft, and Daniel Sheldon. 2007. Pagerank Increase under Different Collusion Topologies. In AIRWeb, Vol. 5. Springer, Sage Publications, 68--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Julie A Bianchini. 2011. Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America's science and technology talent at the crossroads. National Academies Press, Washington, District of Columbia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Rick Bonney, Heidi Ballard, Rebecca Jordan, Ellen McCallie, Tina Phillips, Jennifer Shirk, and Candie C Wilderman. 2009. Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. William G Bowen and Derek Bok. 2016. The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nama Budhathoki. 2016. Who are the mappers and why do they map in OpenStreetMap. (2016). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvakiUOsDrMGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yan Chen, Steve Oney, and Walter S Lasecki. 2016. Towards providing on-demand expert support for software developers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3192--3203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. CIA. 2016. The world factbook. (2016). https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349, 6251 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Seth Cooper, firas Khatib, Adrien Treuille, Janos Barbero, Jeehyung Lee, Michael Beenen, Andrew Leaver-Fay, David Baker, Zoran Popovi´c, and Foldit players. 2010. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature 466, 7307 (2010), 756--760.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Joe Cox, Eun Young Oh, Brooke Simmons, Chris Lintott, Karen Masters, Anita Greenhill, Gary Graham, and Kate Holmes. 2015. Defining and measuring success in online citizen science: A case study of Zooniverse projects. Computing in Science & Engineering 17, 4 (2015), 28--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Catherine Durnell Cramton and Pamela J Hinds. 2004. Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Research in organizational behavior 26 (2004), 231--263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Justin Cranshaw and Aniket Kittur. 2011. The polymath project: lessons from a successful online collaboration in mathematics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1865--1874. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ruth Cronje, Spencer Rohlinger, Alycia Crall, and Greg Newman. 2011. Does Participation in Citizen Science Improve Scientific Literacy? A Study to Compare Assessment Methods. Applied Environmental Education & Communication 10, 3 (7 2011), 135--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tawanna R Dillahunt, Bingxin Chen, and Stephanie Teasley. 2014. Model thinking: demographics and performance of MOOC students unable to afford a formal education. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference. ACM, 145--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Tawanna R Dillahunt, Sandy Ng, Michelle fiesta, and Zengguang Wang. 2016. Do Massive Open Online Course Platforms Support Employability?. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 232--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ying Ding, Erjia Yan, Arthur Frazho, and James Caverlee. 2009. PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, 11 (11 2009), 2229--2243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Steven Dow, Anand Kulkarni, Scott Klemmer, and Björn Hartmann. 2012. Shepherding the crowd yields better work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 1013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M Kevin Eagan, Sylvia Hurtado, Mitchell J Chang, Gina A Garcia, Felisha A Herrera, Juan C Garibay, and Juan C. Garibay. 2013. Making a Difference in Science Education: The Impact of Undergraduate Research Programs. American Educational Research Journal 50, 4 (8 2013), 683--713.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Snehalkumar (Neil) Gaikwad, Durim Morina, Rohit Nistala, Megha Agarwal, Alison Cossette, Radhika Bhanu, Saiph Savage, Vishwajeet Narwal, Karan Rajpal, Jeff Regino, Aditi Mithal, Adam Ginzberg, Aditi Nath, Karolina R. Ziulkoski, Trygve Cossette, Dilrukshi Gamage, Angela Richmond-Fuller, Ryo Suzuki, Jeerel Herrejón, Kevin Le, Claudia flores-Saviaga, Haritha Thilakarathne, Kajal Gupta, William Dai, Ankita Sastry, Shirish Goyal, Thejan Rajapakshe, Niki Abolhassani, Angela Xie, Abigail Reyes, Surabhi Ingle, Verónica Jaramillo, Martin Godinez, Walter Angel, Carlos Toxtli, Juan flores, Asmita Gupta, Vineet Sethia, Diana Padilla, Kristy Milland, Kristiono Setyadi, Nuwan Wajirasena, Muthitha Batagoda, Rolando Cruz, James Damon, Divya Nekkanti, Tejas Sarma, Mohamed Saleh, Gabriela Gongora-Svartzman, Soroosh Bateni, Gema Toledo Barrera, Alex Pena, Ryan Compton, Deen Aariff, Luis Palacios, Manuela Paula Ritter, Nisha K.K., Alan Kay, Jana Uhrmeister, Srivalli Nistala, Milad Esfahani, Elsa Bakiu, Christopher Diemert, Luca Matsumoto, Manik Singh, Krupa Patel, Ranjay Krishna, Geza Kovacs, Rajan Vaish, and Michael Bernstein. 2015. Daemo: A Self-Governed Crowdsourcing Marketplace. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. ACM, 101--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Snehalkumar (Neil) S. Gaikwad, Mark E. Whiting, Dilrukshi Gamage, Catherine A. Mullings, Dinesh Majeti, Shirish Goyal, Aaron Gilbee, Nalin Chhibber, Adam Ginzberg, Angela Richmond-Fuller, Sekandar Matin, Vibhor Sehgal, Tejas Seshadri Sarma, Ahmed Nasser, Alipta Ballav, Jeff Regino, Sharon Zhou, Kamila Mananova, Preethi Srinivas, Karolina Ziulkoski, Dinesh Dhakal, Alexander Stolzoff, Senadhipathige S. Niranga, Mohamed Hashim Salih, Akshansh Sinha, Rajan Vaish, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2017. The Daemo Crowdsourcing Marketplace. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S S Gaikwad, D Morina, A Ginzberg, C Mullings, S Goyal, D Gamage, C Diemert, M Burton, S Zhou, M Whiting, K Ziulkoski, A Ballav, A Gilbee, S S Niranga, V Sehgal, J Lin, L Kristianto, J Regino, N Chhibber, D Majeti, S Sharma, K Mananova, D Dhakal, W Dai, V Purynova, S Sandeep, V Chandrakanthan, T Sarma, S Matin, A Nassar, R Nistala, A Stolzoff, K Milland, V Mathur, R Vaish, and M S Bernstein. 2016. Boomerang: Rebounding the Consequences of Reputation Feedback on Crowdsourcing Platforms. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C R Gerstner and D V Day. 1997. Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 6 (1997), 827--844.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Eric Gilbert. 2013. Widespread underprovision on Reddit. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 803--808. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Timothy Gowers and Michael Nielsen. 2009. Massively collaborative mathematics. Nature 461, 7266 (2009), 879--881.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Patricia Gurin, Eric Dey, Sylvia Hurtado, and Gerald Gurin. 2002. Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review 72, 3 (2002), 330--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Russel S Hathaway, Biren A Nagda, and Sandra R Gregerman. 2002. The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: an empirical study. Journal of College Student Development 43, 5 (2002), 614.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Pamela J Hinds and Diane E Bailey. 2003. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization science 14, 6 (2003), 615--632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Pamela J Hinds and Mark Mortensen. 2005. Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization science 16, 3 (2005), 290--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Lu Hong and Scott E Page. 2004. Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101, 46 (2004), 16385--16389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Anne-Barrie Hunter, Sandra L. Laursen, and Elaine Seymour. 2007. Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education 91, 1 (1 2007), 36--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Lilly C Irani and M Silberman. 2013. Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 611--620. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Firas Khatib, Frank DiMaio, Seth Cooper, Maciej Kazmierczyk, Miroslaw Gilski, Szymon Krzywda, Helena Zabranska, Iva Pichova, James Thompson, Zoran Popović, Mariusz Jaskolski, and David Baker. 2011. Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 18, 10 (9 2011), 1175--1177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Sara Kiesler, Robert Kraut, Paul Resnick, and Aniket Kittur. 2012. Regulating behavior in online communities. Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Aniket Kittur, Jeffrey V. Nickerson, Michael Bernstein, Elizabeth Gerber, Aaron Shaw, John Zimmerman, Matt Lease, and John Horton. 2013. The future of crowd work. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 1301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Aniket Kittur, Boris Smus, Susheel Khamkar, and Robert E Kraut. 2011. Crowdforge: Crowdsourcing complex work. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. René F. Kizilcec and Sherif Halawa. 2015. Attrition and Achievement Gaps in Online Learning. In Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 57--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Jon M Kleinberg. 1999. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 46, 5 (1999), 604--632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Chinmay Kulkarni, Koh Pang Wei, Huy Le, Daniel Chia, Kathryn Papadopoulos, Justin Cheng, Daphne Koller, and Scott R Klemmer. 2013. Peer and self assessment in massive online classes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 6 (2013), 33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Chinmay E Kulkarni, Michael S Bernstein, and Scott R Klemmer. 2015. PeerStudio: rapid peer feedback emphasizes revision and improves performance. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. ACM, 75--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Karim R Lakhani, Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, and Michael Tushman. 2013. Open innovation and organizational boundaries: task decomposition, knowledge distribution and the locus of innovation. Handbook of economic organization: Integrating economic and organizational theory (2013), 355--382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Kate Land, Anže Slosar, Chris Lintott, Dan Andreescu, Steven Bamford, Phil Murray, Robert Nichol, M Jordan Raddick, Kevin Schawinski, Alex Szalay, Daniel Thomas, and Jan Vandenberg. 2008. Galaxy Zoo: the large-scale spin statistics of spiral galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 388, 4 (2008), 1686--1692.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. R. Eric Landrum and Lisa R. Nelsen. 2002. The Undergraduate Research Assistantship: An Analysis of the Benefits. Teaching of Psychology 29, 1 (2 2002), 15--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Adam Lashinsky. 2012. Inside Apple: How America's Most Admired--and Secretive--Company Really Works. John Murray Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Thomas D LaToza, W Ben Towne, Christian M Adriano, and André Van Der Hoek. 2014. Microtask programming: Building software with a crowd. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 43--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Edith Law, Andrea Wiggins, Mary L. Gray, and Alex Williams. 2017. Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Research: Implications of Uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Jeehyung Lee, Wipapat Kladwang, Minjae Lee, Daniel Cantu, Martin Azizyan, Hanjoo Kim, Alex Limpaecher, Snehal Gaikwad, Sungroh Yoon, Adrien Treuille, and others. 2014. RNA design rules from a massive open laboratory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 6 (2014), 2122--2127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Jin Li. 2003. US and Chinese cultural beliefs about learning. Journal of educational psychology 95, 2 (2003), 258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. David Lopatto. 2004. Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): first findings. Cell biology education 3, 4 (2004), 270--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Andrew Mao, Winter Mason, Siddharth Suri, Duncan J. Watts, and TW Malone. 2016. An Experimental Study of Team Size and Performance on a Complex Task. PLOS ONE 11, 4 (4 2016), e0153048.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. David Martin, Benjamin V. Hanrahan, Jacki O'Neill, and Neha Gupta. 2014. Being a turker. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 224--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Robert C Miller, Haoqi Zhang, Eric Gilbert, and Elizabeth Gerber. 2014. Pair research: matching people for collaboration, learning, and productivity. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 1043--1048. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Michael Nebeling, Alexandra To, Anhong Guo, Adrian A de Freitas, Jaime Teevan, Steven P Dow, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2016. WearWrite: Crowd-assisted writing from smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3834--3846. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Nigini Oliveira, Eunice Jun, and Katharina Reinecke. 2017. Citizen Science Opportunities in Volunteer-Based Online Experiments. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Lawrence Page, Sergey Brin, Rajeev Motwani, and Terry Winograd. 1999. The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Scott E Page. 2008. The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Vineet Pandey, Amnon Amir, Justine Debelius, Embriette R Hyde, Tomasz Kosciolek, Rob Knight, and Scott Klemmer. 2017. Gut Instinct: Creating scientific theories with online learners. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. David A Patterson. 1994. How to have a bad career in research/academia. In Keynote, 1994 USENIX Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. M Jordan Raddick, Georgia Bracey, Pamela L Gay, Chris J Lintott, Phil Murray, Kevin Schawinski, Alexander S Szalay, and Jan Vandenberg. 2009. Galaxy zoo: Exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. arXiv preprint arXiv:0909.2925 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Katharina Reinecke and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2015. LabintheWild: Conducting large-scale online experiments with uncompensated samples. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 1364--1378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Daniela Retelny, Sébastien Robaszkiewicz, Alexandra To, Walter S Lasecki, Jay Patel, Negar Rahmati, Tulsee Doshi, Melissa Valentine, and Michael S Bernstein. 2014. Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 75--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Olga Russakovsky, Li-Jia Li, and Li Fei-Fei. 2015. Best of both worlds: Human-machine collaboration for object annotation. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, 2121--2131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Susan H Russell, Mary P Hancock, and James McCullough. 2007. Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science 316, 5824 (2007), 548--549.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Heather Sarsons. 2015. Gender differences in recognition for group work. Working Paper, Harvard University (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Alok Shankar Mysore, Vikas S Yaligar, Imanol Arrieta Ibarra, Camelia Simoiu, Sharad Goel, Ramesh Arvind, Chiraag Sumanth, Arvind Srikantan, Bhargav HS, Mayank Pahadia, Tushar Dobha, Atif Ahmed, Mani Shankar, Himani Agarwal, Rajat Agarwal, Sai Anirudh-Kondaveeti, Shashank Arun-Gokhale, Aayush Attri, Arpita Chandra, Yogitha Chilukur, Sharath Dharmaji, Deepak Garg, Naman Gupta, Paras Gupta, Glincy Mary Jacob, Siddharth Jain, Shashank Joshi, Tarun Khajuria, Sameeksha Khillan, Sandeep Konam, Praveen Kumar-Kolla, Sahil Loomba, Rachit Madan, Akshansh Maharaja, Vidit Mathur, Bharat Munshi, Mohammed Nawazish, Venkata Neehar-Kurukunda, Venkat Nirmal-Gavarraju, Sonali Parashar, Harsh Parikh, Avinash Paritala, Amit Patil, Rahul Phatak, Mandar Pradhan, Abhilasha Ravichander, Krishna Sangeeth, Sreecharan Sankaranarayanan, Vibhor Sehgal, Ashrith Sheshan, Suprajha Shibiraj, Aditya Singh, Anjali Singh, Prashant Sinha, Pushkin Soni, Bipin Thomas, Kasyap Varma-Dattada, Sukanya Venkataraman, Pulkit Verma, and Ishan Yelurwar. 2015. Investigating the "Wisdom of Crowds" at Scale. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (UIST '15 Adjunct). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 75--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Hua-Wei Shen and Albert-László Barabási. 2014. Collective credit allocation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 34 (2014), 12325--12330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Jonathan Silvertown. 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24, 9 (9 2009), 467--471.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Günter K Stahl, Martha L Maznevski, Andreas Voigt, and Karsten Jonsen. 2010. Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. Journal of international business studies 41, 4 (2010), 690--709.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Matthias Stevens, Michalis Vitos, Julia Altenbuchner, Gillian Conquest, Jerome Lewis, and Muki Haklay. 2014. Taking participatory citizen science to extremes. IEEE Pervasive Computing 13, 2 (2014), 20--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Brian L. Sullivan, Christopher L. Wood, Marshall J. Iliff, Rick E. Bonney, Daniel fink, and Steve Kelling. 2009. eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation 142, 10 (10 2009), 2282--2292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Yizhou Sun, Yintao Yu, and Jiawei Han. 2009. Ranking-based clustering of heterogeneous information networks with star network schema. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 797--806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Ryo Suzuki, Niloufar Salehi, Michelle S Lam, Juan C Marroquin, and Michael S Bernstein. 2016. Atelier: Repurposing Expert Crowdsourcing Tasks as Micro-internships. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2645--2656. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Jaime Teevan, Shamsi T Iqbal, and Curtis von Veh. 2016. Supporting collaborative writing with microtasks. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2657--2668. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Ginka Toegel and Jay A Conger. 2003. 360-degree assessment: Time for reinvention. Academy of Management Learning & Education 2, 3 (2003), 297--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Bill Tomlinson, Joel Ross, Paul Andre, Eric Baumer, Donald Patterson, Joseph Corneli, Martin Mahaux, Syavash Nobarany, Marco Lazzari, Birgit Penzenstadler, and others. 2012. Massively distributed authorship of academic papers. In Extended Abstracts of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Jeanne L Tsai. 2007. Ideal affect: Cultural causes and behavioral consequences. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2, 3 (2007), 242--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Melissa A Valentine, Daniela Retelny, Alexandra To, Negar Rahmati, Tulsee Doshi, and Michael S Bernstein. 2017. flash Organizations: Crowdsourcing Complex Work by Structuring Crowds As Organizations. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3523--3537. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Andreas Veit, Michael J Wilber, Rajan Vaish, Serge J Belongie, James Davis, Vishal Anand, Anshu Aviral, Prithvijit Chakrabarty, Yash Chandak, Sidharth Chaturvedi, Chinmaya Devaraj, Ankit Dhall, Utkarsh Dwivedi, Sanket Gupte, Sharath N Sridhar, Karthik Paga, Anuj Pahuja, Aditya Raisinghani, Ayush Sharma, Shweta Sharma, Darpana Sinha, Nisarg Thakkar, K Bala Vignesh, Utkarsh Verma, Kanniganti Abhishek, Amod Agrawal, Arya Aishwarya, Aurgho Bhattacharjee, Sarveshwaran Dhanasekar, Venkata Karthik Gullapalli, Shuchita Gupta, Chandana G, Kinjal Jain, Simran Kapur, Meghana Kasula, Shashi Kumar, Parth Kundaliya, Utkarsh Mathur, Alankrit Mishra, Aayush Mudgal, Aditya Nadimpalli, Munakala Sree Nihit, Akanksha Periwal, Ayush Sagar, Ayush Shah, Vikas Sharma, Yashovardhan Sharma, Faizal Siddiqui, Virender Singh, Abhinav S., Pradyumna Tambwekar, Rashida Taskin, Ankit Tripathi, and Anurag D Yadav. 2015. On Optimizing Human-Machine Task Assignments. HCOMP 2015 Extended Abstracts (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Mark E Whiting, Dilrukshi Gamage, Snehalkumar (Neil) S Gaikwad, Aaron Gilbee, Shirish Goyal, Alipta Ballav, Dinesh Majeti, Nalin Chhibber, Angela Richmond-Fuller, Freddie Vargus, Tejas Seshadri Sarma, Varshine Chandrakanthan, Teogenes Moura, Mohamed Hashim Salih, Gabriel Bayomi Tinoco Kalejaiye, Adam Ginzberg, Catherine A Mullings, Yoni Dayan, Kristy Milland, Henrique Orefice, Jeff Regino, Sayna Parsi, Kunz Mainali, Vibhor Sehgal, Sekandar Matin, Akshansh Sinha, Rajan Vaish, and Michael S Bernstein. 2017. Crowd Guilds: Worker-led Reputation and Feedback on Crowdsourcing Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1902--1913. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Haizi Yu, Biplab Deka, Jerry O Talton, and Ranjitha Kumar. 2016. Accounting for taste: ranking curators and content in social networks. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2383--2389. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Lixiu Yu, Aniket Kittur, and Robert E Kraut. 2014. Distributed analogical idea generation: inventing with crowds. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1245--1254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Haoqi Zhang, Matthew W. Easterday, Elizabeth M. Gerber, Daniel Rees Lewis, and Leesha Maliakal. 2017. Agile Research Studios. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17. ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 220--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Andrew L. Zydney, Joan S. Bennett, Abdus Shahid, and Karen W. Bauer. 2002. Impact of Undergraduate Research Experience in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 91, April (4 2002), 151--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Crowd Research: Open and Scalable University Laboratories

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '17: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
      October 2017
      870 pages
      ISBN:9781450349819
      DOI:10.1145/3126594

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 October 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UIST '17 Paper Acceptance Rate73of324submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader