Abstract
Geometric modifications of three-dimensional (3D) digital models are commonplace for the purpose of efficient rendering or compact storage. Modifications imply visual distortions that are hard to measure numerically. They depend not only on the model itself but also on how the model is visualized. We hypothesize that the model’s light environment and the way it reflects incoming light strongly influences perceived quality. Hence, we conduct a perceptual study demonstrating that the same modifications can be masked, or conversely highlighted, by different light-matter interactions. Additionally, we propose a new metric that predicts the perceived distortion of 3D modifications for a known interaction. It operates in the space of 3D meshes with the object’s appearance, that is, the light emitted by its surface in any direction given a known incoming light. Despite its simplicity, this metric outperforms 3D mesh metrics and competes with sophisticated perceptual image-based metrics in terms of correlation to subjective measurements. Unlike image-based methods, it has the advantage of being computable prior to the costly rendering steps of image projection and rasterization of the scene for given camera parameters.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Supplemental movie and image files for, Visual Quality Assessment of 3D Models: On the Influence of Light-Material Interaction
- Tunç Ozan Aydin, Martin Čadík, Karol Myszkowski, and Hans-Peter Seidel. 2010. Video quality assessment for computer graphics applications. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 6 (Dec. 2010), 1.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Francesco Banterle, Patrick Ledda, Kurt Debattista, Marina Bloj, Alessandro Artusi, and Alan Chalmers. 2009. A psychophysical evaluation of inverse tone mapping techniques. Comput. Graph. Forum 28, 1 (2009), 13--25. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martin Čadík, Robert Herzog, Rafal Mantiuk, Radoslaw Mantiuk, Karol Myszkowski, and Hans-Peter Seidel. 2013. Learning to predict localized distortions in rendered images. Comput. Graph. Forum 32, 7 (2013), 401--410. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12248Google ScholarCross Ref
- Massimiliano Corsini, Elisa Drelie Gelasca, Touradj Ebrahimi, and Mauro Barni. 2007. Watermarked 3-D mesh quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 9, 2 (Feb. 2007), 247--256. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Massimiliano Corsini, Mohamed-Chaker Larabi, Guillaume Lavoué, Oldrich Petrík, Libor Vása, and Kai Wang. 2013. Perceptual metrics for static and dynamic triangle meshes. Comput. Graph. Forum 32, 1 (Feb. 2013), 101--125. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12001 Improved version of Eurographics State-of-the-Art Report.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott Daly. 1993. The visible differences predictor: An algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In Digital Images and Human Vision, Andrew B. Watson (Ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, 179--206.Google Scholar
- Jiří Filip, Michael J. Chantler, Patrick R. Green, and Michal Haindl. 2008. A psychophysically validated metric for bidirectional texture data reduction. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 5, Article 138 (Dec. 2008), 11 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1409060.1409091Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jirí Filip, Radomír Vávra, Michal Havlícek, and Mikulás Krupicka. 2017. Predicting visual perception of material structure in virtual environments. Comput. Graph. Forum 36, 1 (2017), 89--100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12789Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adria Fores, James Ferwerda, and Jinwei Gu. 2012. Toward a perceptually based metric for BRDF modeling. In Proceedings of the 20th Color and Imaging Conference. 142--148.Google Scholar
- F. Gao, D. Tao, X. Gao, and X. Li. 2015. Learning to rank for blind image quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Neur. Netw. Learn. Syst. 26, 10 (Oct. 2015), 2275--2290. 2162-237XDOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2014.2377181Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Garland and Paul S. Heckbert. 1998. Simplifying surfaces with color and texture using quadric error metrics. In Proceedings of the Conference on Visualization’98 (VIS’98). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 263--269. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jinjiang Guo, Vincent Vidal, Irene Cheng, Anup Basu, Atilla Baskurt, and Guillaume Lavoue. 2016. Subjective and objective visual quality assessment of textured 3D meshes. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 14, 2, Article 11 (Oct. 2016), 20 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2996296Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Guthe, Gero Müller, Martin Schneider, and Reinhard Klein. 2009. BTF-CIELab: A perceptual difference measure for quality assessment and compression of BTFs. Comput. Graph. Forum 28, 1 (Mar. 2009), 101--113. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert Herzog, Martin Čadík, Tunç O. Aydın, Kwawng In Kim, Karol Myszkowski, and Hans-Peter Seidel. 2012. NoRM: No-reference image quality metric for realistic image synthesis. Comput. Graph. Forum 31, 2 (2012), 545--554. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2012.03055.xGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Adrian Jarabo, Hongzhi Wu, Julie Dorsey, Holly Rushmeier, and Diego Gutierrez. 2014. Effects of approximate filtering on the appearance of bidirectional texture functions. IEEE Trans. Visualiz. Comput. Graph. XX, Xx (2014), 1--14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maurice G. Kendall and B. Babington Smith. 1940. On the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 31, 3/4 (1940), 324--345. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guillaume Lavoué. 2011. A multiscale metric for 3D mesh visual quality assessment. Comput. Graph. Forum 30, 5 (2011), 1427--1437.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guillaume Lavoué, Mohamed-Chaker Larabi, and Libor Vasa. 2016. On the efficiency of image metrics for evaluating the visual quality of 3D models. IEEE Trans. Visualiz. Comput. Graph. 22, 8 (Aug. 2016), 12.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patrick Ledda, Alan Chalmers, Tom Troscianko, and Helge Seetzen. 2005. Evaluation of tone mapping operators using a high dynamic range display. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 3 (Jul. 2005), 640. 07300301Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frédéric B. Leloup, Michael R. Pointer, Philip Dutré, and Peter Hanselaer. 2010. Geometry of illumination, luminance contrast, and gloss perception. Int. J. Occupat. Safety Ergonom. 27, 9 (2010), 2046--2054.Google Scholar
- Peter Lindstrom and Greg Turk. 2000. Image-driven simplification. ACM Trans. Graph. 19, 3 (Jul. 2000), 204--241. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/353981.353995Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yiming Liu, Jue Wang, Sunghyun Cho, Adam Finkelstein, and Szymon Rusinkiewicz. 2013. A no-reference metric for evaluating the quality of motion deblurring. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 6, Article 175 (Nov. 2013), 12 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2508363.2508391Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey Lubin. 1993. The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance. In Digital Images and Human Vision, A. B. Watson (Ed.). 163--178.Google Scholar
- Jeffrey Lubin. 1995. A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation. Vis. Models Target Detect. Recogn. 2 (1995), 245--357. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rafat Mantiuk, Kil Joong Kim, Allan G. Rempel, and Wolfgang Heidrich. 2011. HDR-VDP-2: A calibrated visual metric for visibility and quality predictions in all luminance conditions. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Papers (SIGGRAPH’11). ACM, New York, NY, Article 40, 14 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1964921.1964935Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rafał K. Mantiuk, Anna Tomaszewska, and Radosław Mantiuk. 2012. Comparison of four subjective methods for image quality assessment. Comput. Graph. Forum 31, 8 (Dec. 2012), 2478--2491.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicolas Menzel and Michael Guthe. 2010. Towards perceptual simplification of models with arbitrary materials. Comput. Graph. Forum 29, 7 (2010), 2261--2270. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Georges Nader, Kai Wang, Franck Hétroy-Wheeler, and Florent Dupont. 2016. Just noticeable distortion profile for flat-shaded 3D mesh surfaces. IEEE Trans. Visualiz. Comput. Graph. 22, 11 (Nov. 2016), 2423--2436. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2507578Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yixin Pan, I. Cheng, and A. Basu. 2005. Quality metric for approximating subjective evaluation of 3-D objects. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 7, 2 (apr 2005), 269--279. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bui Tuong Phong. 1975. Illumination for computer generated pictures. Commun. ACM 18, 6 (June 1975), 311--317. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/360825.360839Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jens Preiss, Felipe Fernandes, and Philipp Urban. 2014. Color-image quality assessment: From prediction to optimization. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23, 3 (2014), 1366--1378. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Qu and G. W. Meyer. 2008. Perceptually guided polygon reduction. IEEE Trans. Visualiz. Comput. Graph. 14, 5 (Sept 2008), 1015--1029. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2008.51Google Scholar
- Filippo Stanco, Sebastiano Battiato, and Giovanni Gallo. 2011. Digital Imaging for Cultural Heritage Preservation: Analysis, Restoration, and Reconstruction of Ancient Artworks. CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Louis L. Thurstone. 1927. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol. Rev. 34, 4 (1927), 273. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dihong Tian and G. AlRegib. 2008. Batex3: Bit allocation for progressive transmission of textured 3-d models. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Vid. Technol. 18, 1 (2008), 23--35. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fakhri Torkhani, Kai Wang, and Jean-Marc Chassery. 2012. A curvature tensor distance for mesh visual quality assessment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Graphics (ICCVG 2012), Vol. 7594. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 253--263. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33564-8_31Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fakhri Torkhani, Kai Wang, and Jean Marc Chassery. 2015. Perceptual quality assessment of 3D dynamic meshes: Subjective and objective studies. Sign. Process. Image Commun. 31 (2015), 185--204. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Vanhoey, B. Sauvage, O. Génevaux, F. Larue, and J.-M. Dischler. 2013. Robust fitting on poorly sampled data for surface light field rendering and image relighting. Comput. Graph. Forum 32, 6 (2013), 101--112. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12073Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kenneth Vanhoey, Basile Sauvage, Pierre Kraemer, Frédéric Larue, and Jean-Michel Dischler. 2015. Simplification of meshes with digitized radiance. Vis. Comput. 31, 6--8 (2015), 1011--1021. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-015-1124-9Google ScholarDigital Library
- Libor Vásǎ and Jan Rus. 2012. Dihedral angle mesh error: A fast perception correlated distortion measure for fixed connectivity triangle meshes. Comput. Graph. Forum 31, 5 (2012), 1715--1724. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2012.03176.xGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Bruce Walter, Sumanta N. Pattanaik, and Donald P. Greenberg. 2002. Using perceptual texture masking for efficient image synthesis. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 21. Wiley Online Library, 393--399.Google Scholar
- Kai Wang, Fakhri Torkhani, and Annick Montanvert. 2012. A fast roughness-based approach to the assessment of 3D mesh visual quality. Comput. Graph. 36, 7 (Nov. 2012), 808--818. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2012.06.004Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhou Wang and Alan C. Bovik. 2006. Modern Image Quality Assessment. Morgan 8 Claypool. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2200/S00010ED1V01Y200508IVM003Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhou Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli. 2004. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. Trans. Img. Proc. 13, 4 (April 2004), 600--612. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861Google ScholarDigital Library
- Z. Wang, E. P. Simoncelli, and A. C. Bovik. 2003. Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment. Conf. Rec. Asilomar Conf. Sign. Syst. Comput. 2, 1398--1402.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Benjamin Watson, Alinda Friedman, and Aaron McGaffey. 2001. Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH’01). ACM, New York, NY, 213--220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/383259.383283Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nathaniel Williams, David Luebke, Jonathan D. Cohen, Michael Kelley, and Brenden Schubert. 2003. Perceptually guided simplification of lit, textured meshes. In Proceedings of the 2003 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (I3D’03). ACM, New York, NY, 113--121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/641480.641503Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel N. Wood, Daniel I. Azuma, Ken Aldinger, Brian Curless, Tom Duchamp, David H. Salesin, and Werner Stuetzle. 2000. Surface light fields for 3D Photography. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH’00). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 287--296. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/344779.344925Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hojatollah Yeganeh and Zhou Wang. 2013. Objective quality assessment of tone-mapped images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22, 2 (2013), 657--667. 10577149DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2012.2221725Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Visual Quality Assessment of 3D Models: On the Influence of Light-Material Interaction
Recommendations
Objective quality assessment in free-viewpoint video production
This paper addresses the problem of objectively quantifying accuracy in free-viewpoint video production. Free-viewpoint video makes use of geometric scene reconstruction and renders novel views using the appearance sampled in multiple camera images. ...
Visual equivalence: towards a new standard for image fidelity
Efficient, realistic rendering of complex scenes is one of the grand challenges in computer graphics. Perceptually based rendering addresses this challenge by taking advantage of the limits of human vision. However, existing methods, based on predicting ...
Visual equivalence: towards a new standard for image fidelity
SIGGRAPH '07: ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 papersEfficient, realistic rendering of complex scenes is one of the grand challenges in computer graphics. Perceptually based rendering addresses this challenge by taking advantage of the limits of human vision. However, existing methods, based on predicting ...
Comments