skip to main content
10.1145/3134302.3134330acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompsystechConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Is the Visitor Reading or Navigating?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

When a user browses a webpage, he or she generates a lot of data while moving with mouse or touchpad. The movement data hides useful information about the activity of the user. Knowing this might be useful for the perfect timing of hints online. In this paper, we propose our method for detection of browsing activity, specifically reading content and navigating. We describe our experiment in simulated news portal to acquire the dataset and we present the detection method results.

References

  1. Ernesto Arroyo, Ted Selker, and Willy Wei. 2006. Usability Tool for Analysis of Web Designs Using Mouse Tracks. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 484--489. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mon Chu Chen, John R. Anderson, and Myeong Ho Sohn. 2001. What Can a Mouse Cursor Tell Us More?: Correlation of Eye/Mouse Movements on Web Browsing. In CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 281--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Daniela Chudá, Peter Krátky, and Jozef Tvarožek. 2015. Mouse Clicks Can Recognize Web Page Visitors!. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '15 Companion). ACM, 21--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mark Claypool, Phong Le, Makoto Wased, and David Brown. 2001. Implicit Interest Indicators. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 33--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Diane Kelly and Nicholas J. Belkin. 2004. Display Time As Implicit Feedback: Understanding Task Effects. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 377--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Joseph A Konstan, Bradley N Miller, David Maltz, Jonathan L Herlocker, Lee R Gordon, and John Riedl. 1997. Applying Collaborative Filtering to Usenet News. Commun. ACM 40, 3 (1997), 77--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Peter Krátky and Daniela Chudá. 2016. Estimating Gender and Age of Web Page Visitors from the Way They Use Their Mouse. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (WWW '16 Companion). ACM, 61--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Masahiro Morita and Yoichi Shinoda. 1994. Information Filtering Based on User Behavior Analysis and Best Match Text Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '94). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 272--281. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=188490.188583 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Youssef Nakkabi, Issa Traore, and Ahmed Awad E Ahmed. 2010. Improving Mouse Dynamics Biometric Performance Using Variance Reduction via Extractors With Separate Features. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 40, 6 (2010), 1345--1353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Douglas W Oard and Jinmook Kim. 2001. Modeling information content using observable behavior. In Proceedings of the 64th Annual Conference of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 481--488.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Rachael Rafter and Barry Smyth. 2001. Passive Profiling from Server Logs in an Online Recruitment Environment. In Workshop on Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization at the the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chao Shen, Zhongmin Cai, Xiaohong Guan, and Roy Maxion. 2014. Performance evaluation of anomaly-detection algorithms for mouse dynamics. Computers & Security 45 (2014), 156--171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ryen W. White, Ian Ruthven, and Joemon M. Jose. 2002. Finding Relevant Documents Using Top Ranking Sentences: An Evaluation of Two Alternative Schemes. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bangzuo Zhang, Yu Guan, Haichao Sun, Qingchao Liu, and Jun Kong. 2010. Survey of user behaviors as implicit feedback. In 2010 International Conference on Computer, Mechatronics, Control and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 6. 345--348.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nan Zheng, Aaron Paloski, and Haining Wang. 2016. An Efficient User Verification System Using Angle-Based Mouse Movement Biometrics. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 18, 3 (2016), 1--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CompSysTech '17: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies
    June 2017
    358 pages
    ISBN:9781450352345
    DOI:10.1145/3134302

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 June 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    CompSysTech '17 Paper Acceptance Rate42of107submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate241of492submissions,49%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader