skip to main content
10.1145/3132446.3134898acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesairConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design and Implementation of GA Tuned PID Controller for Desired Interaction and Trajectory Tracking of Wheeled Mobile Robot

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper presents the design and implementation of a PID control based trajectory tracking of a nonholonomic wheeled mobile robot (WMR) with the objective of matching desired time domain specification and specified interaction. The desired time domain specification of output Y(s) is represented as a step response of a second order system with designer specific desired damping ratio (ζ) and natural frequency (ωn). The problem of finding the unknown parameters of PID controllers is formulated in a genetic algorithm (GA) based optimization frame in which the objective is to minimize the difference between the response of the designed closed-loop system and that of the desired closed-loop system. This procedure has been illustrated for achieving the desired time domain specification for WMR, taking different settling time of output response. The interaction analyses are carried out using the concept of Relative Gain Array (RGA). The RGA for both the desired and designed closed-loop systems are found to be matching. It has shown that interaction parameter λ controls both the steady-state and transient response of the desired closed-loop system. The interaction parameter also acts as a parameter which controls the coupling and is chosen by the designer as a specification to be met by the designed closed-loop system with PID controller.

References

  1. Ahmed sabah Al-Araji. 2015. A Cognitive PID Neural Controller Design for Mobile Robot based on slice genetic algorithm. Engineering &Technology Journal 33, A (2015), 208--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jun Ye. 2008. Adaptive control of nonlinear PID-based analog neural networks for a nonholonomic mobile robot. Neurocomputing 71, 7-9 (2008), 1561--1565. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ahmed sabah Al-Araji and Khulood E. Dagher. 2014. Design of a Nonlinear PID Neural Trajectory Tracking Controller for Mobile Robot based on Optimization Algorithm. Engineering &Technology Journal 32, 4 (2014), 973--985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Julio E. Normey-Rico, Ismael Alcalá, Juan Gómez-Ortega, and Eduardo F. Camacho. 2001. Mobile robot path tracking using a robust PID controller. Control Engineering Practice 9, 11 (2001), 1209--1214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D. Hazry and M. Sugisaka. 2006. Proportional Control for Trajectory Tracking of A Wheeled Mobile Robot. 2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lluis Pacheco and Ningsu Luo. 2015. Testing PID and MPC Performance for Mobile Robot Local Path-following. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems (2015), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Qing Xu, Jiangming Kan, Shanan Chen, and Shengqi Yan. 2014. Fuzzy PID Based Trajectory Tracking Control of Mobile Robot and its Simulation in Simulink. International Journal of Control and Automation 7, 8 (2014), 233--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Elie Maalouf, Maarouf Saad, and Hamadou Saliah. 2006. A higher level path tracking controller for a four-wheel differentially steered mobile robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 54, 1 (2006), 23--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Turki Y.abdalla and Mustafa I. Hamzah. 2013. Trajectory Tracking Control for Mobile Robot using Wavelet Network. International Journal of Computer Applications 74, 3 (2013), 32--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. E. Bristol. 1966. On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 11, 1 (1966), 133--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Chengying Xu and Yung C. Shin. 2007. Interaction analysis for MIMO nonlinear systems based on a fuzzy basis function network model. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 158, 18 (2007), 2013--2025. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. H.R. Shaker and J. Stoustrup. 2012. Control configuration selection for multivariable descriptor systems. 2012 American Control Conference (ACC) (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Qian-Fang Liao, Wen-Jian Cai, and You-Yi Wang. 2013. Interaction analysis and loop pairing for MIMO processes described by type-2 T-S fuzzy models. 2013 IEEE 8th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. User manual: Qbot 2 for QUARC set up and configuration. 2015. Quanser, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Amir Haddadi, Peter Martin, and Cameron Fulford. 2015. Quanser Qbot 2 Complete Workbook (Instructor). Quanser, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Edouard Ivanjko, Toni Petrinić, and Ivan Petrović. 2010. Modelling of mobile robot dynamics. 2010 7th EUROSIM congress on Modelling and Simulation (Prague, Czech Republic, Sep. 6-10), 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Changlong Liu, Jian Pan, and Yufang Chang. 2016. PID and LQR trajectory tracking control for an unmanned quadrotor helicopter: Experimental studies. 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC) (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Design and Implementation of GA Tuned PID Controller for Desired Interaction and Trajectory Tracking of Wheeled Mobile Robot

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AIR '17: Proceedings of the 2017 3rd International Conference on Advances in Robotics
      June 2017
      325 pages
      ISBN:9781450352949
      DOI:10.1145/3132446

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate69of140submissions,49%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader