skip to main content
10.1145/3132446.3134887acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesairConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Controller Design for a Skid-Steered Robot and Mapping for Surveillance Applications

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Skid-steered robots, with their robust structure and manoeuvrability, are generally used as outdoor mobile robots. Both kinematic and dynamic modelling of these robots is difficult due to sliding and rolling inherent in general curvilinear motion. In order to improve motion and pose estimation, this paper proposes a kinematic and dynamic model for skid-steered mobile robots. A PID controller, tuned using Genetic Algorithm, based on the dynamic model is then proposed for accurate control of the skid-steered robot. The dynamic model developed enables motion planning for general planar motion. The coefficient of rolling resistance, the coefficient of friction, and the shear deformation modulus, all of which have terrain-dependent values are accommodated in this model. Surveillance bots are of great importance in protecting and saving human life. In this context, mobile and multi-functional robots which map their surroundings are adopted as a means to reduce environmental restructuring and the number of devices used to cover a given area. Skid-steered robots are robust and, therefore, are ideal for surveillance applications.

References

  1. Björn Åstrand and Albert-Jan Baerveldt. 2002. An Agricultural Mobile Robot with Vision-Based Perception for Mechanical Weed Control. Autonomous Robots 13, 1 (2002), 21--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Caracciolo, A. de Luca, and S. Iannitti. 1999. Trajectory tracking control of a four-wheel differentially driven mobile robot. In Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C), Vol. 4. 2632--2638 vol.4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. David E. Goldberg. 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning (1st ed.). Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. G. Grisetti, C. Stachniss, and W. Burgard. 2007. Improved Techniques for Grid Mapping With Rao-Blackwellized Particle Filters. Trans. Rob. 23, 1 (Feb. 2007), 34--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Hans, B. Graf, and R. D. Schraft. 2002. Robotic home assistant Care-O-bot: past-present-future. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2002. Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on. 380--385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Edouard Ivanjko, Toni Petrinic, and Ivan Petrovic. 2010. Modelling of mobile robot dynamics. In 7th EUROSIM Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Vol. 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. K. K. Jajulwar and A. Y. Deshmukh. 2016. Design of SLAM based adaptive fuzzy tracking controller for autonomous navigation system. In 2016 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO). 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kyunghoon Kim, Soonil Bae, and Kwanghak Huh. 2010. Intelligent surveillance and security robot systems. In 2010 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts. 70--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Pazderski Dariusz Kozffowski, Krzysztof. 2004. Modeling and control of a 4-wheel skid-steering mobile robot. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 14, 4 (2004), 477--496. http://eudml.org/doc/207713Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Steven M. LaValle. 2006. Planning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. T. Lee, W. C. Lin, C. H. Huang, and Y. J. Huang. 2011. Wireless indoor surveillance robot. In SICE Annual Conference 2011. 2164--2169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. L. Liu, X. Zhu, and Y. Tang. 2013. Indoor surveillance robot controlled by a smart phone. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). 1875--1880.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Mandow, J. L. Martinez, J. Morales, J. L. Blanco, A. Garcia-Cerezo, and J. Gonzalez. 2007. Experimental kinematics for wheeled skid-steer mobile robots. In 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 1222-- 1227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. L. Martínez, A. Mandow, J. Morales, S. Pedraza, and A. García-Cerezo. 2005. Approximating Kinematics for Tracked Mobile Robots. Int. J. Rob. Res. 24, 10 (Oct. 2005), 867--878. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jingang Yi, Junjie Zhang, Dezhen Song, and Suhada Jayasuriya. 2007. IMU-based localization and slip estimation for skid-steered mobile robots. In 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2845--2850.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. W. Yu, O. Y. Chuy Jr., E. G. Collins Jr., and P. Hollis. 2010. Analysis and Experimental Verification for Dynamic Modeling of A Skid-Steered Wheeled Vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 26, 2 (April 2010), 340--353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AIR '17: Proceedings of the 2017 3rd International Conference on Advances in Robotics
    June 2017
    325 pages
    ISBN:9781450352949
    DOI:10.1145/3132446

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 June 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate69of140submissions,49%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader