skip to main content
10.1145/3134230.3134236acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiwoarConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Real-time Embedded Recognition of Sign Language Alphabet Fingerspelling in an IMU-Based Glove

Published:21 September 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Data gloves have numerous applications, including enabling novel human-computer interaction and automated recognition of large sets of gestures, such as those used for sign language. For most of these applications, it is important to build mobile and self-contained applications that run without the need for frequent communication with additional services on a back-end server. We present in this paper a data glove prototype, based on multiple small Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs), with a glove-embedded classifier for the french sign language. In an extensive set of experiments with 57 participants, our system was tested by repeatedly fingerspelling the French Sign Language (LSF) alphabet. Results show that our system is capable of detecting the LSF alphabet with a mean accuracy score of 92% and an F1 score of 91%, with all detections performed on the glove within 63 milliseconds.

References

  1. Helene Brashear, Thad Starner, Paul Lukowicz, and Holger Junker. 2003. Using multiple sensors for mobile sign language recognition. In ISWC 2003. IEEE Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Maria E Cabrera, Juan Manuel Bogado, Leonardo Fermin, Raul Acuna, and Dimitar Ralev. 2012. Glove-based gesture recognition system. In Proc. of Intl. Conf. on climbing and walking robots and the support technologies for mobile machines. 747--753.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Pengfei Gui, Liqiong Tang, and Subhas Mukhopadhyay. 2015. MEMS based IMU for tilting measurement: Comparison of complementary and kalman filter based data fusion. In ICIEA 2015. IEEE, 2004--2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Christopher-Eyk Hrabia, Katrin Wolf, and Mathias Wilhelm. 2013. Whole hand modeling using 8 wearable sensors: biomechanics for hand pose prediction. In Proceedings of the 4th Augmented Human International Conference. ACM, 21--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Yu Huang, Dorothy Monekosso, Hui Wang, and Juan Carlos Augusto. 2011. A concept grounding approach for glove-based gesture recognition. In Intelligent Environments (IE), 2011 7th International Conference on. IEEE, 358--361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eunseok Jeong, Jaehong Lee, and DaeEun Kim. 2011. Finger-gesture recognition glove using velostat (ICCAS 2011). In Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), 2011 11th International Conference on. IEEE, 206--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wu Jiangqin, Gao Wen, Song Yibo, Liu Wei, and Pang Bo. 1998. A simple sign language recognition system based on data glove. In Signal Processing Proceedings, 1998. ICSP'98. 1998 Fourth International Conference on, Vol. 2. IEEE, 1257--1260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kunal Kadam, Rucha Ganu, Ankita Bhosekar, and SD Joshi. 2012. American Sign Language Interpreter. In Technology for Education (T4E), 2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on. IEEE, 157--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Yousuf Khambaty, Rolando Quintana, Mehdi Shadaram, Sana Nehal, Muneeb Ali Virk, Waqar Ahmed, and Ghayas Ahmedani. 2008. Cost effective portable system for sign language gesture recognition. In System of Systems Engineering, 2008. SoSE'08. IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jonghwa Kim, Johannes Wagner, Matthias Rehm, and Elisabeth André. 2008. Bi-channel sensor fusion for automatic sign language recognition. In Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition, 2008. FG'08. 8th IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. T Kuroda, Y Tabata, A Goto, H Ikuta, M Murakami, and others. 2004. Consumer price data-glove for sign language recognition. In Proc. of 5th Intl Conf. Disability, Virtual Reality Assoc. Tech., Oxford, UK. 253--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cemil Oz and Ming C Leu. 2007. Linguistic properties based on American Sign Language isolated word recognition with artificial neural networks using a sensory glove and motion tracker. Neurocomputing 70, 16 (2007), 2891--2901. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. Park, J. Lee, and J. Bae. 2014. Development of a finger motion measurement system using linear potentiometers. In IEEE/ASME Intl. Conf. on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. 125--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011), 2825--2830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. John Kangchun Perng, Brian D. Fisher, Seth Hollar, and Kristofer S. J. Pister. 1999. Acceleration Sensing Glove (ASG). In Proc. of Third International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC 1999). 178--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. David J Sturman and David Zeltzer. 1994. A survey of glove-based input. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 14, 1 (1994), 30--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Netchanok Tanyawiwat and Surapa Thiemjarus. 2012. Design of an assistive communication glove using combined sensory channels. In Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN), 2012 Ninth International Conference on. IEEE, 34--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Noor Tubaiz, Tamer Shanableh, and Khaled Assaleh. 2015. Glove-based continuous Arabic sign language recognition in user-dependent mode. Human-Machine Systems, IEEE Transactions on 45, 4 (2015), 526--533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Satjakarn et al. Vutinuntakasame. 2011. An assistive body sensor network glove for speech-and hearing-impaired disabilities. In Body Sensor Networks (BSN), 2011 International Conference on. IEEE, 7--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Thomas G. Zimmerman, Jaron Lanier, Chuck Blanchard, Steve Bryson, and Young Harvill. 1987. A Hand Gesture Interface Device. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Interface (CHI '87). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 189--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Real-time Embedded Recognition of Sign Language Alphabet Fingerspelling in an IMU-Based Glove

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      iWOAR '17: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction
      September 2017
      83 pages
      ISBN:9781450352239
      DOI:10.1145/3134230

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 September 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      iWOAR '17 Paper Acceptance Rate12of19submissions,63%Overall Acceptance Rate46of73submissions,63%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader