skip to main content
10.1145/3147213.3147222acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Crop Water Stress Monitoring System Utilising a Hybrid e-Infrastructure

Published:05 December 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

There are many challenges involved in irrigation systems in agricultural environments. Many approaches simply support crop watering as a simple standardised solution - watering the fields uniformly. However, depending on the topology of the ground and the crop species that exists, considerable improvements can be achieved that can greatly impact on the overall crop yield. Too little watering or too much watering in the wrong areas can impact the overall output. With the rapid growth in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and drones, image capture technology is now readily available. If the water-stressed areas could be identified, irrigation systems could offer targeted irrigation to only those crops in need. To support this, a crop water stress monitoring system has been designed utilising the thermal images of the crops. The analysis of such data can be computationally demanding when large crop fields are considered, hence the system has been designed to use multi-core high performance computing and Cloud-based systems. This paper outlines the requirements and design of the crop water stress monitoring system and how it provides an efficient and effective analysis of crop water stress index. The paper also benchmarks the algorithms across the hybrid infrastructure.

References

  1. Malveaux C., Hall S.G., and PriceR 2014. Using Dronesin Agriculture: Unmanned Aerial Systems for Agricultural Remote Sensing Applications. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 141911016 (July 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Stajnko D., Lakota M., and Hocevar M. 2004. Estimation of number and diameter of apple fruits in an orchard during the growing season by thermal imaging. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 42 (January 2004), 31--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Martin E. 2005. Methods of Determining When to Irrigate. Cooperative Extension. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson (June 2005), 91--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Oerke E.-C., Lindenthal M., Frohling P., and Steiner U. 2005. Digital Infrared Thermography for the Assessment of Leaf Pathogens. The 5th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (June 2005), 91--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Oerke E.-C., Steiner U., Dehne H.-W., and Lindenthal M. 2006. Thermal Imaging of Cucumber Leaves Affected by Downy Mildew and Environmental Conditions. Experimental Botany 57 (May 2006), 2121--2132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Meinke H. and Stone R.C. 1997. On tactical crop management using seasonal cli- mate forecasts and simulation modelling: a case study for wheat. Scientia Agricola 54 (June 1997), 121--129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones H.G., Stoll M., Santos T., Sousa C.D., Chaves M.M., and Grant O.M. 2002. Use of infrared thermography for monitoring stomatal closure in the eld: application to grapevine. Journal of Experimental Botany 53 (March 2002), 2249--2260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Berni J.A., Zarco-Tejada P.J., Suarez L., and Fereres E. 2009. Thermal and narrowband multispectral remote sensing for vegetation monitoring from an unmanned aerial vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 47 (February 2009), 722--738.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ray D.Jackson 1983. Assessing moisture stress in wheat with hand-held radio meters. International Society for Optics and Photonics 0356 (June 1983), 121--129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lian Pin Koh and Serge A. Wich. 2012. Dawn of Drone Ecology: Low-Cost Autonomous Aerial Vehicles for Conservation. Tropical Conservation Science 5(2) (June 2012), 121--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Guilioni L., Jones H.G., Leinonen I., and Lhomme J.P. 2008. On the relationships between stomatal resistance and leaf temperatures in thermography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 148, 11 (July 2008), 1908--1912.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Hori M., Kawashima E., and Yamazaki T. 2010. Application of cloud computing to agriculture and prospects in other fields. Fujitsu Scientific Technical Journal 46 (October 2010), 446--454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lindenthal M., Steiner U., Dehne H.-W., and Oerke E.-C. 2005. Effect of Downy Mildew Development on Transpiration of Cucumber Leaves Visualized by Digital Infrared Thermography. Phytopathology 95 (March 2005), 233--240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gontia N.K. and Tiwari K.N. 2008. Development of crop water stress index of wheat crop for scheduling irrigation using infrared thermometry. Agricultural water management 95, 10 (July 2008), 1908--1912.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. The State of Victoria. 1996. Agriculture Victoria. (June 1996). Retrieved June, 15th 2017 from http://agriculture.vic.gov.au/agriculture/farm-management/ soil- and- water/irrigation/about- irrigationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang P., Wang J., Chen Y., and Ni G. 2013. Rapid processing of remote sensing images based on cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems 29 (March 2013), 1963--1968. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pinter Jr P.J., Hatfield J.L., Schepers J.S., Barnes E.M., Moran M.S., Daughtry C.S., and Upchurch D.R. 2003. Remote sensing for crop management. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69 (June 2003), 647--664.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mo X., Liu S., Lin Z., Xu Y., Xiang Y., and McVicar T.R. 2005. Prediction of crop yield, water consumption and water use efficiency with a SVAT-crop growth model using remotely sensed data on the North China Plain. Ecological Modelling 183, 2 (April 2005), 301--322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Wang X., Yang W., Wheaton A., Cooley N., and Moran B. 2010. Automated canopy temperature estimation via infrared thermography: A first step towards automated plant water stress monitoring. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 73, 1 (July 2010), 74--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Chen Z., Chen N., Yang C., and Di L. 2012. Cloud computing enabled web processing service for earth observation data processing. IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing 5 (July 2012), 1637--1649.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Baher Z.F., Mirza M., Ghorbanli M., and Bagher R.M. 2002. The influence of water stress on plant height, herbal and essential oil yield and composition in Satureja hortensis L. Flavour and Fragrance Journal 17 (July 2002), 275--277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Crop Water Stress Monitoring System Utilising a Hybrid e-Infrastructure

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UCC '17: Proceedings of the10th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing
      December 2017
      222 pages
      ISBN:9781450351492
      DOI:10.1145/3147213

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 December 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UCC '17 Paper Acceptance Rate17of63submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate38of125submissions,30%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader