skip to main content
10.1145/3129790.3129807acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecsaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Simulating architectures of situational-aware cyber-physical space

Published:11 September 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Situational aware cyber-physical space seamlessly incorporates computational and physical parts to monitor what is going on in the environment and utilize this data to choose and act. Graphical Modeling, Code generation and simulation help in diminishing the cost of building a situational aware cyber-physical space application since the architects can automatically get an executable application from the architectural model by applying the automatic transformation. In this paper, we present CAPS environment in which an architect can make diverse models to catch distinctive concerns in cyber-physical spaces, simulate and get an energy consumption and data traffic evaluation for their architectures.

References

  1. Ahcène Bounceur. 2016. CupCarbon: a new platform for designing and simulating smart-city and IoT wireless sensor networks (SCI-WSN). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of things and Cloud Computing. ACM, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Vivek Menon, Bharat Jayaraman, and Venu Govindaraju. 2011. The three rs of cyberphysical spaces. Computer 44, 9 (2011), 73--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Henry Muccini and Mohammad Sharaf. 2017. CAPS: A Tool for Architecting Situational-Aware Cyber-Physical Systems. In Software Architecture Workshops (ICSAW), 2017 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 286--289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Henry Muccini and Mohammad Sharaf. 2017. CAPS: Architecture Description of Situational Aware Cyber Physical Systems. In Software Architecture (ICSA), 2017 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 211--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mohammad Sharaf, Moamin Abughazala, Henry Muccini, and Mai Abusair. 2017. An Architecture Framework for Modelling and Simulation of Situational-Aware Cyber-Physical Systems. In Software Architecture: 11th European Conference, ECSA 2017, Canterbury, United Kingdom, September 11--15, 2017, Proceedings 11. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mohammad Sharaf, Moamin Abughazala, Henry Muccini, Mai Abusair. 2017. CAPSim: Simulation and Code Generation based on the CAPS. In Proceedings of The 11th European Conference on Software Architecture, Canterbury, United Kingdom, September 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Christos Tsigkanos, Timo Kehrer, and Carlo Ghezzi. 2016. Architecting dynamic cyber-physical spaces. Computing 98, 10 (2016), 1011--1040. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Simulating architectures of situational-aware cyber-physical space

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ECSA '17: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Proceedings
        September 2017
        215 pages
        ISBN:9781450352178
        DOI:10.1145/3129790

        Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 September 2017

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate48of72submissions,67%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader