skip to main content
10.1145/3132787.3132803acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagessiggraph-asiaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Challenges in user experience design of image filtering apps

Published:27 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Photo filtering apps successfully deliver image-based stylization techniques to a broad audience, in particular in the ubiquitous domain (e.g., smartphones, tablet computers). Interacting with these inherently complex techniques has so far mostly been approached in two different ways: (1) by exposing many (technical) parameters to the user, resulting in a professional application that typically requires expert domain knowledge, or (2) by hiding the complexity via presets that only allows the application of filters but prevents creative expression thereon. In this work, we outline challenges of and present approaches for providing interactive image filtering on mobile devices, thereby focusing on how to make them usable for people in their daily life. This is discussed by the example of BeCasso, a user-centric app for assisted image stylization that targets two user groups: mobile artists and users seeking casual creativity. Through user research, qualitative and quantitative user studies, we identify and outline usability issues that showed to prevent both user groups from reaching their objectives when using the app. On the one hand, user-group-targeting has been improved by an optimized user experience design. On the other hand, multiple level of controls have been implemented to ease the interaction and hide the underlying complex technical parameters. Evaluations underline that the presented approach can increase the usability of complex image stylization techniques for mobile apps.

References

  1. Ken-ichi Anjyo, Shuhei Wemler, and William Baxter. 2006. Tweakable Light and Shade for Cartoon Animation. In Proc. NPAR. ACM, New York, 133--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Saeideh Bakhshi, David A. Shamma, Lyndon Kennedy, and Eric Gilbert. 2015. Why We Filter Our Photos and How It Impacts Engagement. In Proc. ICWSM. AAAI Press, 12--21. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/view/10573/10484Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Luca Benedetti, Holger Winnemöller, Massimiliano Corsini, and Roberto Scopigno. 2014. Painting with Bob: Assisted Creativity for Novices. In Proc. ACM UIST. ACM, New York, 419--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Moritz Gerl and Tobias Isenberg. 2013. Interactive Example-based Hatching. Computers & Graphics 37, 1--2 (2013), 65--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Marc Hassenzahl. 2005. The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product". Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 31--42. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Tobias Isenberg. 2016. Interactive NPAR: What Type of Tools Should We Create?. In Proc. NPAR. Eurographics Association, Goslar, Germany, 89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. David Mould and Paul L. Rosin. 2016. A Benchmark Image Set for Evaluating Stylization. In Proc. NPAR. Eurographics Association, Goslar, Germany, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. David Mould and Paul L. Rosin. 2017. Developing and Applying a Benchmark for Evaluating Image Stylization. Computers & Graphics 67, C (Oct. 2017), 58--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sebastian Pasewaldt, Amir Semmo, Jürgen Döllner, and Frank Schlegel. 2016. BeCasso: Artistic Image Processing and Editing on Mobile Devices. In Proc. SIGGRAPH ASIA Mobile Graphics and Interactive Applications. ACM, New York, 14:1--14:1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Michael P. Salisbury, Michael T. Wong, John F. Hughes, and David H. Salesin. 1997. Orientable Textures for Image-based Pen-and-ink Illustration. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH. ACM, New York, 401--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Amir Semmo, Jürgen Döllner, and Frank Schlegel. 2016. BeCasso: Image Stylization by Interactive Oil Paint Filtering on Mobile Devices. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Appy Hour. ACM, New York, 6:1--6:1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hideki Todo, Ken-ichi Anjyo, William Baxter, and Takeo Igarashi. 2007. Locally Controllable Stylized Shading. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3 (2007), 17:1--17:7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Holger Winnemöller. 2013. NPR in the Wild. In Image and Video based Artistic Stylisation, Paul Rosin and John Collomosse (Eds.). Computational Imaging and Vision, Vol. 42. Springer, London/Heidelberg, Chapter 17, 353--374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Holger Winnemöller, Jan Eric Kyprianidis, and Sven Olsen. 2012. XDoG: An eXtended Difference-of-Gaussians Compendium including Advanced Image Stylization. Computers & Graphics 36, 6 (Oct. 2012), 740--753. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Holger Winnemöller, Sven C. Olsen, and Bruce Gooch. 2006. Real-Time Video Abstraction. ACM Transactions on Graphics 25, 3 (July 2006), 1221--1226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Challenges in user experience design of image filtering apps

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SA '17: SIGGRAPH Asia 2017 Mobile Graphics & Interactive Applications
          November 2017
          116 pages
          ISBN:9781450354103
          DOI:10.1145/3132787

          Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 November 2017

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • abstract

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate178of869submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader