skip to main content
10.1145/3132847.3133108acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Visualizing Deep Neural Networks with Interaction of Super-pixels

Published:06 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

An effective way to visualize the prediction of deep neural networks on an image is to decompose the prediction into the contribution of units (pixels or patches). In the existing works, these units are largely considered independently, thus limiting the performance of visualization. In this paper, we propose a new predication visualization method that uses super-pixel as a contribution unit. Moreover, our method takes into consideration of the interaction of adjacent super-pixels. We implement our technique and evaluate its performance with various images. Our results show its excellent performance.

References

  1. Radhakrishna Achanta, Appu Shaji, Kevin Smith, Aurelien Lucchi, Pascal Fua, and Sabine Süsstrunk. 2012. SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, Vol. 34, 11 (2012), 2274--2282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sebastian Bach, Alexander Binder, Grégoire Montavon, Frederick Klauschen, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Wojciech Samek. 2015. On pixel-wise explanations for non-linear classifier decisions by layer-wise relevance propagation. PloS one, Vol. 10, 7 (2015), e0130140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. 2012. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge 2012 (VOC2012) Results. http://www.pascal-network.org/challenges/VOC/voc2012/workshop/index.html. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. Why Should I Trust You?: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 1135--1144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Marko Robnik-Sikonja and Igor Kononenko. 2008. Explaining classifications for individual instances. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 20, 5 (2008), 589--600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Matthew D Zeiler and Rob Fergus. 2014. Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks European conference on computer vision. Springer, 818--833.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiyuan Zhang, Samy Bengio, Hardt, Moritz, Benjamin Recht, and Oriol Vinyals. 2017. Understanding deep learning requires rethiking genrealization International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolei Zhou, Aditya Khosla, Agata Lapedriza, Aude Oliva, and Antonio Torralba. 2016. Learning deep features for discriminative localization Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2921--2929.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Luisa M Zintgraf, Taco S Cohen, Tameem Adel, and Max Welling. 2017. Visualizing deep neural network decisions: prediction difference analysis International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
    November 2017
    2604 pages
    ISBN:9781450349185
    DOI:10.1145/3132847

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 6 November 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    CIKM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate171of855submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader