skip to main content
10.1145/3143434.3143439acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesiwsm-mensuraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A new approach for continuously monitoring project deadlines in software development

Published:25 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Checking regularly the progress of a running entire software development project or parts of it is a mandatory task of project management. The purpose of progress checks is to monitor whether an actual project will be completed successfully at the project deadline at the latest. It is common practice to track and to communicate project progress by burn charts, especially by burn-up charts in the case when the amount of work varies by, e.g., scope creep during the time line of the project. This paper shows that a burn-up chart continuously adapted by means of a specific rule and combined with a Bayesian Approach to the German tank problem leads to an efficient tool for project progress monitoring.

References

  1. G. Dinwiddie. 2009. Feel the Burn - Getting the Most out of Burn Charts. Better Software 11, 5 (2009), 26--31. Retrieved 2017-05-05 from http://idiacomput.mg.com/pub/BetterSoftware-BurnCharts.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Th. M. Fehlmann and E. Kranich. 2013. Introducing Short-Run Control Charts for Monitoring the Software Development Process. In MetriKon 2013, Tagungsband des Software Metrik Kongresses (November 14-15, 2013, Fraunhofer JESE, Kaiserslautern, Germany). Shaker Verlag, Aachen, Germany, 213--234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. A. Goodman. 1952. Serial Number Analysis. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 47, 260 (1952), 622--634. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. L. Held and D. Sabanés Bové. 2014. Applied Statistical Inference - Likelihood and Bayes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. Höhle and L. Held. 2006. Bayesian Estimation of the Size of a Population. Technical Paper 499. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Institut für Statistik, Munich, Germany. Retrieved 2017-04-24 from https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2094/1/paperGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. W. Hoyer and W. C. Ellis. 1996. A Graphical Exploration of SPC (Part 2). Quality Progress 29, 6 (1996), 57--64. Retrieved 2017-05-05 from http://asq.org/data/subscriptions/qp/1996/0696/qp0696hoyer.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. J. Hyndman. 2017. Package forecast Version 8.0 - Forecasting Functions for Time Series and Linear Models. (2017). Retrieved 2017-05-05 from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/forecast/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R.J. Hyndman and G. Athanasopoulos. 2014. Forecasting - Principles and Practice. OTexts.com, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved 2017-05-05 from https://www.otexts.org/fppGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Kocurek. 2011. Understanding of Burndown Chart. Methods & Tools 19, 4 (2011), 25--34. Retrieved 2017-05-05 from http://www.methodsandtools.com/PDF/mt201104.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. K. Kruschke. 2014. Doing Bayesian Data Analysis - A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Ruggles and H. Brodie. 1947. An Empirical Approach to Economic Intelligence in World War II. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 42, 237 (1947), 72--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. K. Siegrist. 2017. Order Statistics. (2017). Retrieved 2017-05-05 from http://www.math.uah.edu/stat//urn/OrderStatistics.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. The R Foundation. 2016. The R Project for Statistical Computing. (2016). Retrieved 2017-05-02 from http://www.r-project.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Wikipedia. 2017. German Tank Problem. (2017). Retrieved 2017-02-09 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_tank_problemGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A new approach for continuously monitoring project deadlines in software development

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IWSM Mensura '17: Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Software Measurement and 12th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement
      October 2017
      273 pages
      ISBN:9781450348539
      DOI:10.1145/3143434

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 October 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader