skip to main content
10.1145/3132847.3132965acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Modeling Student Learning Styles in MOOCs

Published: 06 November 2017 Publication History

Abstract

The recorded student activities in Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) provide us a unique opportunity to model their learning behaviors, identify their particular learning intents, and enable personalized assistance and guidance in online education. In this work, based on a thorough qualitative study of students' behaviors recorded in two MOOC courses with large student enrollments, we develop a non-parametric Bayesian model to capture students' sequential learning activities in a generative manner. Homogeneity of students' learning behaviors is captured by clustering them into latent student groups, where shared model structure characterizes the transitional patterns, intensity and temporal distribution of their learning activities. In the meanwhile, heterogeneity is captured by clustering students into different groups. Both qualitative and quantitative studies on those two MOOC courses confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed model in identifying students' learning behavior patterns and clustering them into related groups for predictive analysis. The identified student groups accurately predict student retention, course satisfaction and demographics.

References

[1]
A. Anderson, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and J. Leskovec. 2014. Engaging with massive online courses. In WWW'14. 687--698.
[2]
L. Barnard, W. Y. Lan, Y. M. To, V. O. Paton, and S. Lai. 2009. Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education Vol. 12, 1 (2009), 1--6.
[3]
C. A. Coleman, D. T. Seaton, and I. Chuang. 2015. Probabilistic use cases: discovering behavioral pattern for predicting certification L@S'15. 141--148.
[4]
R. S. Dunn, K. J. Dunn, and G. E. Price. 1989. Learning style inventory (LSI). Price Systems, Incorporated (PO Box 1818, Lawrence 66044).
[5]
T. S. Ferguson. 1973. A Bayesian analysis of some nonparametric problems. The annals of statistics (1973), 209--230.
[6]
D. Glance, M. Forsey, and M. Riley. 2013. The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses. First Monday, Vol. 18, 5 (2013).
[7]
R. Gnanadesikan, R. S. Pinkham, and L. P. Hughes. 1967. Maximum likelihood Estimation of the Parameters of the Beta Distribution from Smallest Order Statistics. Technometrics, Vol. 9, 4 (1967), 607--620.
[8]
P. J. Guo and K. Reinecke. 2014. Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs L@S'14. 21--30.
[9]
Z. Jiang, Y. Zhang, and X. Li. 2015. Learing behavior analysis and prediction based on mooc data. Journal of Computer Research and Development (2015).
[10]
K. Jordan. 2014. Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol. 15, 1 (2014).
[11]
R. F. Kizilcec, C. Piech, and E. Schneider. 2013. Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses LAK'13. 170--179.
[12]
M. Kloft, F. Stiehler, Z. Zheng, and N. Pinkwart. 2014. Predicting MOOC Dropout over Weeks Using Machine Learning Methods EMNLP 2014. 60--65.
[13]
R. Kop, F. Hélène, and J. S. F. Mak. 2011. A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, Vol. 12, 7 (2011), 74--93.
[14]
C. Lucchese, S. Orlando, R. Perego, F. Silvestri, and G. Tolomei. 2011. Identifying task-based sessions in search engine query logs Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 277--286.
[15]
F. G. Martin. 2012. Will massive open online courses change how we teach? Commun. ACM Vol. 55, 8 (2012), 26--28.
[16]
F. Mi and D. Yeung. 2015. Temporal Models for Predicting Student Dropout in Massive Open Online Courses ICDM Workshops 2015. 256--263.
[17]
R. M. Neal. 2000. Markov chain sampling methods for dirichlet process mixture models. Journal of computational and graphic statistics, Vol. 9, 2 (2000), 249--265.
[18]
H. Pashler, M. McDaniel, D. Rohrer, and R. Bjork. 2008. Learning styles concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest, Vol. 9, 3 (2008), 105--119.
[19]
J. Qiu, J. Tang, T. X. Liu, J. Gong, C. Zhang, Q. Zhang, and Y. Xue. 2016. Modeling and predicting learning behavior in MOOCs WSDM'16. 93--102.
[20]
A. Ramesh, D. Goldwasser, B. Huang, H. Daume III, and L. Getoor. 2014. Learning latent engagement patterns of students in online courses AAAI'14. 1272--1278.
[21]
D. T. Seaton, Y. Bergner, I. Chuang, P. Mitros, and D. E. Pritchard. 2014. Who does what in a massive open online courses? Commun. ACM Vol. 57, 4 (2014), 58--65.
[22]
M. D. Svinicki and N. M. Dixon. 1987. The Kolb Model Modified for Classroom Activities. College Teaching, Vol. 35, 2 (1987), 142--146.
[23]
F. Wang and L. Chen. 2016. A Nonlinear State Space Model for Identifying At-Risk Students in Open Online Courses EDM'16. 527--532.
[24]
M. Wen and C. P. Rose. 2014. Identifying latent study habits by mining learner behavior patterns in massive open online courses. In CIKM'14. 1983--1986.
[25]
J. Wilkowski, A. Deutsch, and D. M. Russell. 2014. Student skill and goal achievement in the mapping with google MOOC L@S'14. 3--10.
[26]
D. Yang, T. Sinha, D. Adamson, and C. P. Rosé. 2013. Turn on, tune in, drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses Proceedings of the 2013 NIPS Data-driven education workshop.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Review of Data Mining in Personalized Education: Current Trends and Future ProspectsFrontiers of Digital Education10.1007/s44366-024-0019-61:1(26-50)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Predicting Dropouts Before Enrollments in MOOCs: An Explainable and Self-Supervised ModelIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2023.331162716:6(4154-4167)Online publication date: Nov-2023
  • (2023)Adaptive learning in programming education: A systematic mapping of the literature2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10342933(1-7)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CIKM '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
November 2017
2604 pages
ISBN:9781450349185
DOI:10.1145/3132847
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 November 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. behavior modeling
  2. moocs
  3. probabilistic modeling
  4. sequential data mining

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

CIKM '17
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

CIKM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 171 of 855 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

CIKM '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)91
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21
Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Review of Data Mining in Personalized Education: Current Trends and Future ProspectsFrontiers of Digital Education10.1007/s44366-024-0019-61:1(26-50)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Predicting Dropouts Before Enrollments in MOOCs: An Explainable and Self-Supervised ModelIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2023.331162716:6(4154-4167)Online publication date: Nov-2023
  • (2023)Adaptive learning in programming education: A systematic mapping of the literature2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10342933(1-7)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Predictive Video Analytics in Online Courses: A Systematic Literature ReviewTechnology, Knowledge and Learning10.1007/s10758-023-09697-z29:4(1907-1937)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2023
  • (2022)Deep cognitive diagnosis model for predicting students’ performanceFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2021.08.019126:C(252-262)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2020)Predicting MOOCs Dropout with a Deep ModelWeb Information Systems Engineering – WISE 202010.1007/978-3-030-62008-0_34(488-502)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2020
  • (2019)Prediction in MOOCs: A Review and Future Research DirectionsIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2018.285680812:3(384-401)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
  • (2019)Modeling the Effort and Learning Ability of Students in MOOCsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2019.29379857(128035-128042)Online publication date: 2019
  • (2019)Visualizing Student Interactions to Support Instructors in Virtual Learning EnvironmentsUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Methods and Tools10.1007/978-3-030-23560-4_33(445-464)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2019
  • (2018)Modeling Sequential Online Interactive Behaviors with Temporal Point ProcessProceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3269206.3271782(873-882)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2018

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media