ABSTRACT
Since the beginning of the 21st century, computer technologies are more and more able to understand the real world by the informational structure of meta-data. With the advent of new tools, the traditional distinction between culture and technology has become obsolete. In this paper, we will discuss different approaches to create mixed reality applications for Indigenous cultural preservation and also best practices of developing augmented and mixed reality systems in two different cultural contexts. We will describe several technical aspects of mobile devices, tangible user interfaces and context-sensitive services in information systems for museums and local communities developed at the researchers' affiliated institutions. Our initial evaluations show that the systems are engaging and encourage intergenerational knowledge exchange, thus have the potential to help in cultural preservation of partner communities.
- Yeo, A. W., Zaman, T., and Kulathuramaiyer, N. 2013. Indigenous Knowledge Management in the Kelabit community in Eastern Malaysia: Insights And Reflections For Contemporary KM Design. Int. J. of Sociotechnology and Know. Dev. (IJSKD), 5, 1, 23--36. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harms, R. 1979. Oral Tradition and Ethnicity. J. of Interdisciplinary 10, 1, 61--85.Google Scholar
- Mushiba, M., Gallery, P., and Winschiers-Theophilus, H. 2016. On Persuading an OvaHerero Community to Join the Wikipedia Community. In Proc. of Int. Con. on Culture, Tech., and Com. Springer International Publishing, 1--18.Google Scholar
- N. Bidwell and D. Hardy. 2009. Dilemmas in Situating Participation in Rural Ways of Saying. In Pro. of the 21st Ann. Conf. of the Australian CHI, New York, NY, USA, 145--152. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Milgram, P., Drascic, D., Julius, J., Grodski, Restogi, A., Zhai, S. and Zhou, C. 1995. Merging Real and Virtual Worlds. In Proc. of IMAGINA '95, Monte Carlo, 218--230.Google Scholar
- Schäfer, M. T. 2011. Bastard culture! How User Participation Transforms Cultural Production. Amsterdam University Press, 256.Google Scholar
- Ishii, H., and Ullmer, B. 1997. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits, and Atoms. In Proc. of CHI'97, 234--241. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zaman, T. and Winschier-Theophilus, H. 2015. Penan's Oroo Short Message Signs (PO-SMS): Co-design of A Digital Jungle Sign Language Application. In INTERACT 2015, Part II, LNCS 9297, 489--504.Google Scholar
- Gleasure, R., and Feller, J. 2016. A Rift in the Ground: Theorizing the Evolution of Anchor Values in Crowdfunding Communities through the Oculus Rift Case Study. J. of the Asso. for Info. Systems, 17, 10, 708.Google Scholar
- Waldura, M. 1993. The Magic Flute Two Part. Musical Concept Of An Uncomposed Opera. Archives of Musicology, 259--290.Google Scholar
- Classen, C., and Howes, D. 2006. The Museum as Sensescape: Western Sensibilities and Indigenous Artifacts. Sensible objects: Colonialism, Museums and Material Culture, 5, 199.Google Scholar
- Marshall, P., Rogers, Y. and Hornecker, E. 2007. Are Tangible Interfaces Really Any Better Than Other Kinds Of Interfaces? Extended CHI'07 Abstracts. New York, ACM, 2817--2820.Google Scholar
- Smith, A., Reitsma, L., van den Hoven, E., Kotzé, P., and Coetzee, L. 2011. Towards Preserving Indigenous Oral Stories Using Tangible Objects. In Proc. of Cul. and computing (Culture Computing), 2nd Int. Conf. on IEEE, 86--91. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ketelhut, D. J. 2007. The Impact Of Student Self-Efficacy On Scientific Inquiry Skills: An Exploratory Investigation In River City, A Multi-User Virtual Environment. J. of Science Education and Technology, 16,1, 99--111.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Plimmer, B., He, L., Zaman, T., Karunanayaka, K., Yeo, A.W., Jengan, G., Blagojevic, R., and Yi-Luen, E.D. 2015. New Interaction Tools For Preserving an Old Language. In Proc. of CHI2015, ACM. 3493--3502. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Closing the Distance: Mixed and Augmented Reality, Tangibles and Indigenous Culture Preservation
Recommendations
A Survey of Augmented, Virtual, and Mixed Reality for Cultural Heritage
A multimedia approach to the diffusion, communication, and exploitation of Cultural Heritage (CH) is a well-established trend worldwide. Several studies demonstrate that the use of new and combined media enhances how culture is experienced. The benefit ...
Virtual and augmented reality for cultural computing and heritage: a case study of virtual exploration of underwater archaeological sites (preprint)
Special Issue on Cultural TechnologyThe paper presents different issues dealing with both the preservation of cultural heritage using virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies in a cultural context. While the VR/AR technologies are mentioned, the attention is paid to ...
Virtual and augmented reality for cultural computing and heritage: a case study of virtual exploration of underwater archaeological sites (preprint)
The paper presents different issues dealing with both the preservation of cultural heritage using virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies in a cultural context. While the VR/AR technologies are mentioned, the attention is paid to ...
Comments