skip to main content
research-article

Your Search Path Tells Others Where to Park: Towards Fine-Grained Parking Availability Crowdsourcing Using Parking Decision Models

Published: 11 September 2017 Publication History

Abstract

A main challenge faced by the state-of-the-art parking sensing systems is to infer the state of the spots not covered by participants’ parking/unparking events (called background availability) when the system penetration rate is limited. In this paper, we tackle this problem by exploring an empirical phenomenon that ignoring a spot along a driver’s parking search trajectory is likely due to the unavailability. However, complications caused by drivers’ preferences, e.g. ignoring the spots too far from the driver’s destination, have to be addressed based on human parking decisions. We build a model based on a dataset of more than 55,000 real parking decisions to predict the probability that a driver would take a spot, assuming the spot is available. Then, we present a crowdsourcing system, called ParkScan, which leverages the learned parking decision model in collaboration with the hidden Markov model to estimate background parking spot availability. We evaluated ParkScan with real-world data from both off-street scenarios (i.e., two public parking lots) and an on-street parking scenario (i.e., 35 urban blocks in Seattle). Both of the experiments showed that with a 5% penetration rate, ParkScan reduces over 12.9% of availability estimation errors for all the spots during parking peak hours, compared to the baseline using only the historical data. Also, even with a single participant driver, ParkScan cuts off at least 15% of the estimation errors for the spots along the driver’s parking search trajectory.

References

[1]
Heba Aly and Moustafa Youssef. 2013. Dejavu: an accurate energy-efficient outdoor localization system. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 154--163.
[2]
Alessio Bechini, Francesco Marcelloni, and Armando Segatori. 2013. A mobile application leveraging QR-codes to support efficient urban parking. In Sustainable Internet and ICT for Sustainability (SustainIT), 2013. IEEE, 1--3.
[3]
Itzhak Benenson, Karel Martens, and Slava Birfir. 2008. PARKAGENT: An agent-based model of parking in the city. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32, 6 (2008), 431--439.
[4]
Angela Stefania Bergantino, Angela De Carlo, Andrea Morone, and others. 2015. Individuals’ behaviour with respect to parking alternatives: a laboratory experiment. Technical Report. University Library of Munich, Germany.
[5]
Stephen D Boyles, Shoupeng Tang, and Avinash Unnikrishnan. 2015. Parking search equilibrium on a network. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 81 (2015), 390--409.
[6]
Michal Chalamish, David Sarne, and Sarit Kraus. 2007. Mass programmed agents for simulating human strategies in large scale systems. In Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM, 135.
[7]
Emmanouil Chaniotakis and Adam J Pel. 2015. Drivers’ parking location choice under uncertain parking availability and search times: A stated preference experiment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 82 (2015), 228--239.
[8]
Jim Cherian, Jun Luo, Hongliang Guo, Shen-Shyang Ho, and Richard Wisbrun. 2016. ParkGauge: Gauging the Occupancy of Parking Garages with Crowdsensed Parking Characteristics. In Mobile Data Management (MDM), 2016 17th IEEE International Conference on, Vol. 1. IEEE, 92--101.
[9]
Google Developers. 2017. ActivityRecognitionApi. (2017). https://developers.google.com/android/reference/com/google/android/gms/location/ActivityRecognitionApi/.
[10]
Liya Guo, Shan Huang, Jun Zhuang, and Adel W Sadek. 2013. Modeling parking behavior under uncertainty: a static game theoretic versus a sequential neo-additive capacity modeling approach. Networks and Spatial Economics 13, 3 (2013), 327--350.
[11]
Martin Hofmann, Philipp Tiefenbacher, and Gerhard Rigoll. 2012. Background segmentation with feedback: The pixel-based adaptive segmenter. In 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. IEEE, 38--43.
[12]
MYI Idris, YY Leng, EM Tamil, NM Noor, and Z Razak. 2009. Car Park System: A Review of Smart Parking System and its Technology. Information Technology Journal 8, 2 (2009).
[13]
ParkMe Inc. 2016. ParkMe. (2016). https://www.parkme.com/.
[14]
Seattle IT. 2015. Seattle Parking Transactions. (2015). https://data.seattle.gov/Transportation/Seattle-Parking-Transactions/updn-y53g/data.
[15]
Yifei Jiang, Xin Pan, Kun Li, Qin Lv, Robert P Dick, Michael Hannigan, and Li Shang. 2012. Ariel: Automatic wi-fi based room fingerprinting for indoor localization. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 441--450.
[16]
Yurong Jiang, Hang Qiu, Matthew McCartney, Gaurav Sukhatme, Marco Gruteser, Fan Bai, Donald Grimm, and Ramesh Govindan. 2015. CARLOC: Precisely Tracking Automobile Position. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 253--265.
[17]
Merkourios Karaliopoulos, Konstantinos Katsikopoulos, and Lambros Lambrinos. 2014. Bounded rationality can increase parking search efficiency. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing. ACM, 195--204.
[18]
Donnie H Kim, Younghun Kim, Deborah Estrin, and Mani B Srivastava. 2010. Sensloc: sensing everyday places and paths using less energy. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 43--56.
[19]
LADoT. 2017. LA Express Park. (2017). http://www.laexpresspark.org/.
[20]
Ruilin Liu. 2017. Parking Trajectory Dataset. (2017). http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~rl475/parkscan.html#dateset.
[21]
Rongxing Lu, Xiaodong Lin, Haojin Zhu, and Xuemin Shen. 2009. SPARK: a new VANET-based smart parking scheme for large parking lots. In INFOCOM 2009, IEEE. IEEE, 1413--1421.
[22]
Shuo Ma, Ouri Wolfson, and Bo Xu. 2014. Updetector: Sensing parking/unparking activities using smartphones. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science. ACM, 76--85.
[23]
Ayub Mamandi, Saleh Yousefi, and Reza Ebrahimi Atani. 2015. Game theory-based and heuristic algorithms for parking-lot search. In Computer Science and Software Engineering (CSSE), 2015 International Symposium on. IEEE, 1--8.
[24]
Elena Màrmol and Xavier Sevillano. 2016. QuickSpot: a video analytics solution for on-street vacant parking spot detection. Multimedia Tools and Applications 75, 24 (2016), 17711--17743.
[25]
Karel Martens and Itzhak Benenson. 2008. Evaluating urban parking policies with agent-based model of driver parking behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2046 (2008), 37--44.
[26]
Suhas Mathur, Tong Jin, Nikhil Kasturirangan, Janani Chandrasekaran, Wenzhi Xue, Marco Gruteser, and Wade Trappe. 2010. Parknet: drive-by sensing of road-side parking statistics. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 123--136.
[27]
Volodymyr Mnih and Geoffrey Hinton. 2010. Learning to detect roads in high-resolution aerial images. Computer Vision--ECCV 2010 (2010), 210--223.
[28]
Anandatirtha Nandugudi, Taeyeon Ki, Carl Nuessle, and Geoffrey Challen. 2014. Pocketparker: Pocketsourcing parking lot availability. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp ’14). ACM, 963--973.
[29]
Sarfraz Nawaz, Christos Efstratiou, and Cecilia Mascolo. 2013. Parksense: A smartphone based sensing system for on-street parking. In Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on Mobile computing 8 networking. ACM, 75--86.
[30]
Paul Newson and John Krumm. 2009. Hidden Markov map matching through noise and sparseness. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems. ACM, 336--343.
[31]
Gregory Pierce and Donald Shoup. 2013. Getting the prices right: an evaluation of pricing parking by demand in San Francisco. Journal of the American Planning Association 79, 1 (2013), 67--81.
[32]
G. Revathi and V.R.S. Dhulipala. 2012. Smart parking systems and sensors: A survey. In Computing, Communication and Applications (ICCCA), 2012 International Conference on. 1--5.
[33]
Mikko Rinne, Seppo Törmä, and D Kratinov. 2014. Mobile crowdsensing of parking space using geofencing and activity recognition. In 10th ITS European Congress, Helsinki, Finland. 16--19.
[34]
Andres Sanin, Conrad Sanderson, and Brian C Lovell. 2012. Shadow detection: A survey and comparative evaluation of recent methods. Pattern recognition 45, 4 (2012), 1684--1695.
[35]
Andrew Senior, Arun Hampapur, Ying-Li Tian, Lisa Brown, Sharath Pankanti, and Ruud Bolle. 2006. Appearance models for occlusion handling. Image and Vision Computing 24, 11 (2006), 1233--1243.
[36]
SFMTA. 2014. Sensor Independent Rate Adjustments Methodology and Implementation Plan. (2014). http://sfpark.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/SIRA-methodology-and-implementation-plan_2014_05-14.pdf.
[37]
SFMTA. 2017. SFpark. (2017). http://www.sfpark.org/.
[38]
Donald C Shoup. 2006. Cruising for parking. Transport Policy 13, 6 (2006), 479--486.
[39]
Sonia Soubam, Dipyaman Banerjee, Vinayak Naik, and Dipanjan Chakraborty. 2016. BluePark: tracking parking and un-parking events in indoor garages. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking. ACM, 33.
[40]
Thérèse Steenberghen, Karel Dieussaert, Sven Maerivoet, and Karel Spitaels. 2012. SUSTAPARK: an agentbased model for simulating parking search. URISA Journal 24, 1 (2012), 63--77.
[41]
Shoupeng Tang, Tarun Rambha, Reese Hatridge, Stephen Boyles, and Avinash Unnikrishnan. 2014. Modeling Parking Search on a Network by Using Stochastic Shortest Paths with History Dependence. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2467 (2014), 73--79.
[42]
Oliver Ullrich, Benjamin Brandt, Daniel Lückerath, and Naphtali Rishe. A Simple Model of Cruising for Garage Parking. In Proceedings of ASIM-Workshop STS/GMMS-ARGESIM Report, Vol. 51. 10--11.
[43]
Peter van der Waerden, Aloys Borgers, and Harry Timmermans. 2003. Travelers micro-behavior at parking lots: a model of parking choice behavior. In Processing of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1212.
[44]
Bo Xu, Ouri Wolfson, Jie Yang, Leon Stenneth, S Yu Philip, and Peter C Nelson. 2013. Real-time street parking availability estimation. In Mobile Data Management (MDM), 2013 IEEE 14th International Conference on, Vol. 1. IEEE, 16--25.
[45]
William Young. 1986. A model of vehicles movements in parking facilities. Mathematics and computers in simulation 28, 4 (1986), 305--309.
[46]
Jiangye Yuan. 2016. Automatic Building Extraction in Aerial Scenes Using Convolutional Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.06564 (2016).
[47]
Mingmin Zhao, Tao Ye, Ruipeng Gao, Fan Ye, Yizhou Wang, and Guojie Luo. 2015. Vetrack: Real time vehicle tracking in uninstrumented indoor environments. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 99--112.
[48]
Onno Zoeter, Christopher Dance, Stéphane Clinchant, and Jean-Marc Andreoli. 2014. New Algorithms for Parking Demand Management and a City-scale Deployment. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1819--1828.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Utilizing a Spatial Grid for Automated Parking Space Vacancy Detection2023 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)10.1109/CSCI62032.2023.00169(1022-1028)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2023
  • (2022)DroneSense: Leveraging Drones for Sustainable Urban-scale Sensing of Open Parking SpacesIEEE INFOCOM 2022 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM48880.2022.9796795(1769-1778)Online publication date: 2-May-2022
  • (2021)Driver Behavior-aware Parking Availability Crowdsensing System Using Truth DiscoveryACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/346020017:4(1-26)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Your Search Path Tells Others Where to Park: Towards Fine-Grained Parking Availability Crowdsourcing Using Parking Decision Models

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
      Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 1, Issue 3
      September 2017
      2023 pages
      EISSN:2474-9567
      DOI:10.1145/3139486
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 11 September 2017
      Accepted: 01 July 2017
      Revised: 01 July 2017
      Received: 01 May 2017
      Published in IMWUT Volume 1, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Crowdsourcing
      2. Human Decision Modeling
      3. Mobile Sensing
      4. Parking

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
      Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Utilizing a Spatial Grid for Automated Parking Space Vacancy Detection2023 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)10.1109/CSCI62032.2023.00169(1022-1028)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2023
      • (2022)DroneSense: Leveraging Drones for Sustainable Urban-scale Sensing of Open Parking SpacesIEEE INFOCOM 2022 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM48880.2022.9796795(1769-1778)Online publication date: 2-May-2022
      • (2021)Driver Behavior-aware Parking Availability Crowdsensing System Using Truth DiscoveryACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/346020017:4(1-26)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2021
      • (2021)Improvements in Perpendicular Reverse Parking by Directing Drivers’ Preliminary BehaviorIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.30917579(92003-92016)Online publication date: 2021
      • (2020)Privacy-Preserving Vehicle Assignment in the Parking Space Sharing SystemWireless Communications & Mobile Computing10.1155/2020/88626522020Online publication date: 17-Oct-2020
      • (2020)Physio-Stacks: Supporting Communication with Ourselves and Others via Tangible, Modular Physiological Devices22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services10.1145/3379503.3403562(1-12)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2020
      • (2020)Mobile Cyber-Physical Systems for Smart CitiesCompanion Proceedings of the Web Conference 202010.1145/3366424.3382121(546-548)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2020
      • (2019)Data Sets, Modeling, and Decision Making in Smart CitiesACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems10.1145/33552834:2(1-28)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2019
      • (2018)Crowd-enabled Processing of Trustworthy, Privacy-Enhanced and Personalised Location Based Services with Quality GuaranteeProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/32870452:4(1-25)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2018

      View Options

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media