skip to main content
10.1145/3144826.3145362acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Do Students Really Understand the Difference Between Simulation and Remote Labs?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Laboratory experiments play a crucial role in engineering education as they strongly contribute to the development of important skills for the professional practice. This paper addresses a students' understanding gap between simulations and remote labs. These two resources (and namely the remote laboratory VISIR - Virtual Instrument Systems in Reality) have been commonly used on several didactical implementations, along with other didactical resources in different Engineering degrees at the Federal University of Santa Catarina and Polytechnic of Porto School of Engineering. This work, developed in the scope of the VISIR+ Project, intends to evaluate students' perceptions considering simulation and remote lab results. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed to better understand how deeply students realize the differences between these resources and their type of data. Preliminary results indicate that a considerable number of student's don´t have a clear idea of these differences, even though sometimes they know their definition. Furthermore, this gap does not seem to differ much with the context (country, course, academic year, course content), students' final grades, teacher approach or implemented tasks.

References

  1. C. Jara, F. Candelas, S. Puentes and F. Torres, "Hands-on experiences of undergraduate students in Automatics and Robotics," Computer and Education, vol. 57, pp. 2451--2461, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Prensky, "Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants," On the Horizon (MCB University Press), October 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. R. Brinson, "Learning outcome achievment in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical reserach," Computres & Education, vol. 87, pp. 218--237, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Richardson, "Approaches to studying, conceptions of learning and learning styles in higher education," Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 21, pp. 288--293, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. Alves, M. Marques, C. Viegas, M. C. Costa Lobo, R. Barral, R. Couto, F. Jacob, C. Ramos, G. C. D. Vilão, J. Alves, P. Guimarães and I. Gustavsson, "Using VISIR in a large undergraduate course: Premiminary assessments results," in Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. "{IAOE} Winners of the GOLC Online Laboratory Award," 11 February 2015. {Online}. Available: http://lists.online-lists.org/pipermail/iaoe-members/2015-February/000120.html. {Accessed 2016}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. I. Gustavsson, J. Zackrisson, K. Nilsson, J. Garcia-Zubia, L. Hakansson, I. Claesson and T. Lago, "A Flexible Electronics Laboratory with Local and Remote Workbenches in a Grid," International Journal of Online Engineering (iJOE), Vols. Vol. 4, n° 2, pp. 12--16, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. M. Salah, G. R. Alves, D. H. Abdulazeez, P. Guerreiro and I. Gustavsson, "Why VISIR? Proliferative Activitites and Colaborative Work of VISIR Community," in EDULEARN2015 Proceedings, Barcelona, Spain, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. R. Koul and T. M. Dana, "Contextualized Science for Teaching Science and Technology," T.M. Interchange, Vols. 28, Issue 2, pp. 121--144, Abril 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. Stinner, "Contextual settings, science stories, and large context problems: Toward a more humanistic science education," Science Education, Vols. 79, Issue 5, pp. 555--581, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. N. Lima, G. Alves, C. Viegas and I. Gustavsson, "Combined Efforts to develop students experimental competences," in Proceedings Exp.at'15 3rd International Experimental Conference, Ponta Delgada, Azores, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. C. Viegas, N. Lima, G. Alves and I. Gustavsson, "Improving students experimental competences using simultaneous methods in class and assessments," in TEEEM'14 Proceedings of the second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, Salamanca, Spain, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Lima, C. Viegas, G. Alves and F. Garcia-Peñalvo, "VISIR's Usage as an Educational Resource: a Review of the Empirical Research," in Proceedings TEEM2016 - Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'16), Salamanca, Spain, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. L. Cohen, L. Manion and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education, 6th Edition, London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. G. Alves, A. Fidalgo, M. A. Marques, C. Viegas, M. Felgueiras, R. Costa, N. Lima, J. Garcia-Zubia, U. Hernández-Jayo, M. Castro, G. Díaz-Orueta, A. Pester, D. Zutin and W. Kulesza, "Spreading remote labs usage: A System -- A Community -- A Federation," in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE2016), Vila Real, Portugal, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Do Students Really Understand the Difference Between Simulation and Remote Labs?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEEM 2017: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
      October 2017
      723 pages
      ISBN:9781450353861
      DOI:10.1145/3144826

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 October 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      TEEM 2017 Paper Acceptance Rate84of109submissions,77%Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader