skip to main content
10.1145/3126858.3126884acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the Analysis of Users Engaged in Twitter's Trend Topics

Published:17 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online Social Networks (OSN) are virtual environments that allow users to exchange messages, interact, and share content. The amount of information flowing through OSN promotes the competition for attention and influence among users who struggle to co-opt other users to share their message. The influence gained by users can be important to call the attention to target topics so that they eventually become Trend Topics (most popular topics within a time frame). In this work, we illustrate how we can apply concepts of network science to analyze the network structure that represents a Trend Topic. As a consequence, we show how to identify important users that contributed significantly to the topic popularity. In addition, we show how we can detect naive artificial efforts, such as bot activities, to increase the popularity of a user and, consequently, the popularity of the topic.

References

  1. 1] Victoria P Aires, Paulo R Martins, and Fabiola G Nakamura. 2017. Construção e Análise das Redes Sociais de Personagens dos Filmes da Franquia O Senhor dos Anéis. VI Brazilian Workshop on Social Network Analysis and Mining (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Maria Teresinha Tamanini Andrade, Patricia Braga, Tereza Kelly Gomes Carneiro, Nubia Moura Ribeiro, Marcelo A Moret, and Hernane Borges de Barros Pereira. 2012. Análise Contextualizada de Redes Sociais: a colaboração em Comunidades Científicas. I Brazilian Workshop on Social Network Analysis and Mining (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mathieu Bastian, Sebastien Heymann, Mathieu Jacomy, and others. 2009. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. ICWSM 8 (2009), 361--362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Andrew Beveridge and Jie Shan. 2016. Network of thrones. Math Horizons 23, 4 (2016), 18--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Vincent D Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, and Etienne Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment 2008, 10 (2008), P10008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Meeyoung Cha, Hamed Haddadi, Fabricio Benevenuto, and P Krishna Gummadi. 2010. Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. Icwsm 10, 10--17 (2010), 30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Duanbing Chen, Linyuan Lü, Ming-Sheng Shang, Yi-Cheng Zhang, and Tao Zhou. 2012. Identifying influential nodes in complex networks. Physica a: Statistical mechanics and its applications 391, 4 (2012), 1777--1787.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Pranav Dandekar, Ashish Goel, and David T Lee. 2013. Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 15 (2013), 5791--5796. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Cinthya de M França, Antonio A de A Rocha, and Pedro B Velloso. 2014. Analyzing the Topological Structure of the eBay Negotiations' Network. In Proceedings of the 20th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web. ACM, 131--138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ralph Gross and Alessandro Acquisti. 2005. Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society. ACM, 71--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Akshay Java, Pranam Kolari, Tim Finin, and Tim Oates. 2006. Modeling the spread of influence on the blogosphere. In Proceedings of the 15th international world wide web conference. 22--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rong Lu and Qing Yang. 2012. Trend analysis of news topics on twitter. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing 2, 3 (2012), 327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Rayol M Neto, Bruno A Souza, Thais G Almeira, Fabíola G Nakamura, and Eduardo F Nakamura. 2017. Uma Abordagem para Identificação de Entidades Influentes em Eventos Comentados nas Redes Sociais Online. Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Colaborativos (SBSC) (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mark EJ Newman. 2006. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 103, 23 (2006), 8577--8582.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Adan Lucio Pereira and Ana Paula Appel. 2011. Modelagem do Armazenamento de Redes Complexas. In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web. VIII Workshop on Ongoing Undergraduate Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Eder JAL Pereira. 2015. Breve Contribuição das Redes Complexas para a Econofísica. IV Brazilian Workshop on Social Network Analysis and Mining (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Clara Pizzuti. 2008. Ga-net: A genetic algorithm for community detection in social networks. In International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature. Springer, 1081--1090. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Joshua Roesslein. 2015. tweepy Documentation. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Everett M Rogers. 2010. Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Britta Ruhnau. 2000. Eigenvector-centrality--a node-centrality? Social networks 22, 4 (2000), 357--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Guodong Shi and Karl Henrik Johansson. 2013. The role of persistent graphs in the agreement seeking of social networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 31, 9 (2013), 595--606. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Bruno Á Souza, Thais G Almeida, Alice AF Menezes, Fabíola G Nakamura, Carlos Figueiredo, and Eduardo F Nakamura. 2016. For or Against?: Polarity Analysis in Tweets about Impeachment Process of Brazil President. In Proceedings of the 22nd Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web. ACM, 335--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tang Tang and Roger Cooper. 2017. The Most Social Games: Predictors of Social Media Uses During the 2016 Rio Olympics. Communication & Sport (2017), 2167479516688438.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On the Analysis of Users Engaged in Twitter's Trend Topics

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WebMedia '17: Proceedings of the 23rd Brazillian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
          October 2017
          522 pages
          ISBN:9781450350969
          DOI:10.1145/3126858

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 17 October 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          WebMedia '17 Paper Acceptance Rate38of138submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate270of873submissions,31%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader