skip to main content
10.1145/3144457.3144508acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobiquitousConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

On the Feasibility of a Smartphone-based Solution to Rapid Quantitative Urinalysis using Nanomaterial Bioprobes

Published:07 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The main objective of this research is to design and develop a smartphone-based urinalysis device known as uTest that has the ability for patients themselves to conduct rapid quantitative diagnosis of human serum albumin (HSA) in urine using the aggregation-induced emission (AIE) nanomaterial bioprobes anytime, anywhere and with any mobile device. Work reported in this study has confirmed the feasibility of such a solution, which can achieve accurate urinalysis for HSA concentrations in the range of 0-100 mg/dL.

References

  1. Ahmet F. Coskun, Richie Nagi, Kayvon Sadeghi, Stephen Phillips, and Aydogan Ozcan. 2013. Albumin testing in urine using a smart-phone. Lab on a Chip 13 (2013), 4231--4238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D.M. Wong DM, S. Giguère, and M.A. Wendel. 2013. Evaluation of a point-of-care portable analyzer for measurement of plasma immunoglobulin G, total protein, and albumin concentrations in ill neonatal foals. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 242, 6 (2013), 812--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Rafael C. Gonzalez and Richard E. Woods. 2007. Digital Image Processing. Prentice Hall; 3rd edition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H Tong and Y Hong and Y Dong and M Häussler and Z Li and JW Lam and Y Dong and HH Sung and ID Williams and BZ Tang. 2007. Protein Detection and Quantitation by Tetraphenylethene-Based Fluorescent Probes with Aggregation-Induced Emission Characteristics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry 111, 40 (2007), 1817--11823.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. KDIGO. 2013. KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney International Supplements 3, 1 (2013), 19--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. W.F. Keane and G. Eknoyan. 1999. Proteinuria, albuminuria, risk, assessment, detection, elimination (PARADE): a position paper of the National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis 33, 5 (1999), 1004--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Wanida Laiwattanapaisal, Temsiri Songjaroen, Thitima Maturos, Tanom Lomas, Assawapong Sappat, and Adisorn Tuantranont. 2009. On-Chip Immunoassay for Determination of Urinary Albumin. Sensors 9, 12 (2009), 10066--10079.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S.L. White, R Yu, J.C. Craig, K.R. Polkinghorne, R.C. Atkins, and S.J. Chadban. 2011. Diagnostic accuracy of urine dipsticks for detection of albuminuria in the general community. Am J Kidney Dis 58 (2011), 19--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. On the Feasibility of a Smartphone-based Solution to Rapid Quantitative Urinalysis using Nanomaterial Bioprobes

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        MobiQuitous 2017: Proceedings of the 14th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services
        November 2017
        555 pages
        ISBN:9781450353687
        DOI:10.1145/3144457

        Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 November 2017

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate26of87submissions,30%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader