skip to main content
10.1145/3141798.3141819acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfablearnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Texture, Buttons, Sound and Code: Modal Preference and the Formation of Expert Identities

Published:21 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper examines a making project in a 9th grade English language arts (ELA) class through the lenses of multimodality and identity. Students retold popular picture books in a tactile form for an audience of children with visual impairments. They embedded audio in 3D printed pages using copper tape and Makey Makey boards that interacted with Scratch programs to play student-composed sound. Some students gravitated to certain modes and tools while designing their tactile books. As they developed expertise, they were recognized as resources within their groups and class. This study considers how giving students the opportunity to compose in multiple modes with a variety of tools during a collaborative design experience may offer opportunities for the development of expert identities.

References

  1. David Barton, Mary Hamilton, and Roz Ivanic. 2005. Situated literacies: reading and writing in context, London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alison Boardman, Joseph Polman, Bridget Dalton, and Karla Scornavacco. 2016. From Units to Projects: Designing and Implementing PBL in High School Language Arts. Paper at the Annual Convention of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio TexasGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bridget Dalton et al.2015. Fifth-Grade Students' Digital Retellings and the Common Core. The Elementary School Journal 115, 4 (2015), 548--569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Barry J. Fishman. 2013. Design-based implementation research: theories, methods, and exemplars, New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dorothy C. Holland. 2003. Identity and agency in cultural worlds, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Glynda Hull and Mira-Lisa Katz. (2006). Crafting an Agentive Self: Case Studies of Digital Storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41, 1, 43--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mizuko Ito, Sonja Baumer, and Matteo Bittandi. 2010. Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: kids living and learning with new media, Cambridge, MA: MIT. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gunther Kress. 2010. Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kathy Mills. 2016. Literacy theories for the digital age: social, critical, multimodal, spatial, material and sensory lenses, Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaine E. Smith. 2016. Composing across modes: a comparative analysis of adolescents' multimodal composing processes. Learning, Media and Technology (2016),1--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Allison Skerrett. 2013. Building Multiliterate and Multilingual Writing Practices and Identities. English Education, 45 (4), 322--360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Abigaile Stangl, Jeeeun Kim, Tom Yeh, 3D printed tactile picture books for children with visual impairments: a design probe, In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children, June 17, 2014, Aarhus, Denmark. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kelly K. Wissman, Jeanine M. Staples, Lalitha Vasudevan, and Rachel E. Nichols. 2015. Cultivating Research Pedagogies with Adolescents: Created Spaces, Engaged Participation, and Embodied Inquiry. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 46, 2 (2015), 186--197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Stanton Wortham. 2004. From Good Student to Outcast: The Emergence of a Classroom Identity. Ethos 32, 2 (2004), 164--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tom Yeh, Stacey Forsyth, Abigale Stangl, and Bridget Dalton. 2016. Tactile Picture Books Project: Critical Making in Libraries to Broaden Participation in STEM, National Science Grant no. 161525.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Texture, Buttons, Sound and Code: Modal Preference and the Formation of Expert Identities

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        FabLearn '17: Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education
        October 2017
        116 pages
        ISBN:9781450363495
        DOI:10.1145/3141798

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 October 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate14of35submissions,40%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader