skip to main content
10.1145/3141788.3141792acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Assessing the impact of music on basic taste perception using time intensity analysis

Published:13 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Several recent studies have examined the impact of music on the evaluation of food and drink, but none have relied on time-based methods. Since music and food/drink are both time-varying in nature, it would seem only appropriate to take temporality into account when studying the impact of music on the eating/drinking experience. A common method of time-based sensory evaluation of food products is time-intensity (TI), where a specific sensory attribute is measured over time. In the present investigation, we used TI analysis to measure temporal changes in sweetness and sourness evaluations of an off-dry white wine when the music stimulus changed from a soundtrack commonly associated with sweetness to one associated with sourness instead, and vice versa. The results revealed that a change of soundtrack results in a change in taste intensity (for both sweetness and sourness) in the same direction as the change in the soundtrack. More specifically, a switch from the sweet to the sour soundtrack enhanced the intensity of sourness, whereas a switch from sour to sweet soundtrack enhanced the perceived intensity of sweetness. Potential implications for the mechanisms underlying the auditory modification of taste and opportunities for future studies are discussed.

References

  1. Chen, K., Zhou, B., Chen, S., He, S., & Zhou, W. (2013). Olfaction spontaneously highlights visual saliency map. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 280:20131729.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1990). Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 2, 263-275. Taste rating -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Sweet-sour Sour-sweet Inte nsity diffe re nc e (30s -15s) Soundtrack Sweet Sour * * Assessing the Impact of Music on Basic Taste MHFI’17, November 13, 2017, Glasgow, UKGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dehaene, S., Changeux, J. P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 204-211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Koch, C., & Tsuchiya, N. (2007). Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 16-22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Spence, C. (2014). Orienting attention: A crossmodal perspective. In A. C. Nobre & S. Kastner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of attention (pp. 446-471). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Stevenson, R. J. (2012). The role of attention in flavour perception. Flavour, 1:2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Marks, L. E., & Wheeler, M. E. (1998). Attention and the detectability of weak taste stimuli. Chemical Senses, 23, 19-29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ashkenazi, A., & Marks, L. E. (2004). Effect of endogenous attention on detection of weak gustatory and olfactory flavors. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 596-608.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Chiou, R., & Rich, A. N. (2012). Cross-modality correspondence between pitch and spatial location modulates attentional orienting. Perception, 41, 339-353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lee, W. E., III, & Pangborn, R. M. (1986). Time–intensity: The temporal aspects of sensory perception. Food Technology, 40, 71-78. 82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cadena, R. S., & Bolini, H. M. A. (2011). Time–intensity analysis and acceptance test for traditional and light vanilla ice cream. Food Research International, 44, 677-683.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. King, B. M., & Duineveld, C. A. A. (1999). Changes in bitterness as beer ages naturally. Food Quality and Preference, 10, 315-324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Goodstein, E. S., Bohlscheid, J. C., Evans, M., & Ross, C. F. (2014). Perception of flavor finish in model white wine: A time-intensity study. Food Quality and Preference, 36, 50-60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sokolowsky, M., & Fischer, U. (2012). Evaluation of bitterness in white wine applying descriptive analysis, time-intensity analysis, and temporal dominance of sensations analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta, 732, 46-52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Wang, Q. (J.), Woods, A., & Spence, C. (2015). “What’s your taste in music?” A comparison of the effectiveness of various soundscapes in evoking specific tastes. i-Perception, 6:6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kontukoski, M., Luomala, H., Mesz, B., Sigman, M., Trevisan, M., Rotola-Pukkila, M., et al. (2015). Sweet and sour: Music and taste associations. Nutrition and Food Science, 45, 357-376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Pinheiro, A. C. M., Nunes, C. A., & Vietoris, V. (2013). Sensomaker: A tool for sensorial characterization of food products. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 37, 199- 201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Nunes, C. A., & Pinheiro, A. C. M. (2015). Sensomaker User Guide. Downloaded from http://ufla.br/sensomaker/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Woods, A. T., Poliakoff, E., Lloyd, D. M., Dijksterhuis, G. B., & Thomas, A. (2010). Flavour expectation: The effect of assuming homogeneity on drink perception. Chemosensory Perception, 3, 174-181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Crisinel, A.-S., Cosser, S., King, S., Jones, R., Petrie, J., & Spence, C. (2012). A bittersweet symphony: Systematically modulating the taste of food by changing the sonic properties of the soundtrack playing in the background. Food Quality and Preference, 24, 201-204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Crawshaw, A. (2012). How musical emotion may provide clues for understanding the observed impact of music on gustatory and olfactory perception in the context of wine-tasting. Unpublished manuscript.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Spence, C., & Wang, Q. (J.). (2015). Wine & music (II): Can you taste the music? Modulating the experience of wine through music and sound. Flavour, 4:33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Bachorik, J. P., Bangert, M., Loui, P., Lark, K., Berger, J., Rowe, R., & Schlaug, G. (2009). Emotion in motion: Investigating the time-course of emotional judgments of musical stimuli. Music Perception, 26, 355-364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Woods, A. T., Lloyd, D. M., Kuenzel, J., Poliakoff, E., Dijksterhuis, G. B., & Thomas, A. (2011). Expected taste intensity affects response to sweet drinks in primary taste cortex, Neuroreport, 22, 365-369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Plassmann, H., O’Doherty, J., Shiv, B., & Rangel, A. (2008). Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness. PNAS, 105, 1050-1054.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Spence, C., & Wang, Q. (J.) (2015b). Wine & music (I): On the crossmodal matching of wine & music. Flavour, 4:3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Assessing the impact of music on basic taste perception using time intensity analysis

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MHFI 2017: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCHI International Workshop on Multisensory Approaches to Human-Food Interaction
      November 2017
      33 pages

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 November 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6of8submissions,75%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader