skip to main content
10.1145/3136457.3136474acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmigConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Characterizing the relationship between environment layout and crowd movement using machine learning

Published:08 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Crowd simulations facilitate the study of how an environment layout impacts the movement and behavior of its inhabitants. However, simulations are computationally expensive, which make them infeasible when used as part of interactive systems (e.g., Computer-Assisted Design software). Machine learning models, such as neural networks (NN), can learn observed behaviors from examples, and can potentially offer a rational prediction of a crowd's behavior efficiently. To this end, we propose a method to predict the aggregate characteristics of crowd dynamics using regression neural networks (NN). We parametrize the environment, the crowd distribution and the steering method to serve as inputs to the NN models, while a number of common performance measures serve as the output. Our preliminary experiments show that our approach can help users evaluate a large number of environments efficiently.

References

  1. Aniket Bera, Sujeong Kim, and Dinesh Manocha. 2016a. Interactive Crowd-Behavior Learning for Surveillance and Training. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 36, 6 (2016), 37--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aniket Bera, Sujeong Kim, and Dinesh Manocha. 2016b. Online parameter learning for data-driven crowd simulation and content generation. Computers & Graphics 55 (2016), 68--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. FM Garcia, M Kapadia, and NI Badler. 2014. GPU-based dynamic search on adaptive resolution grids. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA (2014), 1631--1638.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. J. Guy, J. Chhugani, C. Kim, N. Satish, M. Lin, D. Manocha, and P. Dubey. 2009. Clearpath: highly parallel collision avoidance for multi-agent simulation. ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics SCA (2009), 177--187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Helbing and P. Molnar. 1995. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical review 51, 5 (1995), 4282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T Huang, M Kapadia, NI Badler, and M Kallmann. 2014. Path planning for coherent and persistent groups. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA (2014), 1652--1659.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Guy S.J., Chhugani J., Curtis S., Dubey P., Lin M., and Manocha D. 2010. PLEdestrians: a least-effort approach to crowd simulation. ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics SCA (2010), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M Kallmann and M Kapadia. 2014. Navigation meshes and real-time dynamic planning for virtual worlds. Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference, SIGGRAPH (2014), 3:1--3:81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Kallmann and M. Kapadia. 2016. Geometric and discrete path planning for interactive virtual worlds. ACM SIGGRAPH (2016), 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M Kapadia, A Beacco, FM Garcia, V Reddy, N Pelechano, and NI Badler. 2013a. Multidomain real-time planning in dynamic environments. The ACM SIGGRAPH / Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, SCA (2013), 115--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M Kapadia, FM Garcia, CD Boatright, and NI Badler. 2013b. Dynamic search on the GPU. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2013), 3332--3337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Kapadia, N. Pelechano, J. Allbeck, and N. Badler. 2015. Virtual crowds: steps toward behavioral realism. Vol. 7. Synthesis Lectures on Visual Computing. 1--270 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Kapadia, S. Singh, W. Hewlett, and P. Faloutsos. 2009. Egocentric affordance fields in pedestrian steering. ACM SIGGRAPH I3D (2009), 215--223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mubbasir Kapadia, Matthew Wang, Glenn Reinman, and Petros Faloutsos. 2011a. Improved Benchmarking for Steering Algorithms. 4th International Conference on Motion in Games (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mubbasir Kapadia, Matthew Wang, Shawn Singh, Glenn Reinman, and Petros Faloutsos. 2011b. Scenario Space: Characterizing Coverage, Quality, and Failure of Steering Algorithms. ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. CoRR abs/1412.6980 (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. K. H. Lee, M. G. Choi, Q. Hong, and J. Lee. 2007. Group behavior from video: a data-driven approach to crowd simulation. ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics SCA 1 (2007), 109--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Lerner, Y. Chrysanthou, and D. Lischinski. 2007. Crowds by Example. CGF 26, 3 (2007), 655--664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. L. Magee. 1990. R2 measures based on Wald and likelihood ratio joint significance tests. The American Statistician (1990), 250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R. A. Metoyer and J. K. Hodgins. 2003. Reactive pedestrian path following from examples. CASA 20 (2003), 149--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. K Ninomiya, M Kapadia, A Shoulson, FM Garcia, and NI Badler. 2015. Planning approaches to constraint-aware navigation in dynamic environments. Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation (2015), 119--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. N. Pelechano, J. M. Allbeck, and N. I. Badler. 2007. Controlling individual agents in high-density crowd simulation. ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics SCA 1 (2007), 108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. C. W. Reynolds. 1987. A distributed behavioral model. ACM SIGGRAPH 21, 4 (1987), 25--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. C. W. Reynolds. 1999. Steering behaviors for autonomous characters. GDC, Citeseer (1999), 763--782.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. P. Scovanner and M. F. Tappen. 2009. Learning pedestrian dynamics from the real world. In 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision. 381--388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Shawn Singh, Mubbasir Kapadia, Glenn Reinman, and Petros Faloutsos. 2009a. Steer-Bench: A Benchmark Suite for Evaluating Steering Behaviors. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Shawn Singh, Mubbasir Kapadia, Glenn Reinman, and Petros Faloutsos. 2009b. Steer-Suite: An Open Framework For Developing, Evaluating and Sharing Steering Algorithms. International Conference on Motion in Games (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. S. Singh, M. Kapadia, G. Reinman, and P. Faloutsos. 2011. Footstep navigation for dynamic crowds. CAVW 22, 2-3 (2011), 151--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. Snape, S. J. Guy, D. Vembar, A. Lake, and M. C. Lin. 2012. Reciprocal collision avoidance and navigation for video games. Game Developers Conf. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. P. Torrens, X. Li, and W. A. Griffin. 2011. Building Agent-Based Walking Models by Machine-Learning on Diverse Databases of Space-Time Trajectory Samples. Transactions in GIS 15 (2011), 67--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Jur van den Berg, Ming C. Lin, and Dinesh Manocha. 2008. Reciprocal velocity obstacles for real-time multi-agent navigation. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation (2008), 1928--1935.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. M. Whittle. 2014. Gait analysis: an introduction. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Characterizing the relationship between environment layout and crowd movement using machine learning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MIG '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Motion in Games
        November 2017
        128 pages
        ISBN:9781450355414
        DOI:10.1145/3136457

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 November 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate-9of-9submissions,100%

        Upcoming Conference

        MIG '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader